Sensitivity of Frequent SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Rapid Antigen Testing Regimen

NCT ID: NCT04805840

Last Updated: 2021-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-19

Study Completion Date

2021-07-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess how an at-home COVID-19 frequent testing regimen using the CoV-SCAN test kit and a paired phone application to help interpret the test result compares to once-a-week or three-times-a-week polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (molecular) testing to identify a SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Employees and cast members at Media and Entertainment Company and its affiliates will be recruited to test whether frequent use of CoV-SCAN will perform as well or better than weekly molecular testing and at least as well as three-times-a-week molecular testing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Antigen tests are simple to perform, have a rapid turn-around time of 15-30 minutes, and a lower cost than molecular tests. Because antigen tests do not incorporate an amplification step, they are intrinsically less sensitive than PCR molecular tests. Nevertheless, several investigators have examined the feasibility of screening populations of individuals in a low SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence situation, such as the workplace or schools, with rapid antigen tests in place of the molecular tests. Using viral kinetics, knowledge of what level of viral load is required for transmission of culture-competent virus, test sensitivity and modeling, they have come to the conclusion that more frequent testing with a test with lower sensitivity that has a quick turn-around time is better than a test with high sensitivity with a longer turn-around time. Therefore, the goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that frequent testing with a relatively sensitive lateral flow antigen test performed at home using self-collected anterior nasal swabs will be superior to once a week or less PCR testing and non-inferior to three times a week PCR testing in an employment screening setting with a relatively low incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections. This study aims to assess how an at-home COVID-19 frequent testing regimen using a Rapid Antigen Screening Test (RAST) and a phone application to help interpret the test result compares to once-a-week or three-times-a-week PCR (molecular) testing to identify a SARS-CoV-2 infection. We expect to recruit up to 4,400 employees and cast members of Media and Entertainment Company and its affiliates to test whether frequent use of the RAST will perform as well or better than weekly molecular testing and at least as well as three-times-a-week molecular testing. Recruitment and the study will continue until at least 31 or at most 148 true positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular results are reached.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Covid19

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

COVID-19 COVID Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CoV-SCAN rapid COVID-19 antigen test

SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen screening test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 years or older;
* Have a smartphone;
* Understand and read English;
* Will be on one production location for at least three weeks following enrollment to the study;
* Will be willing to be contacted by the Study Coordinator after leaving one production location to facilitate continued access to weekly molecular testing;

Exclusion Criteria

* Have received any dose of COVID-19 vaccination;
* Have been diagnosed with COVID-19 infection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kathrine Meyers, DrPH, MS, MPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant Professor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAT5233

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id