Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain

NCT ID: NCT04801082

Last Updated: 2021-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-31

Study Completion Date

2025-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Many cancer patients suffer from intractable pain and which is often suboptimally controlled by even strong opioid analgesics. Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is procedure which intended to permanently destroy the nociceptive pathway that transmits the pain caused by the tumour. It can be with different approaches, such as percutaneously guided by fluoroscopy, echo-endoscopically or surgically with endoscopic approach being the more popular one in many centers equipped with echo-endoscopic services. The effect of CPN has been well established by some retrospective series. The overall response rate to CPN ranges from 70-90%, however, the analgesic effect is limited and up to roughly around 3 months. It is believed that the short-lasting analgesic effect is related to incomplete neurolysis by absolute alcohol injection.

Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of coeliac plexus has been introduced as another mode of CPN. So far, only one small single center randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggesting superior performance in favour to CPN using RFA. This result has to be validated and by a RCT with larger sample size. In addition, data concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement and cost-effectiveness need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to perform a RCT to look into these issues.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of EUS-CPN by chemical ablation using alcohol injection versus by radiofrequency ablation in patients with cancer pain related to intra-abdominal malignancy. This is a randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of this new treatment approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignancy Pain Management

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS-CPB

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alcohol injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemical ablation is performed by injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol using a 22G FNA needle (Cook and Olympus)

EUS-CPA

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Coeliac Plexus Radiofrequency Ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiofrequency Ablation

Intervention Type DEVICE

coeliac plexus is identified and punctured with 19G EUSRA RFA needle with 10W-30W of energy for 10-50s bilaterally or unilaterally depends on individual anatomical characteristics.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alcohol injection

Chemical ablation is performed by injection of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by 10 mL of 98% dehydrated alcohol using a 22G FNA needle (Cook and Olympus)

Intervention Type DRUG

Radiofrequency Ablation

coeliac plexus is identified and punctured with 19G EUSRA RFA needle with 10W-30W of energy for 10-50s bilaterally or unilaterally depends on individual anatomical characteristics.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Chemical Ablation RFA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 year-old
* Patients who give informed consent to the study
* Suboptimal pain control with regular analgesics
* Inoperable cancer of pancreas, biliary system and liver (both primary or secondary)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who refuse to give consent
* Patients aged \<18 years
* EUS not possible due to:
* Problem related to scope insertion such as trismus, stenosis of the upper GI tract
* Coagulopathy with INR \>1.5 or platelet count \< 70
* Low oxygen saturation or extreme blood pressure render endoscopic procedure unsafe
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Ma Ka Wing

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Wan Yee Chiu, BISC

Role: CONTACT

+852 2255 4848

Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS

Role: CONTACT

+852 2255 3025

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ka Wing Ma, MBBS, MS

Role: primary

+852 2255 3025

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202009185043

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.