Gonyautoxin 2/3 in the Treatment of Acute Back Pain: A Clinical Proof-of-concept Study
NCT ID: NCT04799041
Last Updated: 2021-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-11
2020-03-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of a single local IM injection of gonyautoxin 2/3 (GTX 2/3) compared to placebo in decreasing pain and improving lumbar functionality at short term follow-up in adult patients with acute low back pain, without radiculopathy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Botulinum Toxin Type A for Neuroma Pain
NCT01374191
Botulinum Toxin A for the Treatment of Chronic Lumbar Back Pain
NCT00404417
Single or Repeat Dose of G03-52-01 in Adult Subjects
NCT05348993
Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A Treatments on Pain and Disability in Sub-Acute Low Back Pain
NCT00384371
Efficacy and Safety of Etoricoxib/Tizanidine Versus Etoricoxib for Acute Low Back Pain Associated to Muscle Spasm
NCT06863662
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective was to determine the clinical efficacy of GTX 2/3 in the decrease of pain and in the functional improvement of adults patients with acute back pain with no associated radiculopathy. The secondary objective was to determine the safety of a local intramuscular injection of GTX 2/3 in adults patients with acute back pain.
Thirty subjects were studied in 2 groups, each consisting of 15 subjects. One group received the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) and the other group received placebo.
The eligible patients were adults, from both sex, aged between 18 and 70 years, with an episode of acute back pain without radiculopathy, with a pain intensity higher than 4 in the VAS scale, with no chronic pain and without any severe pathology.
Each subject participated in 1 treatment group only. All subjects received IV administration of 100 mg Ketoprofen before the IMP injection. All patients returned for a follow-up visit at day 4 after dose administration and at day 7 for discharge. Follow up telephone calls were done on day 1, 2 and 3 after the administration.
Each subject received only a single dose of GTX 2/3 or placebo during the study. Doses were administered as IM paravertebral injections, 1 mL per site. Total of 2 mL of GTX 2/3 or placebo. The IMP was supplied in glass vials containing 1.2 mL solution at a total GTX 2 and GTX 3 concentration of 40 mcg/mL (at a relative epimer ratio of 62% GTX 2:38% GTX 3). The total concentration of drug administrated was 80 mcg. Placebo was of identical appearance to the IMP.
Patients that participated in the study had the possibility of using rescue medication. As a first line medication was Ketoprofen (maximum of 200 mg per day) and as a second line analgesia was Tramadol®.
The primary efficacy endpoints were the mean change in pain intensity and lumbar function from baseline to day 4, as measured by VAS and RMDQ scores, respectively. Secondary outcomes were: 1) the mean change in pain intensity and lumbar function from baseline to day 7 as measured by VAS and RMDQ scores, respectively, 2) the frequency of use of rescue pain drugs during Days 1 to 3, and 3) the occurrence of adverse events during the 7 days of the study period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GTX 2/3
Dose level administered of GTX 2/3 was 80 mcg. Dose was administered as IM paravertebral injections, 1 mL per site. Total of 2 mL of GTX 2/3 was injected. The IMP was supplied in glass vials containing 1.2 mL solution at a total GTX 2 and GTX 3 concentration of 40 mcg/mL (at a relative epimer ratio of 62% GTX 2:38% GTX 3).
GTX 2/3
There were 15 patients in this group. Each one received only one treatment.
Placebo
Placebo was of identical appearance to the IMP, and was administered as IM paravertebral injections, 1 mL per site. Total of 2 mL of placebo was injected.
Placebo
There were 15 patients in this group. Each one received only one treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GTX 2/3
There were 15 patients in this group. Each one received only one treatment.
Placebo
There were 15 patients in this group. Each one received only one treatment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute back pain episode without radiculopathy asociated and no red flags.
* Back pain related pain bigger than 4 in VAS.
* Patients with no severe illnesses or conditions that would be inappropriate to enroll in this study or patients with no chronic pain.
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Hyper acute back pain that requires emergency hospitalization.
* Chronic back pain or complicated (red flags).
* Patients that have received previous analgesic therapy of long half life, like corticoids, for current back pain or other pathology (inhalers are excluded).
* Associated neuromuscular diseases, inflammatory diseases in the spine (Musculoskeletal Disorders 2017, 18; 454: 2-12), inability to stand up, tumoral diseases, terminal disease.
* Ongoing local treatment with calcium antagonists or trinitroglycerin.
* Treatment with anti-vitamins K or another anticoagulant.
* Patients with adverse psychosomatic, work or social factors.
* Known or suspected allergy to any component of the study drug.
* Current participation in another clinical study or 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Another condition that in the opinion of the PI prevents participation in the study (physical or mental) or that cannot attend controls or answer the patient's survey / diary.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Algenis SpA
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francisco Bravo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital San José
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital San José SSMN
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLN 17-032 (Chilean Number)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.