Trial Outcomes & Findings for Promoting Evidenced-Based Tobacco Smoking Cessation Treatment in Community Mental Health Clinics (NCT NCT04796961)
NCT ID: NCT04796961
Last Updated: 2025-09-03
Results Overview
Knowledge of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment: 16-item scale developed by our team. Items are true/false and score reflects number answered correctly. Average score range 0-16 with a higher score signifies an increased knowledge of smoking cessation treatment.
COMPLETED
NA
91 participants
Baseline, 12 months
2025-09-03
Participant Flow
Mental health clinic staff (providers and prescribers) were recruited from 5 mental health clinics.
Ninety-one mental health clinic staff (providers and prescribers) were enrolled in the study. The mental health clinics had 6,011 clients with data that were included in the analysis.
Unit of analysis: Clinics
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
91 5
|
|
Overall Study
Mental Health Clinic Clients (Not Enrolled)
|
6011 5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
68 5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
23 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Left Organization
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
Promoting Evidenced-Based Tobacco Smoking Cessation Treatment in Community Mental Health Clinics
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=91 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Staff Role
Counseling Provider
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Staff Role
Prescriber
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 monthsPopulation: Staff with data collected analyzed under modeling approach.
Knowledge of evidence-based smoking cessation treatment: 16-item scale developed by our team. Items are true/false and score reflects number answered correctly. Average score range 0-16 with a higher score signifies an increased knowledge of smoking cessation treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=90 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Provider (Staff) Knowledge of Smoking Cessation Treatment as Assessed by a 16-item Scale
Baseline
|
13.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
—
|
|
Provider (Staff) Knowledge of Smoking Cessation Treatment as Assessed by a 16-item Scale
12 months
|
14.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 monthsPopulation: Staff with data collected analyzed under modeling approach.
Self-efficacy for a four components of the smoking cessation intervention were evaluated using an instrument adapted from Compeau and Higgins' task-focused self-efficacy scale. Responses for items are on a Likert scale of 1-10. Average score range 1-10 and higher scores signify greater self-efficacy for the smoking cessation task.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=53 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
n=37 Participants
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Screening - Baseline
|
7.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2
|
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Screening - 12 Months
|
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Readiness to Quit Assessment - Baseline
|
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
6.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Readiness to Quit Assessment - 12 Months
|
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Cessation Counseling - Baseline
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Cessation Counseling - 12 Months
|
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
—
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy - Baseline
|
—
|
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
|
Provider Self-efficacy to Deliver Evidence-based Smoking Cessation Treatment
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy - 12 Months
|
—
|
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 monthsPopulation: Mental health clinic clients
Assessment of smoking status measured by clinic documentation during client visits with the number below indicating the number of clients who had a smoking status assessment during the 12 month study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=6011 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clients Recieved Smoking Status Assessment
|
3406 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 monthsPopulation: Clients who had a smoking status assessment collected where they reported smoking during the study period were included in this analysis.
Assessment of willingness to quit measured by clinic documentation during client visits, with the number below indicating the number of clients who reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who had a willingness to quit assessment during the 12 month study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=1469 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clients Willing to Quit Smoking That Received a Willingness to Quit Assessment
|
1192 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 monthsPopulation: Clients who had a smoking status assessment collected where they reported smoking during the study period were included in this analysis.
Receipt of behavioral counseling measured by clinic documentation during client visits, with the number below indicating the number of clients interested in quitting smoking that reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who staff reported as receiving behavioral counseling during the 12 months study period. Data is reported in two groups based upon whether the client had a recorded interest in quitting smoking or not, and only includes clients who reported smoking at some point during the study period. Clients can be reported in both groups if they responded differently to this question at two points over the course of the 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=1469 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking Who Received Smoking Cessation Behavioral Counseling
Client Smokers Reported Interest in Quitting
|
529 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking Who Received Smoking Cessation Behavioral Counseling
Clients Not Reported Interest In Quitting Smoking
|
759 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 monthsPopulation: Clients who had a smoking status assessment collected where they reported smoking during the study period were included in this analysis
Measured by clinic documentation during client visits with the number below indicating the number of clients interested in quitting smoking, that reported smoking during a smoking status assessment who staff reported as receiving smoking cessation pharmacotherapy during the 12 months study period. Clients can be reported in both groups (Interested in quitting, not interested in quitting) if they responded differently to this question at two points over the course of the 12 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=1469 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking That Received Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy
Client Smokers Reported Interest in Quitting
|
232 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Clients Interested in Quitting Smoking That Received Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy
Client Smokers Not Reported Interest in Quitting
|
173 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 monthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Post Training
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
—
|
|
Acceptability of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention Measure
12 Months
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 MonthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater appropriateness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Appropriateness of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Post Training
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
—
|
|
Appropriateness of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
12 Months
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 MonthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Post Training
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
—
|
|
Feasibility of Evidence-based Practices Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
12 Months
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 MonthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Post Training
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
—
|
|
Acceptability of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of Acceptability of Intervention Measure
12 Months
|
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 MonthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater appropriateness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Appropriateness of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Post Training
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
—
|
|
Appropriateness of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure
12 Months
|
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post Training (up to 2 weeks), 12 MonthsPopulation: Staff with data collected, analyzed under modeling approach.
An adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure was used. Each of the items will be measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1=completely disagree and 5=completely agree. An average score is calculated by summing responses across all four items and dividing by the total number of items. The average score ranges from 1-5. A higher score signifies greater feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Implementation Intervention
n=66 Participants
All participants will receive the implementation intervention.
Implementation Intervention: The implementation intervention involves training, coaching, expert consultation, organizational strategy meetings.
|
Prescribers
Consented and enrolled staff participants at mental health organizations who prescribe medications
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Post Training
|
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
|
Feasibility of Implementation Intervention Based on Adaptation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
12 Months
|
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 MonthsPopulation: Information data source was the health record and this data was not present routinely. When available the data appeared not to be valid.
7-day patient abstinence reported in medical record
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Implementation Intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Gail Daumit MD, MHS
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place