Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of Investigational Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lenses Produced With Different Manufacturing Processes (NCT NCT04794751)
NCT ID: NCT04794751
Last Updated: 2022-06-21
Results Overview
Binocular visual performance on logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale was evaluated at distance (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high luminance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be between 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 m), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64cm) and Near (40cm), the cceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20. The average score was reported for each lens.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
1-Week Follow-up
2022-06-21
Participant Flow
In total, 78 subject were enrolled in this study. Of those enrolled, 75 subjects were dispensed at least one study lens while 3 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of those who were assigned and administered a test article, 64 subjects completed the study while 11 subjects were discontinued.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Delefilcon A/Senofilcon A C3/Senofilcon A C3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the delefilcon A lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A C3 lenses during the second and third periods.
|
Senofilcon A C3/Delefilcon A/Delefilcon A
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A C3 lens during the first period and then received the delefilcon A lenses during the second and third periods.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
38
|
37
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
36
|
32
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
5
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
36
|
32
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
35
|
29
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
|
Period 3
STARTED
|
35
|
29
|
|
Period 3
COMPLETED
|
35
|
29
|
|
Period 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Delefilcon A/Senofilcon A C3/Senofilcon A C3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the delefilcon A lens during the first period and then received the senofilcon A C3 lenses during the second and third periods.
|
Senofilcon A C3/Delefilcon A/Delefilcon A
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the senofilcon A C3 lens during the first period and then received the delefilcon A lenses during the second and third periods.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
incorrect fitting guide was used to fit subject
|
2
|
1
|
|
Period 1
Subject no longer meets eligibility criteria
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 1
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
2
|
|
Period 1
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
Period 2
incorrect fitting guide was used to fit subject
|
0
|
2
|
|
Period 2
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of Investigational Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lenses Produced With Different Manufacturing Processes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Dispensed Subjects
n=75 Participants
All subjects dispensed a study lens.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.44 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
69 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits, without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary or secondary endpoint.
Binocular visual performance on logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale was evaluated at distance (4 m), intermediate (64 cm) and near (40 cm) under high luminance high contrast lighting conditions using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be between 7.3 and 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4 m), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181-208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64cm) and Near (40cm), the cceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. logMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20. The average score was reported for each lens.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A C3
n=64 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in either of the three study periods.
|
Delefilcon A
n=64 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either of the three study periods.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Performance (logMAR)
Distance (4m)
|
-0.08 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.068
|
-0.06 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.081
|
|
Visual Performance (logMAR)
Intermediate (64cm)
|
-0.01 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.096
|
0.00 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.090
|
|
Visual Performance (logMAR)
Near (40cm)
|
0.10 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.094
|
0.09 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.089
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1-Week Follow-upPopulation: Subjects that completed all study visits, without a major protocol deviation impacting a primary or secondary endpoint.
Subjective vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Senofilcon A C3
n=64 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test lens in either of the three study periods.
|
Delefilcon A
n=64 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either of the three study periods.
|
|---|---|---|
|
CLUE Vision
|
55.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.468
|
55.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.422
|
Adverse Events
Senofilcon A C3
Delefilcon A
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Thomas R. Karkkainen, OD, MS, FAAO
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60