Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-22
2023-07-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ENCOMPASS: Expansion Study C
NCT04791267
Enhancing Community Health Through Patient Navigation, Advocacy and Social Support
NCT03077386
Nurse-assisted Intervention "eHealth@ Hospital -2-home"
NCT05750953
Patient Navigation in Primary Care and Access to Resources in the Community
NCT03451552
A Community-based Program That Supports Physical Activity, Healthy Eating, Social Participation and System Navigation in Older Adults
NCT05008159
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ENCOMPASS program of research was initiated in 2016, when researchers with the University of Calgary's Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration partnered with Mosaic Primary Care Network (PCN) to develop, implement and evaluate a community health navigation program for patients with multiple chronic conditions. The program was based on a systematic literature review and refined in consultation with key stakeholders. A cluster-randomized controlled trial is currently ongoing with Mosaic PCN to determine the impact of the program on acute care use, patient-reported outcomes and experience, and disease-specific clinical outcomes (NCT03077386).
Alberta Primary Care Networks (PCNs) are comprised of groups of family physicians and other health care professionals working together to provide comprehensive patient care to Albertans. To understand if the community health navigation program can be feasibly scaled and spread to PCNs across Alberta, we are expanding research to examine and evaluate community health navigation program implementation to other geographic areas and populations. This study expands the ENCOMPASS program of research to Edmonton Oliver PCN, which represents over 170 physician members and serves approximately 131,000 patients. The current study employs the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) to examine the scalability of the community health navigation program.
The objectives of this study are to (1) assess the impact of the intervention on the target population and health system (effectiveness); (2) explore the feasibility and appropriateness of practical intervention scale-up (reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance), and (3) identify the required resources and infrastructure necessary to maintain and scale the intervention provincially.
The effectiveness of the community health navigator program will be studied using a two-armed, pragmatic, randomized waitlist-controlled trial. This study will employ patient-level block randomization with research staff blinded to block size. Randomization will be concealed and computer-generated. Primary outcomes will be assessed using administrative health data. Secondary outcomes will be measured using a patient health survey administered by a research assistant at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. A concurrent qualitative study will provide contextual information on the effectiveness of the community health navigator program from patient, provider, and CHN perspectives. Process evaluation metrics and interviews with program stakeholders will inform the feasibility and sustainability of the community health navigator program in Alberta PCNs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Community health navigator program for six months.
Community Health Navigator Program
Patients will be matched to a community health navigator (CHN) who will conduct a needs assessment to determine the frequency of meetings. A CHN may perform any of the following: providing information to a patient's health care provider, translation, advocating for the patient, connecting the patient with resources (e.g., social, financial, insurance), helping patients set health-related goals, facilitating health care referrals and appointments, and monitoring appointments. These activities may require the CHN to be physically present at appointments or have direct contact with the patient's health care provider. Goal setting and support will be provided in-person or over the telephone using motivational interviewing principles.
Control
Waitlist control: six-month waiting period followed by six months of community health navigator program.
Community Health Navigator Program
Patients will be matched to a community health navigator (CHN) who will conduct a needs assessment to determine the frequency of meetings. A CHN may perform any of the following: providing information to a patient's health care provider, translation, advocating for the patient, connecting the patient with resources (e.g., social, financial, insurance), helping patients set health-related goals, facilitating health care referrals and appointments, and monitoring appointments. These activities may require the CHN to be physically present at appointments or have direct contact with the patient's health care provider. Goal setting and support will be provided in-person or over the telephone using motivational interviewing principles.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Community Health Navigator Program
Patients will be matched to a community health navigator (CHN) who will conduct a needs assessment to determine the frequency of meetings. A CHN may perform any of the following: providing information to a patient's health care provider, translation, advocating for the patient, connecting the patient with resources (e.g., social, financial, insurance), helping patients set health-related goals, facilitating health care referrals and appointments, and monitoring appointments. These activities may require the CHN to be physically present at appointments or have direct contact with the patient's health care provider. Goal setting and support will be provided in-person or over the telephone using motivational interviewing principles.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Poorly controlled diabetes (A1C \> 9% on at least one occasion within the past year or labile);
* Stage 3b or greater chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 in past year);
* Established ischemic heart disease (at least one instance of a physician billing diagnosis with a relevant International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition \[ICD-9\] code recorded in electronic medical record (EMR), or known to health care team);
* Congestive heart failure (at least one instance of a physician billing diagnosis with a relevant ICD-9 code recorded in EMR, or known to health care team);
* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease OR Asthma with at least two visits in the past year (at least 2 instances of a physician billing diagnosis with a relevant ICD-9 code, or known to health care team).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient residing in long-term care facility;
* Health care provider discretion.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kerry A McBrien, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Edmonton Oliver Primary Care Network
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lehmann U, Sanders, D. Community health workers: What do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs an impact on health outcomes of Using community health workers. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2007.
Najafizada SA, Bourgeault IL, Labonte R, Packer C, Torres S. Community health workers in Canada and other high-income countries: A scoping review and research gaps. Can J Public Health. 2015 Mar 12;106(3):e157-64. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4747.
Addressing chronic disease through community health workers: A policy and systems-level approach. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015.
Kangovi S, Grande D, Trinh-Shevrin C. From rhetoric to reality--community health workers in post-reform U.S. health care. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2277-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1502569. No abstract available.
Burns ME, Galbraith AA, Ross-Degnan D, Balaban RB. Feasibility and evaluation of a pilot community health worker intervention to reduce hospital readmissions. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Aug;26(4):358-65. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu046. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
Enard KR, Ganelin DM. Reducing preventable emergency department utilization and costs by using community health workers as patient navigators. J Healthc Manag. 2013 Nov-Dec;58(6):412-27; discussion 428.
Herman D, Conover S, Felix A, Nakagawa A, Mills D. Critical Time Intervention: an empirically supported model for preventing homelessness in high risk groups. J Prim Prev. 2007 Jul;28(3-4):295-312. doi: 10.1007/s10935-007-0099-3. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, Huo H, Smith RA, Long JA. Community Health Worker Support for Disadvantaged Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1660-1667. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303985. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, White ML, McCollum S, Sellman J, Shannon RP, Long JA. Patient-centered community health worker intervention to improve posthospital outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):535-43. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14327.
Kim K, Choi JS, Choi E, Nieman CL, Joo JH, Lin FR, Gitlin LN, Han HR. Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):e3-e28. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302987. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Carrasquillo O, Lebron C, Alonzo Y, Li H, Chang A, Kenya S. Effect of a Community Health Worker Intervention Among Latinos With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: The Miami Healthy Heart Initiative Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):948-954. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0926.
Morgan AU, Grande DT, Carter T, Long JA, Kangovi S. Penn Center for Community Health Workers: Step-by-Step Approach to Sustain an Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Intervention at an Academic Medical Center. Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1958-1960. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303366. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
McBrien KA, Ivers N, Barnieh L, Bailey JJ, Lorenzetti DL, Nicholas D, Tonelli M, Hemmelgarn B, Lewanczuk R, Edwards A, Braun T, Manns B. Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0191980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191980. eCollection 2018.
Ali-Faisal SF, Colella TJ, Medina-Jaudes N, Benz Scott L. The effectiveness of patient navigation to improve healthcare utilization outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):436-448. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Walkinshaw E. Patient navigators becoming the norm in Canada. CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1109-10. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3974. Epub 2011 Sep 19. No abstract available.
Desveaux L, McBrien K, Barnieh L, Ivers NM. Mapping variation in intervention design: a systematic review to develop a program theory for patient navigator programs. Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0920-5.
Shommu NS, Ahmed S, Rumana N, Barron GR, McBrien KA, Turin TC. What is the scope of improving immigrant and ethnic minority healthcare using community navigators: A systematic scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 15;15:6. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0298-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB19-1766
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.