Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) in Infected and Non Infected Sockets

NCT ID: NCT04787224

Last Updated: 2021-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-15

Study Completion Date

2021-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vestibular socket therapy with immediate implant placement is compared in infected and non-infected sockets regarding implant survival, bone thickness and soft tissue height .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For non infected sockets, a 15c blade (Stoma, Storz am Mark GmbH, Emmingen-Liptingen Germany) was used to cut a 1-cm long vestibular access incision , 3-4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction of the involved tooth. The socket orifice and the vestibular access incision were connected by a subperiosteal tunnel that was created using a periotome and a micro-periosteal elevator (Stoma, Storz am Mark GmbH, Emmingen-Liptingen Germany). Implants, (Biohorizons, Birmingham, Al, USA) , were installed using a 3D printed surgical guide (Surgical Guide Resin, Form 2, Formlabs). A flexible cortical membrane shield (OsteoBiol® Lamina, Tecnoss®, Torino, Italy) of heterologous origin, 0.6 mm in thickness was prepared by hydrating and trimming it. It was then tucked through the vestibular access incision, till it extended 1 mm below the socket orifice, and stabilized using a membrane tack (AutoTac System Kit, Biohorizons Implant Systems, Birmingham, Alabama Inc, USA) to the apical bone. The gap between the implant and the shield/the labial plate was then filled with particulate bone graft \[75% autogenous bone chips harvested form local surgical sites and 25% inorganic bovine bone mineral matrix (MinerOss X , Biohorizons, Birmingham, Al, USA)\]. For the infected sockets, the 6-day protocol was implemented. Atraumatic extraction of the infected tooth by the periotome was followed by curettage, mechanical debridement and chemical irrigation using metronidazole irrigation solution (500mg/100ml, Amrizole, Amria Pharma, Alexandria, Egypt). The root of the involved tooth was cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner, cut to its apical third, reimplanted into the socket and maintained there for 6 days by bonding its crown to the adjacent teeth using composite resin. Implant and crown placement were done as described above for the non-infected socket group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Site Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

infected sockets

Signs of infection were periapical radiolucency only in 3 sites (2 patients), fistula in 2 sites (2 patients), sinus in 11 sites (7 patients) and finally swelling in 3 sites (2 patients)

immediate implant with vestibular socket therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

A 1-cm long vestibular access incision was cut, 3-4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction of the involved tooth. The socket orifice and the vestibular access incision were connected by a subperiosteal tunnel that was created using a periotome and a micro-periosteal elevator. Implants were installed using a CADLCAM surgical guide. A flexible cortical membrane shield of heterologous origin, 0.6 mm in thickness was prepared by hydrating and trimming it. It was then tucked through the vestibular access incision, till it extended 1 mm below the socket orifice, and stabilized using a membrane tack ( to the apical bone. The gap between the implant and the shield/the labial plate was then filled with particulate bone graft \[75% autogenous bone chips harvested form local surgical sites and 25% inorganic bovine bone mineral matrix.

Non infected sockets

This is ensured by the absence of any clinical signs and symptoms of infection in addition to negative radiographic findings

immediate implant with vestibular socket therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

A 1-cm long vestibular access incision was cut, 3-4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction of the involved tooth. The socket orifice and the vestibular access incision were connected by a subperiosteal tunnel that was created using a periotome and a micro-periosteal elevator. Implants were installed using a CADLCAM surgical guide. A flexible cortical membrane shield of heterologous origin, 0.6 mm in thickness was prepared by hydrating and trimming it. It was then tucked through the vestibular access incision, till it extended 1 mm below the socket orifice, and stabilized using a membrane tack ( to the apical bone. The gap between the implant and the shield/the labial plate was then filled with particulate bone graft \[75% autogenous bone chips harvested form local surgical sites and 25% inorganic bovine bone mineral matrix.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

immediate implant with vestibular socket therapy

A 1-cm long vestibular access incision was cut, 3-4 mm apical to the mucogingival junction of the involved tooth. The socket orifice and the vestibular access incision were connected by a subperiosteal tunnel that was created using a periotome and a micro-periosteal elevator. Implants were installed using a CADLCAM surgical guide. A flexible cortical membrane shield of heterologous origin, 0.6 mm in thickness was prepared by hydrating and trimming it. It was then tucked through the vestibular access incision, till it extended 1 mm below the socket orifice, and stabilized using a membrane tack ( to the apical bone. The gap between the implant and the shield/the labial plate was then filled with particulate bone graft \[75% autogenous bone chips harvested form local surgical sites and 25% inorganic bovine bone mineral matrix.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients were adults ≥ 18 years,
* 1-5 non-adjacent hopeless maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone.
* The involved teeth had type II sockets.
* To achieve optimum primary stability for the implants (30Ncm insertion torque), adequate palatal and at least 3 mm apical bone should be available to engage the immediately placed implants.

Exclusion Criteria

* Smoking and/or pregnant patients
* systemic diseases
* a history of chemo- or radiotherapy within the past 2 years were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

BioHorizons, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Iman Abd-ElWahab Radi, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Iman Radi, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo University

AbdelSalam Alaskary, BDS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Private Practice

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of dentistry

Cairo, Manial, Egypt

Site Status

ElAskary and Associates Private clinic

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elaskary A, Thabet A, Hussin M, Radi IA. Soft and hard tissue evaluation for vestibular socket therapy of immediately placed implants in infected and non-infected sockets: a 1-year prospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1190. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04905-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39375634 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0010557

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.