Flat Dose vs. Weight-based IP Chemotherapy for CRS/HIPEC
NCT ID: NCT04779554
Last Updated: 2025-12-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-04
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This trial will be a randomized phase 2 comparison of flat dose versus weight-based dose Mitomycin C. The hypothesis of this study is that HIPEC weight-based dosing may result in similarly effective peritoneal Mitomycin C concentrations with less systemic absorption and potential systemic toxicity, compared with the HIPEC flat dosing approach in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flat Dose Mitomycin C
Participants in this group will receive flat doses of mitomycin C intra-operatively: 1) 30mg at minute 0 and 2) 10mg at minute 45. Mitomycin C will be delivered via HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy).
Mitomycin C, flat dose 40 mg
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two flat doses. Dose 1 will be 30mg at minute 0 and dose 2 will be 10 mg at minute 45.
Weight-Based Mitomycin C
Participants in this group will receive weight-based dosing of mitomycin C intra-operatively: 1) 9.5 mg/m2 at minute 0 and 2) 3 mg/m2 at minute 45 for total dose of 12.5 mg/m2. Mitomycin C will be delivered via HIPEC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy).
Mitomycin C, weight-based dose 12.5 mg/m2
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two weight-based doses of 9.5 mg/m2 at minute 0 and 3 mg/m2 at minute 45.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mitomycin C, flat dose 40 mg
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two flat doses. Dose 1 will be 30mg at minute 0 and dose 2 will be 10 mg at minute 45.
Mitomycin C, weight-based dose 12.5 mg/m2
Mitomycin C will be delivered as heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in two weight-based doses of 9.5 mg/m2 at minute 0 and 3 mg/m2 at minute 45.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG performance status \< 3
* Candidate for grossly complete cytoreductive surgery
* Life expectancy greater than 3 months
* Adequate organ and marrow function
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion Criteria
* Untreated lung metastases
* Liver metastases not amenable to resection or ablation
* Known brain metastases
* Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to entering the study
* Presence of residual significant adverse events attributed to prior cancer treatment
* Currently receiving any other investigational therapeutic agents
* History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to Mitomycin C.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Uncontrolled ongoing illness
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prakash Pandalai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prakash Pandalai
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Prakash Pandalai, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Prakash Pandalai, MD
Role: primary
Jessica Cintolo-Gonzalez
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McDonald HG, Cassim EB, Harper MM, Burke EE, Marcinkowski EF, Cavnar MJ, Pandalai PK, Kim J. The Development of Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trials in Surgical Oncology. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2023 Jan;32(1):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MCC-20-GI-115
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id