A Prospective Study for the Treatment of Children With Newly Diagnosed LCH Using a Cytarabine Contained Protocol

NCT ID: NCT04773366

Last Updated: 2022-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

From January 2010 to December 2014, 150 children with MS-LCH were treated in our hospital following a LCH II (Arm B) based protocol. Treatment was based on a modification of the LCH-II (Arm B) based protocol. However, the continuation treatment was extended to 56 weeks and etoposide was omitted from the continuation treatment.

For the 59 patients with RO involvement (RO+) (the lungs are not considered a RO in the current study), the rapid response rate (week 6) was 61.0% and the 3-year overall survival (OS) 73.4±5.9%. Rapid responders had a better 3-year survival rate than poor responders (90.9±5.0% vs. 45.7±11.0%, P\<0.001). The 3-year OS in the current study is 10\~20% lower than the rates reported by Gadner et al. and Morimoto et al.. We have not yet adopted effective salvage therapies for RO+ patients with recurrent disease. During the time of this study, cladribine was unavailable. Second-line therapy for non-responders or patients with disease reactivation was individualized treatment based on the physician's experience. An effective salvage therapy is essential for this high-risk group.

For 91without RO involvement (RO-), 78 patients (85.7%) were rapid responders at week 6. The 3-year cumulative reactivation rate was 10.7% for RO- patients. No death occurred in this subgroup, with a 3-year OS of 100% in RO- patients. Compared to the LCH II and LCH III trials, the current study had a more intensive initial treatment regimen for RO- patients. However, the addition of etoposide to prednisone and vincristine in the initial therapy did not increase the 6-week response rate for RO- patients (85.7% in this study compared to 83% in the LCH II study and 86% in the LCH III study). Surprisingly, with a relatively intense initial treatment, a relatively low 3-year cumulative reactivation rate was observed in RO- patients in the current study. This result suggests that the initial treatment intensity and duration of continuation therapy both impact disease reactivation. The intensity of induction can affect the degree of disease resolution. Insufficient treatment intensity might lead to late relapse. Similarity to that observed has been in other childhood hematological malignancies. This finding deserves to be tested in prospective clinical trials with long-term follow-up. Cytarabine has been applied for patients with LCH but has never been evaluated in our hospital prospectively. In this study, we administer a cytarabine contained protocol to patients with multisystem involvement with or without risk organs involvement. The treatment results will be compared with our historical studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients with de novo pathological confirmed LCH enrolled in this study will be classified into 4 groups. Group 1: Multisystem patients (≥2 organs/systems) with involvement of one or more "Risk" organs" (hematopoietic system, liver or spleen);Group 2:Multisystem patients, but without involvement of "Risk" organs; Group 3: Single system, Multifocal+ Single system, unifocal and special site@ (Isolated lesion of special site)+ Single system, unifocal and CNS risk+Single system, unifocal i.e. thyroid, lung, thymus, hypothalamic-pituitary+Single system, unifocal and other functionally critical anatomical sites; Group 4: Single system, unifocal i.e. bone, skin or lymph node (not the draining lymph node of another LCH lesion). For patients in Group 1, a 6-week initial treatment, a 16-week consolidation continuation treatment and a 26-week maintenance continuation treatment containing cytarabine is applied. For patients in Group 2, a 6-week initial treatment containing cytarabine and a 46-week continuation treatment (without cytarabine) is applied. For patients in Group 3,a 6-week initial treatment and a 46-week continuation treatment (without cytarabine) is applied. For patients in Group 4, only local therapy followed by wait-and-see strategy is applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All enrolled patients are stratified into 4 risk groups. Patients in each risk group are assigned to one treatment regimen.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Multisystem patients (≥2 organs/systems) with involvement of one or more "Risk" organs, i.e. hematopoietic system, liver or spleen.

All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1\~6) followed by a consolidation continuation therapy (Week 7\~22) and maintenance continuation therapy (Week 25\~52).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1 initial treatment (W1\~W6). Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1 Consolidation continuation treatment (W7\~W22) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1 Maintenance continuation treatment (W25\~52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q6w ×3 times (w25,31,37); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Group 2

Multisystem patients, but without involvement of "Risk" organs.

All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1\~6) followed by continuation therapy (Week 7\~52).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 2 Initial treatment (W1\~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)

Prednisone+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 2 continuation treatment (W7\~W52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Group 3

Includes patients with single system, multifocal or with single system, unifocal and special site (Isolated lesion of special site) or with single system, unifocal and CNS risk or with single system, unifocal i.e. thyroid, lung, thymus, hypothalamic-pituitary or with single system, unifocal and other functionally critical anatomical sites.

All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1\~6) followed by continuation therapy (Week 7\~52).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prednisone+vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 3 Initial treatment (W1\~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6

Prednisone+vincristine

Intervention Type DRUG

. Group 3 Continuation treatment (W7\~W52)Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w

Group 4

Patients with single system, unifocal i.e. bone, skin or lymph node (not the draining lymph node of another LCH lesion).

All patients in this group enter into observation after local therapy. Chemotherapy only apply to patients with disease reactivation during observation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Local therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Local therapy/wait and see. Group 4

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine

Group 1 initial treatment (W1\~W6). Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Group 1 Consolidation continuation treatment (W7\~W22) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Group 1 Maintenance continuation treatment (W25\~52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q6w ×3 times (w25,31,37); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine

Group 2 Initial treatment (W1\~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+vincristine+Mercaptopurine

Group 2 continuation treatment (W7\~W52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+vincristine

Group 3 Initial treatment (W1\~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone+vincristine

. Group 3 Continuation treatment (W7\~W52)Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w

Intervention Type DRUG

Local therapy

Local therapy/wait and see. Group 4

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age under 18 years
2. Newly diagnosed LCH:Morphologic identification of the characteristic LCH cells, positive staining of the lesional cells with CD1α and/or Langerin
3. No congenital immunodeficiency, HIV infection, or prior organ transplant
4. No previous chemotherapy/target therapy/radiation, if any steroid applied, total prior steroids dosage \< prednisone 280 mg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients have overwhelming infection, and a life expectancy of \< 2 weeks
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai Children's Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yi-Jin Gao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shanghai Children's Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Children's Medical Center

Shanghai, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Meng Su, MD

Role: CONTACT

0086-18817821853

Ya-Li Han, MD

Role: CONTACT

0086-21-38626288

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yi-Jin Gao

Role: primary

021-38626161

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Simko SJ, McClain KL, Allen CE. Up-front therapy for LCH: is it time to test an alternative to vinblastine/prednisone? Br J Haematol. 2015 Apr;169(2):299-301. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13208. Epub 2014 Nov 16. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25400231 (View on PubMed)

Gadner H, Grois N, Potschger U, Minkov M, Arico M, Braier J, Broadbent V, Donadieu J, Henter JI, McCarter R, Ladisch S; Histiocyte Society. Improved outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis is associated with therapy intensification. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2556-62. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-106211. Epub 2007 Dec 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18089850 (View on PubMed)

Gadner H, Grois N, Arico M, Broadbent V, Ceci A, Jakobson A, Komp D, Michaelis J, Nicholson S, Potschger U, Pritchard J, Ladisch S; Histiocyte Society. A randomized trial of treatment for multisystem Langerhans' cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr. 2001 May;138(5):728-34. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.111331.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11343051 (View on PubMed)

Egeler RM, de Kraker J, Voute PA. Cytosine-arabinoside, vincristine, and prednisolone in the treatment of children with disseminated Langerhans cell histiocytosis with organ dysfunction: experience at a single institution. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21(4):265-70. doi: 10.1002/mpo.2950210406.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8469221 (View on PubMed)

Weitzman S, Braier J, Donadieu J, Egeler RM, Grois N, Ladisch S, Potschger U, Webb D, Whitlock J, Arceci RJ. 2'-Chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) as salvage therapy for Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). results of the LCH-S-98 protocol of the Histiocyte Society. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;53(7):1271-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22229.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19731321 (View on PubMed)

Donadieu J, Bernard F, van Noesel M, Barkaoui M, Bardet O, Mura R, Arico M, Piguet C, Gandemer V, Armari Alla C, Clausen N, Jeziorski E, Lambilliote A, Weitzman S, Henter JI, Van Den Bos C; Salvage Group of the Histiocyte Society. Cladribine and cytarabine in refractory multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis: results of an international phase 2 study. Blood. 2015 Sep 17;126(12):1415-23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-635151. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26194764 (View on PubMed)

Braier J, Rosso D, Pollono D, Rey G, Lagomarsino E, Latella A, Zubizarreta P. Symptomatic bone langerhans cell histiocytosis treated at diagnosis or after reactivation with indomethacin alone. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Jul;36(5):e280-4. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000165001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24977402 (View on PubMed)

Heritier S, Jehanne M, Leverger G, Emile JF, Alvarez JC, Haroche J, Donadieu J. Vemurafenib Use in an Infant for High-Risk Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):836-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0736. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26180941 (View on PubMed)

Gao YJ, Su M, Tang JY, Pan C, Chen J. Treatment Outcome of Children With Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: The Experience of a Single Children's Hospital in Shanghai, China. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jan;40(1):e9-e12. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001016.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29200145 (View on PubMed)

Su M, Gao YJ, Pan C, Chen J, Tang JY. Outcome of children with Langerhans cell histiocytosis and single-system involvement: A retrospective study at a single center in Shanghai, China. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018 Oct-Nov;35(7-8):385-392. doi: 10.1080/08880018.2018.1545814. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30693828 (View on PubMed)

Gadner H, Minkov M, Grois N, Potschger U, Thiem E, Arico M, Astigarraga I, Braier J, Donadieu J, Henter JI, Janka-Schaub G, McClain KL, Weitzman S, Windebank K, Ladisch S; Histiocyte Society. Therapy prolongation improves outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood. 2013 Jun 20;121(25):5006-14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-455774. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23589673 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCMC-LCH-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.