Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Research Study to Compare Two Types of Insulin, a New Weekly Insulin, Insulin Icodec and an Available Daily Insulin, Insulin Degludec, in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Use Daily Insulin (NCT NCT04770532)
NCT ID: NCT04770532
Last Updated: 2025-12-15
Results Overview
Change in HbA1c from baseline week 0 to week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
526 participants
Baseline (Week 0), Week 26
2025-12-15
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 71 sites in 9 countries as follows: United States of America (USA) (26), Ukraine (4), Portugal (6), Poland (3), Republic of Korea (7), Japan (9), Germany (6), Bulgaria (4), South Africa (6).
After randomisation participants continued their pre-trial non-insulin anti-diabetic background medication throughout the entire trial except from sulfonylureas and glinides, which had to be discontinued at randomisation.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
263
|
263
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed
|
262
|
263
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set (FAS)
|
263
|
263
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set (SAS)
|
262
|
263
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
260
|
258
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Research Study to Compare Two Types of Insulin, a New Weekly Insulin, Insulin Icodec and an Available Daily Insulin, Insulin Degludec, in People With Type 2 Diabetes Who Use Daily Insulin
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
Total
n=526 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.35 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79 • n=6009 Participants
|
62.60 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.42 • n=42 Participants
|
62.47 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.12 • n=77 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
101 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
123 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
224 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
162 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
140 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
302 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
247 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
247 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
494 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
86 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
196 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
11 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
161 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
298 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=6009 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=42 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=77 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.
Change in HbA1c from baseline week 0 to week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
-0.93 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.71 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in FPG from baseline week 0 to week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=260 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=257 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-1.58 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Error 0.12
|
-1.62 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Error 0.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From week 22 to week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
The percentage of time in target-range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system is presented. Time in target range is defined as 100 times the number of recorded measurements in glycaemic target range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL), both inclusive, divided by the total number of recorded measurements. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=238 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=239 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Time in Target-range 3.9-10.0 Millimoles Per Liter (mmol/L) (70-180 Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL]) Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System
|
63.13 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 17.40
|
59.50 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 18.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in DTSQs in total treatment satisfaction from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented. The DTSQ domain score in total treatment satisfaction was calculated by adding the six item scores of items 1, 4-8. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a participant perceived experience of hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36. The outcome data was evaluated based on in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: Last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=252 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=244 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) in Total Treatment Satisfaction
|
4.22 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
2.96 Score on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (week 0) to week 31Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
Number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes (level 3) is presented. Severe hypoglycaemia (level 3) is defined as hypoglycaemia with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period. The on-treatment period started at the date of first dose of trial product as recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF), and ended at the first date of any of the following: The end of trial visit (V30), the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin (corresponding to 5 weeks after the end of the dosing interval for both treatment arms) and the end-date for the in-trial observation period. The on-treatment period represented the time period in which a participant was considered exposed to trial product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=262 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 3)
|
0 Episodes
|
1 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (week 0) to week 31Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
Number of clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes (level 2) (\<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), confirmed by blood glucose (BG) meter) is presented. Clinically significant hypoglycaemia (level 2) is defined as plasma glucose value of less than (\<) 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) confirmed by BG meter. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period. The on-treatment period started at the date of first dose of trial product as recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF), and ended at the first date of any of the following: The end of trial visit (V30), the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin (corresponding to 5 weeks after the end of the dosing interval for both treatment arms) and the end-date for the in-trial observation period. The on-treatment period represented the time period in which a participant was considered exposed to trial product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=262 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 2) (<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), Confirmed by BG Meter)
|
113 Episodes
|
41 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline (week 0) to week 31Population: Safety analysis set included all participants randomly assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
Number of clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes (level 2) (\<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), confirmed by blood glucose (BG) meter) or severe hypoglycaemic episodes (level 3) is presented. Clinically significant hypoglycaemia (level 2) is defined as plasma glucose value of \< 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) confirmed by BG meter. Severe hypoglycaemia (level 3) is defined as hypoglycaemia with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. The on-treatment period started at the date of first dose of trial product as recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF), and ended at the first date of any of the following: The end of trial visit (V30), the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin (corresponding to 5 weeks after the end of the dosing interval for both treatment arms) and the end-date for the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=262 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinically Significant Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 2) (<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), Confirmed by BG Meter) or Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 3)
|
113 Episodes
|
42 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From week 22 to week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage of tiime spent \< 3.0 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (54 mg/dL) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=238 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=239 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Time Spent < 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System
|
0.34 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.22 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From week 22 to week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants. Overall number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage of time spent \> 10 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (180 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=238 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=239 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Time Spent > 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System
|
35.52 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 17.95
|
39.71 Percentage (%) of time
Standard Deviation 19.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From week 24 to week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.
Estimated mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment (from week 24 to week 26) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period. The on-treatment period started at the date of first dose of trial product as recorded on the electronic case report form (eCRF), and ended at the first date of any of the following: The end of trial visit (V30), the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin (corresponding to 5 weeks after the end of the dosing interval for both treatment arms) and the end-date for the in-trial observation period. The on-treatment period represented the time period in which a participant was considered exposed to trial product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Weekly Insulin Dose
|
267.96 Units of insulin
Interval 252.19 to 284.7
|
244.22 Units of insulin
Interval 229.99 to 259.33
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 26Population: Full analysis set included all randomised participants.
Change in body weight from baseline week 0 to week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the in-trial observation period. In-trial observation period started at randomisation and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent, the last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up (i.e., possibly an unscheduled phone visit) and death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 Participants
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Weight
|
1.40 Kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.32
|
-0.30 Kilograms (kg)
Standard Error 0.36
|
Adverse Events
Insulin Icodec
Insulin Degludec
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=262 participants at risk
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 participants at risk
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Adrenocortical insufficiency acute
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 3 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.76%
2/263 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.76%
2/262 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.76%
2/262 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Campylobacter gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer stage II
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric dysplasia
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc disorder
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatic pseudocyst
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paraspinal abscess
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonsillar abscess
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.76%
2/262 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polymyalgia rheumatica
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal vein occlusion
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Thalamic infarction
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Thrombotic stroke
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Toe amputation
|
0.00%
0/262 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.38%
1/263 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral stenosis
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.38%
1/262 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/263 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Insulin Icodec
n=262 participants at risk
Participants were to receive once weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of Insulin icodec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a starting dose of 7 times the pre-trial total daily basal insulin dose + 50% of their 7 times total daily basal insulin dose. The following weekly dose was 7 times the total daily dose of the respective participants ('unit to unit switch' approach: current daily dose x 7). Participants were to perform once daily pre-breakfast self-monitoring plasma glucose (SMPG). The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 millimoles per liter (mmol/L): dose reduced by 3 units (U); 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 3 U.
|
Insulin Degludec
n=263 participants at risk
Participants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of Insulin degludec for 26 weeks, using PDS290 prefilled pen-injector at a dose in accordance with local label. Participants were to perform once daily SMPG. The dose was adjusted based on 3 pre-breakfast SMPG values measured on the 2 previous days and the day of the contact. If at least one pre-breakfast SMPG value was: \< 4.4 mmol/L: dose reduced by 20 U; 4.4-7.2 mmol/L: no adjustment; \> 7.2 mmol/L: dose increased by 20 U.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy
|
3.8%
10/262 • Number of events 11 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
6.1%
16/263 • Number of events 17 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.3%
14/262 • Number of events 17 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
3.4%
9/263 • Number of events 9 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.3%
14/262 • Number of events 20 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
3.4%
9/263 • Number of events 10 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
8.4%
22/262 • Number of events 28 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
3.8%
10/263 • Number of events 14 • From baseline (Week 0) to Week 31
All presented adverse events (AEs) are treatment emergent. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that initiated or worsened on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to the end of the trial period (week 31). Results are based on the safety analysis set which included all randomised participants assigned to trial treatment and who took at least 1 dose of trial product.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER