Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Versus Sham in Pain Control During Liver Ablation and TACE Procedures

NCT ID: NCT04769713

Last Updated: 2023-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-23

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is aimed at assessing the effectiveness of a novel liver specific nerve block in improving pain control during painful liver interventional radiology procedures including liver tumoral ablation and trans arterial chemoembolization, two procedures aimed at controlling liver tumors, but that can be associated with significant pain. This novel hepatic specific nerve block was designed by us and initial retrospective results suggests it might help in controlling such liver procedural derived pain. The study was designed to compare the liver block to a sham procedure in a blinded context and to follow the participants over three days post-procedure to asses for pain levels.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective study. Experienced interventional radiologists in the two McGill University Health Centre study centers (Royal Victoria Hospital and Montreal General Hospital) will perform all procedures:

* 80 consecutive subjects meeting the eligibility criteria, scheduled for chemoembolization of the liver for primary or secondary liver malignancies OR radiofrequency ablation of the liver for primary or secondary liver malignancies.
* Consent will be obtained from all patients by an interventional radiologist.
* All procedures will be performed by a qualified interventional radiology medical doctor (IRMD).
* Patients who accept to participate and fit the criteria will be randomized to either receive hepatic plexus block or a placebo control procedure, consisting of injection of normal saline.
* Hepatic hilum plexus nerve block will consist of the ultrasound-guided injection of ropivacaine at the hepatic hilum anterior to the portal vein as close to the bifurcation as possible. In the sham control group, the same location will be targeted, but only normal saline will be injected.
* A member of the radiology technologists will load the syringe with either ropivacaine or normal saline and the IRMD will thus be blinded to the patient's allocated group.
* All patients will be offered IV analgesia using midazolam and fentanyl during the procedure at set regular intervals as per our standard regimen.
* Similar IV analgesics as well as oral analgesics will be provided as per set orders during the recovery period in the post-procedural recovery room (PACU)
* The patient will be discharged home with standard prescriptions for home analgesics which include routine medication and medication to be used for breakthrough pain. While at home they will be entering pain surveys three times per day for three days.
* Data will be gathered, stored, and analyzed. The analysis will be stratified into patients who have received chemoembolization and patients who have received radiofrequency ablation.
* Follow-up of the patient will occur as per routine 4-6 weeks post chemoembolization/radiofrequency ablation to assess the clinical success of the therapeutic procedure (ablation and TACE) and patient satisfaction with pain control.

Subject data collection on the day of the procedure will include demographics, relevant medical history, vital signs before and during the procedure, use of IV analgesics, use of oral analgesics, use of nerve block or sham procedure and visual analogue pain scales at set intervals during hospital stay. Subject data collection while at home will include visual analogue pain scale and self-recording of medication intake.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Control Liver Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
A technologist will either load up a syringe with ropivacaine or with saline. He will be the only one knowing what was put in the syringe. The operator will inject the content of the syringe at the location of the hepatic hilar nerve block, not knowing what is being injected.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hepatic hilar nerve block in ablation patients

15ml of 0.7% ropivacaine will be injected at the hepatic hilum anterior to the portal vein as close to the bifurcation as possible under US guidance using a 21g needle prior to the Ablation procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Needle placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of a needle within 2cm of the portal vein bifurcation along its anterior surface for injection of nerve block agent (for nerve block) or saline (placebo) under US or CT guidance.

Injection of Ropivacaine in the hepatic hilum for the hepatic hilar nerve block

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of 15 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Placebo procedure in ablation patients

15ml of sterile normal saline will be injected at the hepatic hilum anterior to the portal vein as close to the bifurcation as possible under US guidance using a 21g needle prior to the Ablation procedure.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Needle placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of a needle within 2cm of the portal vein bifurcation along its anterior surface for injection of nerve block agent (for nerve block) or saline (placebo) under US or CT guidance.

Injection of normal saline in the hepatic hilum for the sham procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

15 ml sterile normal saline is injected at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Hepatic hilar nerve block in chemoembolization patients

15ml of 0.7% ropivacaine will be injected at the hepatic hilum anterior to the portal vein as close to the bifurcation as possible under US guidance using a 21g needle prior to the chemoembolization procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Needle placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of a needle within 2cm of the portal vein bifurcation along its anterior surface for injection of nerve block agent (for nerve block) or saline (placebo) under US or CT guidance.

Injection of Ropivacaine in the hepatic hilum for the hepatic hilar nerve block

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of 15 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Placebo procedure in chemoembolization patients

15ml of sterile normal saline will be injected at the hepatic hilum anterior to the portal vein as close to the bifurcation as possible under US guidance using a 21g needle prior to the chemoembolization procedure.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Needle placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placement of a needle within 2cm of the portal vein bifurcation along its anterior surface for injection of nerve block agent (for nerve block) or saline (placebo) under US or CT guidance.

Injection of normal saline in the hepatic hilum for the sham procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

15 ml sterile normal saline is injected at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hepatic Hilar Nerve Block Needle placement

Placement of a needle within 2cm of the portal vein bifurcation along its anterior surface for injection of nerve block agent (for nerve block) or saline (placebo) under US or CT guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Injection of Ropivacaine in the hepatic hilum for the hepatic hilar nerve block

Injection of 15 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of normal saline in the hepatic hilum for the sham procedure

15 ml sterile normal saline is injected at the hepatic hilum along the anterior surface of the portal vein within 2cm of the bifurcation.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients referred to the Interventional Radiology department and approved for a chemo-embolization or radiofrequency ablation of malignant primary or secondary liver tumour.
2. At least 18 y.o.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients in whom the vascular anatomy prevents safe access to the hepatic hilum or patients in whom general anaesthesia was performed.
2. Patients who have known allergy to any anaesthetic agent in the regular protocol (fentanyl, midazolam, ropivacaine).
3. Patients with signs of skin infection at the entry site of the needle used to perform the nerve block
4. Patients with signs of infection such as fever or acute increase in wight blood cell count.
5. Patients with uncorrectable abnormal coagulation status (INR \>1.5 and platelets \< 50000 without use of anticoagulation agents).
6. Patients with pre-existing conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study (these reasons will be recorded)
7. Patients, who are uncooperative, cannot follow instructions, or who are unlikely to comply with follow-up appointments or fill-out the post-procedural pain questionnaires.
8. Patients with a mental state that may preclude completion of the study procedure or are unable to provide informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Louis-martin Boucher

Assistant Professor Diagnostic Radiology - Interventional Radiology Division

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Louis-Martin Boucher, MD/PhD

Role: CONTACT

514-934-1934 ext. 44454

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Louis-Martin Boucher, MD/PhD

Role: primary

514 934-1934 ext. 44454

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-7139

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.