Short Treatment with Omalizumab for Severe Asthma

NCT ID: NCT04763447

Last Updated: 2024-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

234 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-20

Study Completion Date

2027-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The optimal duration of the treatment by OMA remains unclear when asthma is well controlled. Data suggest that a large part of patients with well controlled asthma can discontinue OMA therapy without any asthma control deterioration or with an acceptable decrease in asthma control, therefore French experts propose that omalizumab can be given for "3 to 5 yrs if asthma remains well controlled".

The costs related to OMA are high and frequent injections represent severe constraints for patients. For all these reasons, evaluating whether shortening duration of OMA therapy is feasible while maintaining acceptable asthma control is a critical point. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate asthma control after OMA discontinuation after at least 33 months of treatment when asthma is well controlled.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Omalizumab (OMA) is a monoclonal anti IgE antibody, developed for severe uncontrolled allergic asthma. Efficacy of OMA in this indication is well documented in randomized trials as well as in real life studies, reducing the number of severe exacerbations by about 50% and improving asthma control score .

However, despite commercialized since 2006 in France, the optimal duration of the treatment remains unclear when asthma is well controlled. In particular, there is no guideline to apply the "step down theory" to biologics in well controlled patients.

It seems clear that a treatment given for less than one year is associated with an early relapse of the disease. However, in a randomized controlled study including 176 patients, stopping the treatment after 5 years induced a small, but acceptable loss of control (average decrease of asthma control test (ACT) by 2.88 and 1.16 point, p= 0.18), but some patients had uncontrolled asthma when the treatment was stopped. In a smaller cohort of 49 patients in Spain who voluntarily accepted to discontinue OMA treatment after 6 years of therapy, asthma deterioration (defined by one or more exacerbation and any Asthma Control Test change during the 1st year) was observed in 24% of patients during the first year following discontinuation , with a maximal rate of 2 exacerbations/yr. After 4 years of discontinuation, 60% of patients still take advantage of the 6 yrs of treatment with OMA. A retrospective study in France found that 14/26 patients treated for at least 3 years kept the same level of control after discontinuation. All these data suggest that a large part of patients with well controlled asthma can discontinue OMA therapy without any asthma control deterioration or with an acceptable decrease in asthma control.

Inducing long term asthma remissions, rather than complete cure, is one potential goal of biologics. OMA is supposed to have disease modifying effects , explaining why there is a hope for a good asthma control being maintained after discontinuation. For this reason, French experts propose that omalizumab can be given for "3 to 5 yrs if asthma remains well controlled" . After an asthma relapse, OMA can be prescribed again theoretically, but no data regarding clinical response after a "second line" of treatment with the same biologic are available. The question of optimal treatment duration is also questioned with other biologics.

The costs related to OMA are high (estimated to 12 k€/year/patient). Frequent injections (1 subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for the lowest dose to 4 injections every 2 weeks for the highest dose) represent severe constraints for patients, especially for the youngest ones. For all these reasons, evaluating whether shortening duration of OMA therapy is feasible while maintaining acceptable asthma control is a critical point. The main objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority (i.e. no more exacerbations at 12 months) of OMA withdrawal attempt compared to OMA continuation in asthma-controlled patients treated for at least 33 months with OMA. Secondary objectives are to compare OMA withdrawal attempt versus OMA continuation in asthma-controlled patients treated for at least 33 months with OMA on other asthma control features at 6 and 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OMA withdrawal attempt

Patients will be told to stop abruptly (no progressive decrease of the dose) their Omalizumab treatment and they will not be prescribed new OMA

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Attempt to withdrawal OMA treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be told to stop abruptly (no progressive decrease of the dose) their Omalizumab treatment and they will not be prescribed new OMA. In case of loss of control, pulmonologist can adapt asthma treatment, as in usual care. In that case, OMA can be prescribed for a second line

OMA continuation

Patients will be prescribed the same dosage of Omalizumab than they received before randomization

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Continuation of OMA treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will be prescribed the same dosage of Omalizumab than they received before randomization, according to their weight and total circulating IgE levels.

In case of safety concerns or loss of control, pulmonologist can modify the patient treatment regimen of OMA or other co-medications, as in usual care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Attempt to withdrawal OMA treatment

Patients will be told to stop abruptly (no progressive decrease of the dose) their Omalizumab treatment and they will not be prescribed new OMA. In case of loss of control, pulmonologist can adapt asthma treatment, as in usual care. In that case, OMA can be prescribed for a second line

Intervention Type OTHER

Continuation of OMA treatment

Patients will be prescribed the same dosage of Omalizumab than they received before randomization, according to their weight and total circulating IgE levels.

In case of safety concerns or loss of control, pulmonologist can modify the patient treatment regimen of OMA or other co-medications, as in usual care.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient \>18 years old
* Treated with OMA, prescribed by a pulmonologist , for at least 33 months for severe allergic asthma
* Well controlled with the treatment (ACT score ⩾ 18) and having experienced no more than one exacerbation in the year preceding inclusion. An exacerbation is defined as an oral or injectable steroid course for at least 2 days and/or a minimum doubling of the usual steroid dose for at least 2 days for steroid dependent patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusing to stop OMA treatment, whatever the reason
* Patient with other reason other than good asthma control to stop OMA, such as a side effect, planned or ongoing pregnancy, or planned switch to another step 5 asthma treatment (mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, reslizumab, daily oral steroids, bronchial thermoplasty, …)
* Patient not covered by Health Insurance
* Patient under curatorship, guardianship or safeguarding of justice
* Patient whose adherence to asthma treatments is considered poor or questionable by the investigator
* Patient participating in another intervention research
* Pregnant or lactating patient
* Patient refusing to sign consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Camille TAILLE, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Camille TAILLE, Professor

Role: CONTACT

01 40 25 68 63 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yannick VACHER, Chef de projet DRCI

Role: primary

01.44.84.17.30 ext. +33

Eve KLISING, Chef de projet CEPHEPI

Role: backup

01 42 16 75 83 ext. +33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-513427-17-00

Identifier Type: CTIS

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2020-000883-42

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

APHP180614

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Omalizumab in Non-atopic Asthma
NCT01113437 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3
Withdrawal of Dupilumab in Severe Asthma
NCT06818019 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4