Effectiveness of Cervical Screening in Unvaccinated, Herd Effect Protected Women (HPV400)

NCT ID: NCT04755517

Last Updated: 2025-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-09

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To identify: 1) Whether being informed infrequently results about screening is at least as a) safe and b) accurate as frequently obtaining all information from (the present combination of opportunistic/organized) cervical screening by comparing regimen results of two screening visits at the ages of 25 and 28 years (Arm A1) vs. results of one screening visit at the age of 28 years (Arm A2) in unvaccinated herd effect protected women. Unvaccinated, frequently screened women, who are not under herd effect protection will be controls (C).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Altogether 14.000 1995-1997 born women resident in communities where herd effect against high-risk HPV infections was created with gender-neutral vaccination of birth cohorts 1992-1995 (A-communities) or not (control C-communities) in 2007-2010 with the bi-valent HPV16/18 vaccine will be invited to participate a randomized screening trial at the ages of 25 and 28 years.

Cervical samples will be analysed for HPV DNA with MGP (Modified General Primer) primer system followed by MALDITOF(matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) mass spectrometry on the SEQUENOM (translation of genomic science into solutions for molecular medicine and biomedical research) platform (HPV).

With assumed 65% and 90% participation and retain rates the trial has 80% power to show non-inferiority of the infrequent vs. the frequent screening information.

At the study-end testing the null hypotheses of no difference in the incidence of the CIN2/3 (cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3) end-points comparing the A1 vs. C and A2 vs. C intervention arms will be done using the Mantel-Haenszel one degree of freedom chi-square statistics.

Work Content Letters of invitation to visit cervical screening at the nearest FICAN (Comprehensive Cancer Center Finland)-Mid study site will be send to the approximately 14.000 unvaccinated women at the ages of 25 and 28 years Following informed consent cervical liquid-based cytology samples will be taken for HPV DNA and/or cytology screening at study visits.

All cytological screening results will be communicated to Arm A1 and Arm C study participants. Arm A2 participants will get the test results at the age of 28. However, results of the cytology testing indicative of colposcopy according to local standard of care and currently accepted EU (the European Union) -guidelines (Käypä Hoito 2010, Franceschi et al. 2011) will be immediately communicated to all study participants. HPV DNA results will be communicated to all study participants at the study end. Pertinent colposcopy referrals to organized health care will be made.

All study participants will be offered a possibility to give an oropharyngeal sputum sample after 30 seconds gargling of sterile physiological saline (5 ml) for HPV PCR (polymerase chain reaction) analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3 Adenocarcinoma in Situ

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Frequent / Infrequent information of cytological screening results

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A1

Frequent information of screening results for cytology and/or HPV DNA at the ages of 25 (cytology only) and 28 (cytology only) vs A2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frequent information of cytological/ HPV DNA screening results

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants will be referred to pertinent diagnosis and treatment according to local standard of care (Käypä hoito 2010) should the cytological screening results (HSIL, ASC-H, AGC-FN) or three consecutive LSIL findings at repeated control visits within 3 years indicate it. The most common screening results (ASCUS, LSIL) are, however, not convened to arm A2 participants before age 28.

All cytology and HPV DNA results results are being revealed to all trial participants at age 28 at the study end.

A2

infrequent information of cytological screening/ HPV DNA results, only at the age 28 years.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

C

The third arm with at 8000 participants devoid of herd effect protection and frequent screening at ages 25 and 28 is enrolled for comparative analyses between A1 vs. C and A2 vs. C.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Frequent information of cytological/ HPV DNA screening results

Intervention Type OTHER

All participants will be referred to pertinent diagnosis and treatment according to local standard of care (Käypä hoito 2010) should the cytological screening results (HSIL, ASC-H, AGC-FN) or three consecutive LSIL findings at repeated control visits within 3 years indicate it. The most common screening results (ASCUS, LSIL) are, however, not convened to arm A2 participants before age 28.

All cytology and HPV DNA results results are being revealed to all trial participants at age 28 at the study end.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Frequent information of cytological/ HPV DNA screening results

All participants will be referred to pertinent diagnosis and treatment according to local standard of care (Käypä hoito 2010) should the cytological screening results (HSIL, ASC-H, AGC-FN) or three consecutive LSIL findings at repeated control visits within 3 years indicate it. The most common screening results (ASCUS, LSIL) are, however, not convened to arm A2 participants before age 28.

All cytology and HPV DNA results results are being revealed to all trial participants at age 28 at the study end.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Born 1995-1997. 25 years of age residence in one of the eight community-randomized trial A communities with documented herd effect from gender-neutral vaccination or C communities devoid of the herd effect.

Exclusion Criteria

* Immune compromising disease status (e.g. transplant recipients). HPV vaccination
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tampere University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Union

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tampere University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tiina Eriksson

Research coordinator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matti Lehtinen, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tampere University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HPV-tutkimukset

Hämeenlinna, , Finland

Site Status

HUS

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Iisalmi, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Joensuu, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema, PSHP/ Tampereen yliopisto

Kemi, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema, PSHP/Tampereen yliopisto

Kotka, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Kouvola, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema, PSHP; Tampereen yliopisto

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema, PSHP/ Tampereen yliopisto

Lahti, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Oulu, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Pori, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Porvoo, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema, PSHP; Tampereen yliopisto

Rauma, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Sastamala, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Nuorisotutkimusasema; PSHP/ Tamereen yliopisto

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

HPV-tutkimukset

Varkaus, , Finland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Finland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lehtinen M, Elfstrom M, Vanska S, Dillner J. Elimination of cervical cancer by refined vaccination and screening. Int J Cancer. 2025 Feb 15;156(4):886-888. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35228. Epub 2024 Oct 25. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39450703 (View on PubMed)

Lehtinen M, Bruni L, Elfstrom M, Gray P, Logel M, Mariz FC, Baussano I, Vanska S, Franco EL, Dillner J. Scientific approaches toward improving cervical cancer elimination strategies. Int J Cancer. 2024 May 1;154(9):1537-1548. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34839. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38196123 (View on PubMed)

Lehtinen M, Gray P, Louvanto K, Vanska S. In 30 years, gender-neutral vaccination eradicates oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types while screening eliminates HPV-associated cancers. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Jun;21(6):735-738. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2064279. Epub 2022 Apr 15. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35404177 (View on PubMed)

Gray P, Kann H, Pimenoff VN, Eriksson T, Luostarinen T, Vanska S, Surcel HM, Faust H, Dillner J, Lehtinen M. Human papillomavirus seroprevalence in pregnant women following gender-neutral and girls-only vaccination programs in Finland: A cross-sectional cohort analysis following a cluster randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 7;18(6):e1003588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003588. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34097688 (View on PubMed)

Vanska S, Luostarinen T, Baussano I, Apter D, Eriksson T, Natunen K, Nieminen P, Paavonen J, Pimenoff VN, Pukkala E, Soderlund-Strand A, Dubin G, Garnett G, Dillner J, Lehtinen M. Vaccination With Moderate Coverage Eradicates Oncogenic Human Papillomaviruses If a Gender-Neutral Strategy Is Applied. J Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 17;222(6):948-956. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa099.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32161969 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HPV400

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.