Arthroscopic Synovectomy of the Wrist in Inflammatory Arthritis

NCT ID: NCT04755127

Last Updated: 2023-12-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Psoriatic (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are inflammatory joint diseases that often involve the wrist and may result in progressive joint destruction followed by impaired wrist function and reduced quality of life. The first line treatment usually consists of conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) along with bridging therapy using systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids in case of limited joint disease. After initiation therapy, intra-articular corticosteroids are often utilized as they provide rapid dampening of joint inflammation in case of a flare-up of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis). However, a substantial part of these patients clinically respond poorly or not at all. Alternatively, arthroscopic synovectomy may provide substantial relieve of symptoms, improve functionality, slow down disease progression and prevent joint destruction, as earlier studies have suggested. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. Moreover, they may prevent the need for expensive biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) and assist in guiding therapeutic strategies in the long run, through collecting and analysing valuable synovial biopsies. Wrist arthroscopy is a routine procedure in the participating centres with only minor complications and fast recovery.

Objective: To compare arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (DIACS) versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids (IACSI) in RA and PsA patients with mono- or oligoarthritis of the wrist that is refractory to cDMARD therapy.

Study design: Multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in the Maasstad Hospital and Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum (SMC).

Study population: Patients with active RA or PsA and bDMARD-naive, who develop a localized flare of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis) that involves the wrist, defined as an increase in DAS28 \> 1.2 or \> 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to the last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before) and that is refractory to systemic cDMARD for at least three months, defined as no response on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria.

Intervention: This study will randomize between IACSI of the wrist (control) and arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist combined with DIACS (intervention). During arthroscopy synovial biopsies will be collected and stored for later analysis of the functional and histological characteristics of the synovium (beyond the scope of this study).

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score from randomization to three months of follow-up. The PRWE is a validated, fifteen-item self-reported questionnaire rating wrist pain and function. Secondary outcomes are resolution of wrist arthritis measured by ultrasound, standard wrist radiographs, DAS28, EULAR response rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), cost effectiveness analyses (CEA), physical examination, adverse events (AE) and laboratory results. Follow-up visits are scheduled at three, six and twelve months after intervention.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with study participation:

Both study arms include standard treatment of care. Wrist arthroscopy is a standard treatment for wrist arthritis and often implemented for other intra-articular wrist pathology. The risks include infection, neurovascular damage and articular surface damage. Nevertheless, wrist arthroscopy is a well-established and safe technique. Reduction of risks will be done according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. If complications arise, the treating physician will proportionate the adequate treatment according to the current protocols based on the published literature. Patients will be asked to return at three, six and twelve months. These visits are standard of care following the rheumatic arthritis protocol. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and at three follow-up moments. These will take 160 minutes in total. The arthroscopy group will return between ten to fourteen days for wound inspection. All patient will be contacted by telephone at two, four and six weeks for VAS pain scores.

Expected results: We expect that arthroscopic synovectomy followed by DIACS will lead to significantly more improvement in PRWE scores compared to IACSI three months after intervention. Furthermore, we anticipate that wrist arthroscopy will result in lower pain scores, better joint mobility, better response on EULAR score, sustained resolution of arthritis on ultrasound, less joint damage on radiographs and is more cost-effective after one-year analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wrist Arthritis Psoriatic Arthritis Rheumatoid Arthritis Surgery

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Wrist arthroscopy Arthroscopic synovectomy Rheumatoid arthritis Psoriatic Arthritis Patient related outcome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

non-blinded randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

Injection with 40mg triamcinolone acetonide (kenacort) in the wrist

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection with 40mg triamcinolone acetonide (kenacort) in the wrist

arthroscopic synovectomy

Wrist arthroscopy in day surgery setting with debulking of synovitis, inspection of cartilage, ligament, tendon and bone damage, collection of synovial biopsies and deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (40mg triamcinolone acetonide)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Wrist arthroscopy in day surgery setting with debulking of synovitis, inspection of cartilage, ligament, tendon and bone damage, collection of synovial biopsies and deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (40mg triamcinolone acetonide)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist

Wrist arthroscopy in day surgery setting with debulking of synovitis, inspection of cartilage, ligament, tendon and bone damage, collection of synovial biopsies and deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (40mg triamcinolone acetonide)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

Injection with 40mg triamcinolone acetonide (kenacort) in the wrist

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients with age ≥ 18 years
* Subjects able and willing to give written informed consent (or legally acceptable representative or impartial witness when applicable) and is available for entire study
* Patients meet the criteria of either group below:


* Patients that are diagnosed with RA according to the revised 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria (table 1)
* Patients are experiencing an exacerbation defined as an increase in DAS28 \> 1.2 or \> 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before)
* The exacerbation is refractory to systemic cDMARDs for at least three months, defined as 'no response' according to the EULAR response criteria (table 2)
* Wrist arthritis, that is diagnosed clinically, is the predominant symptom


* Patients that are diagnosed with PsA according to the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria (table 3)
* Patients are experiencing an exacerbation defined as an increase in DAS28 \> 1.2 or \> 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before)
* The exacerbation is refractory to systemic cDMARDs for at least three months, defined as 'no response' according to the EULAR response criteria (table 2)
* Wrist arthritis, that is diagnosed clinically, is the predominant symptom

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous or current treatment with biological (b) DMARDs
* Current inflammatory joint disease other than RA or PsA (e.g. gout, reactive arthritis, Lyme disease)
* Subjects who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study
* Intra-articular corticosteroids injection in the wrist in the last 6 months
* Previous wrist surgery
* Severe osteoarthritis with malformations of the wrist
* Congenital abnormalities of wrist function or motion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maasstad Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Radjesh Bisoendial, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maasstad ziekenhuis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maasstad Hospital

Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Philip d'Ailly, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 31102912205

Email: [email protected]

Christel Deugd-Verburg, MSc

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 31102912205

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Philip d'Ailly, MD

Role: primary

Radjesh Bisoendial, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ARCTIC01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id