Validation of the Two-minute Walk Test and the Ten-meter Walk Test in Individuals With Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04750148
Last Updated: 2023-01-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
56 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-15
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing Physical Fitness in Cancer Patients With Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Wearable Data Generation
NCT02786628
Adaptated Physical Activity During Chemotherapy: Evaluation of the Psychological, Physiological and Biological Impact
NCT02785341
Exercise Preconditioning in Ovarian Cancer
NCT05029154
Feasibility of an Evidence-based Walking Program in Cancer Pts 60+ During Chemotherapy
NCT01789983
The Effect of Walking on Fatigue After Chemotherapy in Patients 65 and Older
NCT02191982
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The 10-meter walk test (10MeWT) is frequently used in practice to assess patients' functional capacity. It would be another way to assess the walking ability with a short test.
However, the relationship between the 2MWT, 6MWT and 10MeWT in an oncological context remain unclear.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cancer
Individuals with an oncology disease will be included in the study.
6-minute walking test
The subject walks as far as possible for 6 minutes along a 30m long corridor.
2-minute walking test
The subject walks as far as possible for 2 minutes along a 30m long corridor.
10-meter walk test
The natural and fast walking speeds of the subject are measured over 10m. This speed is measured by the examiner as well as by the subject (self-tested version).
One leg stance test
The time held in unipodal equilibrium is measured by the examiner.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
6-minute walking test
The subject walks as far as possible for 6 minutes along a 30m long corridor.
2-minute walking test
The subject walks as far as possible for 2 minutes along a 30m long corridor.
10-meter walk test
The natural and fast walking speeds of the subject are measured over 10m. This speed is measured by the examiner as well as by the subject (self-tested version).
One leg stance test
The time held in unipodal equilibrium is measured by the examiner.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have medical authorization from the patient's oncologist authorizing gait tests
* Participate in the HUG rehabilitation program
* Be able to give consent by signature
* To be of legal age
* Do not present pain when walking more than 2/10
* Be able to walk with or without technical aids for a period of 6 minutes (as per patient's statement)
Exclusion Criteria
* Bone metastases at risk of fracture
* Osteoporosis at high risk of fracture
* Unbalanced Hypertension (hypertension)
* Not being able to carry out the walk tests in their entirety
* Not being able to perform the gait tests for reasons related to the side effects of the treatments (anemia, undernutrition, vomiting, severe fatigue, risk of thrombocytopenia, pain).
* Not being able to carry out the walking test because of a lack of understanding of the instructions or because of psychological problems.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aline Reinmann
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aline Reinmann
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aline Reinmann
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
School of Health Sciences Geneva
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geneva University Hospitals
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bohannon RW, Bubela D, Magasi S, McCreath H, Wang YC, Reuben D, Rymer WZ, Gershon R. Comparison of walking performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the Six-Minute Walk Test. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Apr 25;7:269. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-269.
Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 29;284(6329):1607-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6329.1607. No abstract available.
Chan WLS, Pin TW. Reliability, validity and minimal detectable change of 2-minute walk test, 6-minute walk test and 10-meter walk test in frail older adults with dementia. Exp Gerontol. 2019 Jan;115:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
Eden MM, Tompkins J, Verheijde JL. Reliability and a correlational analysis of the 6MWT, ten-meter walk test, thirty second sit to stand, and the linear analog scale of function in patients with head and neck cancer. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;34(3):202-211. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1390803. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Gijbels D, Eijnde BO, Feys P. Comparison of the 2- and 6-minute walk test in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011 Oct;17(10):1269-72. doi: 10.1177/1352458511408475. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;42(1):103-7. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.11.0171.
Leung AS, Chan KK, Sykes K, Chan KS. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a 2-min walk test to assess exercise capacity of COPD patients. Chest. 2006 Jul;130(1):119-25. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.1.119.
Reid L, Thomson P, Besemann M, Dudek N. Going places: Does the two-minute walk test predict the six-minute walk test in lower extremity amputees? J Rehabil Med. 2015 Mar;47(3):256-61. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1916.
Scalzitti DA, Harwood KJ, Maring JR, Leach SJ, Ruckert EA, Costello E. Validation of the 2-Minute Walk Test with the 6-Minute Walk Test and Other Functional Measures in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;20(4):158-163. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2017-046.
Schmidt K, Vogt L, Thiel C, Jager E, Banzer W. Validity of the six-minute walk test in cancer patients. Int J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;34(7):631-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323746. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020-00126
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.