Trial Outcomes & Findings for Sun Protection Factor (SPF) Determination of Two Sunscreen-Containing Lip Balms (NCT NCT04749459)

NCT ID: NCT04749459

Last Updated: 2022-03-16

Results Overview

Arithmetic mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hrs after exposure to UVR. SPFi = MEDp/MEDu. No inferential statistical analysis was performed for this outcome. The MED is defined as the lowest dose of UVR that produces the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UVR exposure. The UVR exposure should be increased in geometric progression with 25% dose increment in relation to the expected SPF values. All individual SPF values were converted arithmetically to calculate SPF of test material (or control standard).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

14 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 24 hours post UVR exposure

Results posted on

2022-03-16

Participant Flow

The study was conducted at single center in United States.

Total 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total,12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites);10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset due to invalid data.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Study Participants
Study participants were randomly assigned to receive a single topical application of 3 study treatments (ChapStick Moisturizer \[CSM\] Classic; CSM Strawberry Flavor; P2 Control Standard) or no treatment to 4 test sites on the back; 80 +/- 2 milligram (mg) product was applied to each 40 square centimeters \[cm\^2\] test site (2.00 +/- 0.05 mg/cm\^2). If there was space for only 3 test sites on the participant's back, only one of the two ChapStick products was evaluated. Test sites received a progressive sequence of timed ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposures and were evaluated for erythema immediately after irradiation and 16-24 hours (hrs) later. A total of 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total, 12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites); 10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset (invalid data: erythema in all sub-sites treated with the test product).
Overall Study
STARTED
14
Overall Study
CSM Classic
12
Overall Study
CSM Strawberry Flavor
10
Overall Study
P2 Control Standard
14
Overall Study
COMPLETED
14
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Study Participants
n=14 Participants
Study participants were randomly assigned to receive a single topical application of 3 study treatments (ChapStick Moisturizer \[CSM\] Classic; CSM Strawberry Flavor; P2 Control Standard) or no treatment to 4 test sites on the back; 80 +/- 2 milligram (mg) product was applied to each 40 square centimeters \[cm\^2\] test site (2.00 +/- 0.05 mg/cm\^2). If there was space for only 3 test sites on the participant's back, only one of the two ChapStick products was evaluated. Test sites received a progressive sequence of timed ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposures and were evaluated for erythema immediately after irradiation and 16-24 hours (hrs) later. A total of 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total, 12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites); 10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset (invalid data: erythema in all sub-sites treated with the test product).
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
n=14 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
n=14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=14 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post UVR exposure

Population: All randomized participants who received study treatments (test and control standard) and provided valid SPFi values.

Arithmetic mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hrs after exposure to UVR. SPFi = MEDp/MEDu. No inferential statistical analysis was performed for this outcome. The MED is defined as the lowest dose of UVR that produces the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UVR exposure. The UVR exposure should be increased in geometric progression with 25% dose increment in relation to the expected SPF values. All individual SPF values were converted arithmetically to calculate SPF of test material (or control standard).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CSM Classic
n=11 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Classic vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Classic)
n=11 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Classic vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
CSM Strawberry Flavor
n=10 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Strawberry Flavor vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Strawberry Flavor)
n=10 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Strawberry Flavor vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
Arithmetic Mean of Individual Sun Protection Factor (SPFi) Values
17.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 3.5
17.9 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.4
19.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.5
18.4 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.1

Adverse Events

CSM Classic

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Classic)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CSM Strawberry Flavor

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Strawberry Flavor)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

All Study Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER