Trial Outcomes & Findings for Sun Protection Factor (SPF) Determination of Two Sunscreen-Containing Lip Balms (NCT NCT04749459)
NCT ID: NCT04749459
Last Updated: 2022-03-16
Results Overview
Arithmetic mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hrs after exposure to UVR. SPFi = MEDp/MEDu. No inferential statistical analysis was performed for this outcome. The MED is defined as the lowest dose of UVR that produces the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UVR exposure. The UVR exposure should be increased in geometric progression with 25% dose increment in relation to the expected SPF values. All individual SPF values were converted arithmetically to calculate SPF of test material (or control standard).
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
Up to 24 hours post UVR exposure
2022-03-16
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at single center in United States.
Total 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total,12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites);10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset due to invalid data.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Study Participants
Study participants were randomly assigned to receive a single topical application of 3 study treatments (ChapStick Moisturizer \[CSM\] Classic; CSM Strawberry Flavor; P2 Control Standard) or no treatment to 4 test sites on the back; 80 +/- 2 milligram (mg) product was applied to each 40 square centimeters \[cm\^2\] test site (2.00 +/- 0.05 mg/cm\^2). If there was space for only 3 test sites on the participant's back, only one of the two ChapStick products was evaluated. Test sites received a progressive sequence of timed ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposures and were evaluated for erythema immediately after irradiation and 16-24 hours (hrs) later. A total of 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total, 12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites); 10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset (invalid data: erythema in all sub-sites treated with the test product).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
CSM Classic
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
CSM Strawberry Flavor
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
P2 Control Standard
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participants
n=14 Participants
Study participants were randomly assigned to receive a single topical application of 3 study treatments (ChapStick Moisturizer \[CSM\] Classic; CSM Strawberry Flavor; P2 Control Standard) or no treatment to 4 test sites on the back; 80 +/- 2 milligram (mg) product was applied to each 40 square centimeters \[cm\^2\] test site (2.00 +/- 0.05 mg/cm\^2). If there was space for only 3 test sites on the participant's back, only one of the two ChapStick products was evaluated. Test sites received a progressive sequence of timed ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposures and were evaluated for erythema immediately after irradiation and 16-24 hours (hrs) later. A total of 14 participants were enrolled; up to 4 test sites on the back of each participant were randomized to treatment (2 test products, P2 Control Standard and 1 untreated site used to calculate MEDu). In total, 12 participants were treated with CSM Classic (12 test sites); 10 participants were treated with CSM Strawberry (10 test sites); 14 participants received P2 Control Standard (14 test sites). One participant was excluded from the final CSM Classic vs P2 Control dataset (invalid data: erythema in all sub-sites treated with the test product).
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
11 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=14 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours post UVR exposurePopulation: All randomized participants who received study treatments (test and control standard) and provided valid SPFi values.
Arithmetic mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hrs after exposure to UVR. SPFi = MEDp/MEDu. No inferential statistical analysis was performed for this outcome. The MED is defined as the lowest dose of UVR that produces the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UVR exposure. The UVR exposure should be increased in geometric progression with 25% dose increment in relation to the expected SPF values. All individual SPF values were converted arithmetically to calculate SPF of test material (or control standard).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CSM Classic
n=11 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Classic vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
|
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Classic)
n=11 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Classic vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
|
CSM Strawberry Flavor
n=10 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Strawberry Flavor vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
|
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Strawberry Flavor)
n=10 Participants
All participants with evaluable data for CSM Strawberry Flavor vs P2 Control pairwise comparison.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Arithmetic Mean of Individual Sun Protection Factor (SPFi) Values
|
17.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
17.9 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
19.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
18.4 Ratio
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
Adverse Events
CSM Classic
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Classic)
CSM Strawberry Flavor
P2 Control Standard (vs. CSM Strawberry Flavor)
All Study Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER