Implementation, Efficacy and Costs of Inpatient Equivalent Home-Treatment in German Mental Health Care

NCT ID: NCT04745507

Last Updated: 2022-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

629 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The "inpatient-equivalent home treatment"(IEHT) according to §115d SGB-V is a particular version of the internationally well-known and evidence-based Home Treatment. As a complex intervention, IEHT requires a multi-method evaluation on different levels in the German context. The AKtiV study that is financed by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (proposal ID: VSF2\_2019-108) meets this request. In this quasi-experimental study with a propensity score-matched control group, we assess and combine quantitative and qualitative data. Outcome parameters include classical clinical ones such as hospital readmission rates, mental state, and recovery outcomes. In addition, it evaluates issues concerning the right target population, treatment processes, implementation strategies, and factors associated with positive outcomes. The study takes into account the perspective of patients, relatives, staff as well as decision makers in politics and administration. Therefore, we expect the results to be relevant for a broad audience and to contribute to further refinement and adaption of the model.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overarching goal of the AKtiV trial is to examine implementation processes, treatment processes, clinical efficacy, costs, and subjective experiences of IEHT following §115d of the German Social Code Book Five (SGB-V)compared to inpatient treatment from the perspective of service users, relatives or rather informal care givers' , staff and other stakeholders in mental health care. To maximize transferability of study results and to cover a broad spectrum of IEHT experience, 10 hospitals from different regions of Germany (e.g. rural, urban, east, west) participate in this study. Combining routine data, primary data and prospective follow-up data, the study results will be based/ involve a comprehensive database. Further, the combination of clinical and health economic data will enable the assessment of costs and benefits from a national perspective, a particularity of importance, given that there are only a few studies with health economic evidence of acute outreach mental health care. The qualitative evaluation of processes and out-comes of IEHT uses a collaborative-participatory approach that aligns with current demands for more user orientation and/ or involvement of people and researchers with lived experience in the process of developing interventions and their evaluation. The mixed-methods design of the trial corresponds with current standards of empirical social research enabling the triangulation of hypothesis-confirming, quantifiable factors and hypothesis-generating, qualitative aspects. By parallelizing on one hand quantitative and qualitative data and on the other hand routine data with primary data, data on implementation processes and data on treatment processes, different facets from different perspectives and levels of IEHT are targeted. This allows for a comprehensive, holistic assessment of this innovative treatment offer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Disorder Personality Disorders Schizo Affective Disorder Anxiety Disorders Eating Disorders Addiction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1 / C1

This cohort (C1) consists of 180 patients who receive IEHT in the recruiting sites, fulfil inclusion criteria and gave informed consent regarding their study participation.

Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

At-home psychiatric treatment by means of a multiprofessional clinic team (an equivalent to stationary psychiatric care).

Arm 2 / C2

This cohort (C2) consist of 180 patients receiving standard inpatient care (TAU) from the IEHT delivering hospital who fulfil inclusion criteria, are identified through a propensity score (PS) function as optimal control user or rather a "PS match" and gave informed consent regarding their study participation

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 3

360 close relatives or informal caregivers living in the same household of the participating patients who gave informed consent regarding their study participation. Thereby, one relative of each patients who is participating in the trial will be assessed (C1 = 180, C2 = 180).

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm 4:

Staff members of participating study cites as well as local and political stakeholders engaged with IEHT who gave informed consent (approximately n = 100 participants overall).

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment

At-home psychiatric treatment by means of a multiprofessional clinic team (an equivalent to stationary psychiatric care).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* acute mental health crisis that requires inpatient treatment;
* social and living surrounding allowing for home visits and private conversations;
* informed consent of all adults living in the service user's place of residency;
* ability to provide informed consent
* sufficient German language skills
* permanent residence in the catchment area of the IEHT delivering Hospital
* main diagnosis within the ICD codes F0X, F1X, F2X, F3X, F4X, F5X, or F6X


• informed consent regarding study participation

For C4: IEHT staff member of participating study cite OR local or political stakeholder engaged with IEHT


• informed consent regarding study participation

Exclusion Criteria

o in case of children living in the same household, presence of child welfare risk
* acute suicidality or aggressiveness towards others requiring hospital admission
* Being under order of commitment
* participation in an interventional study during the recruitment
* presence of substantial cognitive deficits as indicated by severe organic brain disease
* diagnosis of intellectual impairment
* admission longer ago than 7 days

For C3: Close relative or informal caregiver living in the same household of the participating patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Isar-Amper Klinikum München Ost

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie II der Universität Ulm

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kompetenzzentrum für Klinische Studien, Bremen

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vivantes Klinikum am Urban

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sebastian von Peter

Prof. Dr. med. Sebastian von Peter

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sebastian von Peter, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf

Andreas Bechdolf, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vivantes Klinikum am Urban

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zentrum für Psychiatrie Reichenau

Reichenau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

PP.rt, Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie Reutlingen mbH,

Reutlingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm (Weissenau),

Weißenau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

• Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie Zwiefalten

Zwiefalten, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum München-Ost

Haar, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Abteilung für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Psychiatrische Hochschulklinik

Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Klinikum am Urban; Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik

Kreuzberg, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

• Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Charité Mitte,

Mitte, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Vivantes Neukölln, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Roick C, Kilian R, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Mory C, Angermeyer MC. [German adaptation of the client sociodemographic and service receipt inventory - an instrument for the cost of mental health care]. Psychiatr Prax. 2001 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S84-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17790. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11605129 (View on PubMed)

Andreas S, Harfst T, Dirmaier J, Kawski S, Koch U, Schulz H. A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders. Psychopathology. 2007;40(2):116-25. doi: 10.1159/000098492. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17215598 (View on PubMed)

Cavelti M, Wirtz M, Corrigan P, Vauth R. Recovery assessment scale: Examining the factor structure of the German version (RAS-G) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;41:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Dec 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28049083 (View on PubMed)

Bernert S, Kilian R, Matschinger H, Mory C, Roick C, Angermeyer MC. [The assessment of burden on relatives of mentally ill people: the German version of the involvement evaluation questionnaire (IEQ-EU)]. Psychiatr Prax. 2001 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S97-101. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17792. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11605131 (View on PubMed)

Ludwig K, von der Schulenburg JG, Greiner W. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28219389 (View on PubMed)

Schaub D, Juckel G. [PSP Scale: German version of the Personal and Social Performance Scale: valid instrument for the assessment of psychosocial functioning in the treatment of schizophrenia]. Nervenarzt. 2011 Sep;82(9):1178-84. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3204-4. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21174069 (View on PubMed)

Bechdolf A, Nikolaidis K, von Peter S, Langle G, Brieger P, Timm J, Killian R, Fischer L, Raschmann S, Schwarz J, Holzke M, Rout S, Hirschmeier C, Hamann J, Herwig U, Richter J, Baumgardt J, Weinmann S. Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2445042. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39546314 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01VSF19048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Psychiatric Day Hospital Treatment
NCT00153959 COMPLETED NA