Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique

NCT ID: NCT04744012

Last Updated: 2022-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-11

Study Completion Date

2019-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to propose a modification of the original periostal pocket flap technique consisting in replacing the xenograft by a conglomerate which contains autologous bone obtained from the future implant site through biological drilling technique and PRGF (Plasma Rich in Growth Factors)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Materials and methods: 8 patients referred for implant placement and with a slight bucco-lingual (BL) width deficiency in alveolar bone were included in the study. Patients were placed dental implants and bone width was augmented by using the conglomerate mentioned above.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Regeneration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

unique group

After local anesthesia, a full thickness flap was elevated from the lingual wall and a partial thickness flap was performed in the buccal one. After that, the buccal periosteum was detached and dental implants were placed following the biological drilling protocol, getting autologous bone particles from the implant site.

Patient's blood collection was performed and the plasm obtained was poured down on a sterile container and mixed with autologous bone particles collected previously during the drilling procedure. Finally the graft was placed in the pocket prepared previously and the surgical wound was sutured in two planes.

Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After local anesthesia, a full thickness flap was elevated from the lingual wall and a partial thickness flap was performed in the buccal one. After that, the buccal periosteum was detached and dental implants were placed following the biological drilling protocol, getting autologous bone particles from the implant site.

Patient's blood collection was performed and the plasm obtained was poured down on a sterile container and mixed with autologous bone particles collected previously during the drilling procedure. Finally the graft was placed in the pocket prepared previously and the surgical wound was sutured in two planes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Modified Periostal Pocket Flap Technique

After local anesthesia, a full thickness flap was elevated from the lingual wall and a partial thickness flap was performed in the buccal one. After that, the buccal periosteum was detached and dental implants were placed following the biological drilling protocol, getting autologous bone particles from the implant site.

Patient's blood collection was performed and the plasm obtained was poured down on a sterile container and mixed with autologous bone particles collected previously during the drilling procedure. Finally the graft was placed in the pocket prepared previously and the surgical wound was sutured in two planes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a favorable bone density and favorable bone length but insufficient bone width that could compromise implant placement

Exclusion Criteria

* Smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day) and patients with severe systemic disease ( ASA III or IV - American Society of Anaesthesiology)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jesús Torres García Denche

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jesús Torres, Associate

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P-15/568

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.