Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Transgender Women in the US and South America (NCT NCT04742491)
NCT ID: NCT04742491
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Results Overview
Time to PrEP initiation is defined as the duration from enrollment to the PrEP start date.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
304 participants
0-18 months
2025-12-17
Participant Flow
All enrolled participants were randomized to study arms.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
149
|
155
|
|
Overall Study
Week 13 Follow-up
|
133
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
Week 26 Follow-up
|
125
|
136
|
|
Overall Study
Week 39 Follow-up
|
118
|
128
|
|
Overall Study
Week 52 Follow-up
|
116
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
Week 65 Follow-up
|
114
|
126
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
126
|
128
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
27
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Participant unwilling or unable to comply with required study procedures
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
One or more reactive HIV test results or acute HIV infection suspected
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant refused further participation
|
2
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Participant unable to adhere to visit schedule
|
3
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Other reasons
|
3
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Transgender Women in the US and South America
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
Total
n=304 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=6 Participants
|
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
25 and below
|
57 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
104 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
26 and above
|
92 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
200 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Missing
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Female
|
28 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Transgender Female/Transgender Woman
|
65 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
141 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Gender nonbinary/Genderfluid/Gender Nonconforming
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Another gender identity
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Prefer not to answer
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Gender · Multiple gender identities selected
|
49 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
149 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
304 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
82 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
62 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
46 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
96 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
53 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
45 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Limited to participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic
Time to PrEP initiation is defined as the duration from enrollment to the PrEP start date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=131 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=137 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Uptake
|
16.2 days
Standard Deviation 66.7
|
11.4 days
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed CASI at each study visit. Due to missingness, this number may be lower than the number of participants enrolled in the study.
Self-reported adherence to daily PrEP by study visit
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 7 doses per week
|
53 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 4-6 doses per week
|
17 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 7 doses per week
|
51 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · Missing
|
47 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 2-3 doses per week
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 4-6 doses per week
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 7 doses per week
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · Missing
|
118 Participants
|
125 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · < 2 doses per week
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 2-3 doses per week
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 4-6 doses per week
|
19 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 7 doses per week
|
79 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · Missing
|
30 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · < 2 doses per week
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 2-3 doses per week
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 4-6 doses per week
|
12 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 7 doses per week
|
76 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · Missing
|
22 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · < 2 doses per week
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 2-3 doses per week
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 4-6 doses per week
|
16 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 7 doses per week
|
61 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · Missing
|
30 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · < 2 doses per week
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 2-3 doses per week
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 4-6 doses per week
|
18 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · Missing
|
37 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · < 2 doses per week
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 2-3 doses per week
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 4-6 doses per week
|
16 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 7 doses per week
|
57 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · Missing
|
33 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · < 2 doses per week
|
3 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 2-3 doses per week
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · < 2 doses per week
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Enrolled participants. Deferred arm participants receive co-located services at 6 months.
Number of participants accepting co-located GAHT services at baseline and subsequent quarterly study visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Enrollment
|
68 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 13
|
106 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 26
|
109 Participants
|
66 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 39
|
113 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 52
|
114 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 65
|
115 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
Week 78
|
116 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 26, 52, 78Population: The denominators in the table differ from the overall number analyzed because the denominator excludes any participants who have terminated from the study or seroconverted at the time of the visit.
Participant retention at weeks 26, 52 and 78 by study arm. Retention defined as the number of participants who completed the visit divided by the number of participants who are expected or have completed the visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participant Retention at Weeks 26, 52 and 78
Week 26
|
125 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
|
Participant Retention at Weeks 26, 52 and 78
Week 52
|
115 Participants
|
123 Participants
|
|
Participant Retention at Weeks 26, 52 and 78
Week 78
|
126 Participants
|
128 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Enrolled population
The average number of peer health navigator encounters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
|
5.7 encounters
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
5.5 encounters
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Total number of peer health navigation encounters by arm.
Number of each type of peer health navigation encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=839 Encounters
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=737 Encounters
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
In-person
|
519 Encounters
|
427 Encounters
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
Email
|
0 Encounters
|
0 Encounters
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
Text
|
16 Encounters
|
7 Encounters
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
Phone
|
258 Encounters
|
256 Encounters
|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Peer Health Navigation
Video encounter
|
46 Encounters
|
47 Encounters
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Participants with a non-missing response to the CASI question concerning desire for co-located services at the end of the study.
Percentage of participants who report desire for co-located services at the end of the study
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=145 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability and Feasibility of Co-located Services
|
106 Participants
|
107 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Participants who initiated PrEP and had at least one permanent discontinuation prior to study exit or termination.
The average number of days to first PrEP permanent discontinuation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=28 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=18 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
|
364.1 days
Standard Deviation 185.2
|
361.1 days
Standard Deviation 255.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Participants who initiated PrEP and had at least one permanent discontinuation prior to study exit or termination.
The median number of days to first PrEP permanent discontinuation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=28 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=18 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
|
373 days
Interval 245.0 to 499.0
|
409 days
Interval 141.0 to 533.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: TFVDP levels of participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic.
Participants with different levels of TFV-DP concentrations in DBS measured at quarterly follow-up visits after PrEP initiation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=131 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=137 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
23 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · Unquantifiable
|
21 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · Unquantifiable
|
80 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · Less than 2 doses per week
|
10 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 2-3 doses per week
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 4-6 doses per week
|
5 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment · 7 doses per week
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · Unquantifiable
|
19 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 2-3 doses per week
|
6 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 4-6 doses per week
|
28 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13 · 7 doses per week
|
35 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
23 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 2-3 doses per week
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 4-6 doses per week
|
32 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26 · 7 doses per week
|
24 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · Unquantifiable
|
31 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
19 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 2-3 doses per week
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 4-6 doses per week
|
22 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39 · 7 doses per week
|
22 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · Unquantifiable
|
29 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
18 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 2-3 doses per week
|
14 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 4-6 doses per week
|
19 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52 · 7 doses per week
|
20 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · Unquantifiable
|
27 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · Less than 2 doses per week
|
19 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 2-3 doses per week
|
12 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 4-6 doses per week
|
17 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65 · 7 doses per week
|
23 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · Unquantifiable
|
39 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 2-3 doses per week
|
10 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 4-6 doses per week
|
16 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78 · 7 doses per week
|
23 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: FTC-TP levels of participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic.
Participants with different levels FTC-TP concentrations in DBS measured at quarterly follow-up visits after PrEP initiation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=131 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=137 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 65
|
55 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 78
|
51 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Enrollment
|
15 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 13
|
73 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 26
|
67 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 39
|
51 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
PrEP Adherence
Week 52
|
52 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Population: Participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic.
The proportion of TGW determined to be adherent at the Week 26 visit was compared by study arm. PrEP adherence was defined as having a detectable concentration of PrEP (Truvada or Descovy) in DBS sample.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=108 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=120 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Adherence
|
87 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic.
PrEP persistent is defined as the proportion of study visits where a participant demonstrates high adherence to PrEP among those who initiated PrEP at the study clinic. High adherence at a visit is based on drug concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS): Truvada (TDF/FTC): TFV-DP ≥ 900 fmol/punch Descovy (TAF/FTC): TFV-DP ≥ 950 fmol/punch PrEP persistent reflects sustained high PrEP adherence across multiple visits over time, rather than high PrEP adherence at a single point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=131 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=137 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Persistent
|
41.7 percent of visits
Standard Deviation 40.9
|
50.5 percent of visits
Standard Deviation 43.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 26Comparison of PrEP uptake between study arms at the end of Week 26. PrEP uptake is defined as whether the participant initiated PrEP at the study clinic..
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PrEP Uptake
|
127 Participants
|
135 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: The numbers presented in "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" represent the total number of participants enrolled in the study. For each visit (row), only participants who completed the CASI questionnaire were included in the analysis. For both questions "condom use with HIV+ people" and "condom use with HIV unknown people" analyses were restricted to participants who completed the CASI questionnaire at that visit.
Describing condom use with HIV+ people, measured by assessments at enrollment and quarterly through Week 78.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
68 Participants
|
75 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · None of the time
|
6 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Less than half the time
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · All of the time
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
65 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · None of the time
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Less than half the time
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · About half the time
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · More than half the time
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · All of the time
|
9 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · No sex
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Oral sex only
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
62 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · None of the time
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Less than half the time
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Missing
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · No sex
|
23 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
70 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · None of the time
|
4 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Less than half the time
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · About half the time
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · More than half the time
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · All of the time
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · More than half the time
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · All of the time
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · More than half the time
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · More than half the time
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · All of the time
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
81 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · None of the time
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Less than half the time
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · About half the time
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · More than half the time
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Oral sex only
|
17 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
69 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · None of the time
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Less than half the time
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · About half the time
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · More than half the time
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · All of the time
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · No sex
|
13 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Oral sex only
|
13 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · No sex
|
9 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · I did not have sex with anyone whom I knew was HIV+
|
101 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · None of the time
|
11 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Less than half the time
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · All of the time
|
6 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · No sex
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: The numbers presented in "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" represent the total number of participants enrolled in the study. For each visit (row), only participants who completed the CASI questionnaire were included in the analysis. For both questions "condom use with HIV+ people" and "condom use with HIV unknown people" analyses were restricted to participants who completed the CASI questionnaire at that visit.
Describing condom use with HIV unknown people, measured by assessments at enrollment and quarterly through Week 78.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · No sex
|
9 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
30 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · None of the time
|
20 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Less than half the time
|
20 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · About half the time
|
13 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · More than half of the time
|
18 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · All of the time
|
27 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · No sex
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
34 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · None of the time
|
24 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Less than half the time
|
9 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · About half the time
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · More than half of the time
|
16 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · All of the time
|
19 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Oral sex only
|
17 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
28 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · None of the time
|
14 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Less than half the time
|
11 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · About half the time
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · More than half of the time
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · All of the time
|
16 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · No sex
|
13 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Oral sex only
|
13 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
37 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · None of the time
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · About half the time
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · More than half of the time
|
9 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · All of the time
|
13 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Less than half the time
|
10 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
40 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · None of the time
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Less than half the time
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · About half the time
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · More than half of the time
|
13 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · All of the time
|
14 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · No sex
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Oral sex only
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
42 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · None of the time
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Less than half the time
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · More than half of the time
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · All of the time
|
10 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Missing
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · No sex
|
23 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · No sex with anyone whose HIV status was unknown
|
44 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · None of the time
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Less than half the time
|
11 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · More than half of the time
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · All of the time
|
10 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed CASI questionnaire per visit.
Frequency of being high on drugs/drunk during sex, measured by assessments at enrollment and quarterly through Week 78.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Less than half the time
|
34 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · About half the time
|
6 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · More than half of the time
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · All of the time
|
7 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Prefer not to answer
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · No sex
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · None of the time
|
72 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Less than half the time
|
19 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · About half the time
|
9 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · More than half of the time
|
4 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · All of the time
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Prefer not to answer
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Oral sex only
|
17 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · None of the time
|
57 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Less than half the time
|
21 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · No sex
|
9 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Oral sex only
|
10 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · None of the time
|
68 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · About half the time
|
2 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · More than half of the time
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · All of the time
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Prefer not to answer
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · No sex
|
13 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Oral sex only
|
13 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · None of the time
|
51 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Less than half the time
|
18 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · About half the time
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · More than half of the time
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · All of the time
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · No sex
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · None of the time
|
54 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Less than half the time
|
21 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · About half the time
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · More than half of the time
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · All of the time
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Missing
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · No sex
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Oral sex only
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · None of the time
|
58 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Less than half the time
|
15 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · About half the time
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · More than half of the time
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · All of the time
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Prefer not to answer
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Missing
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · No sex
|
23 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Oral sex only
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · None of the time
|
57 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Less than half the time
|
18 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · About half the time
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · More than half of the time
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · All of the time
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Prefer not to answer
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed CASI questionnaire per visit.
Had sex for money/drugs/housing/food/other things, measured by assessments at enrollment and quarterly through Week 78.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Missing
|
147 Participants
|
153 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · No
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Yes
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Enrollment · Prefer not to answer
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · No
|
90 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Yes
|
40 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 13 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · No
|
85 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Yes
|
36 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 26 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · No
|
83 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Yes
|
29 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 39 · Prefer not to answer
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Missing
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · No
|
75 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Yes
|
37 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 52 · Prefer not to answer
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · No
|
77 Participants
|
99 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Yes
|
29 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 65 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · No
|
90 Participants
|
107 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Yes
|
32 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Examining Changes in Sexual Risk-taking Behavior
Week 78 · Prefer not to answer
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 monthsPopulation: Enrolled participants
To determine baseline prevalence of STIs (Neisseria gonorrhoeae \[GC\], Chlamydia trachomatis \[CT\], and Treponema pallidum (syphilis)) by study arm
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Prevalence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis) at Baseline
Gonorrhea
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Prevalence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis) at Baseline
Chlamydia Trachomatis
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Prevalence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis) at Baseline
Syphilis (Positive/Reactive)
|
38 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 monthsPopulation: Enrolled participants. There is insufficient data (below the lower limit of quantification) to perform valid logistic regression modelling on participants with Hepatitis B or renal insufficiency at baseline.
To obtain baseline laboratory data to evaluate the cohort's suitability for future PrEP intervention studies (e.g., prevalence of renal insufficiency, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, etc.). Logistic regression models will be used for estimating prevalence of baseline conditions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Estimate Prevalence of Baseline Laboratory Values.
Hepatitis C Infection
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Estimate Prevalence of Baseline Laboratory Values.
Renal Insufficiency
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Estimate Prevalence of Baseline Laboratory Values.
Hepatitis B Infection
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed the CASI form at each study visit.
Taken hormones for gender identity/transition
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment
|
96 Participants
|
101 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13
|
91 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26
|
93 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39
|
85 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52
|
86 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65
|
82 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78
|
93 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed the CASI form at each study visit.
Currently taking hormones for gender identity/transition
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment
|
83 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13
|
88 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26
|
89 Participants
|
91 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39
|
84 Participants
|
90 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52
|
85 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65
|
79 Participants
|
88 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78
|
90 Participants
|
91 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who reported they were currently taking hormones.
Where do you currently get your hormones?
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment · Only from medical providers
|
47 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
14 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
16 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment · Some other source
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13 · Only from medical providers
|
70 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
11 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13 · Some other source
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26 · Only from medical providers
|
68 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
13 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26 · Some other source
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39 · Only from medical providers
|
65 Participants
|
78 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39 · Some other source
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52 · Only from medical providers
|
69 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52 · Some other source
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65 · Only from medical providers
|
59 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
17 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65 · Some other source
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78 · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78 · Only from medical providers
|
68 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78 · Medical providers and from friends, online, or other sources
|
17 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78 · Only from friends, online, or other non-licensed sources
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78 · Some other source
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed the CASI form at each study visit.
Ever had a substance (like silicone or other fillers) injected to fill out face or make figure look more womanly
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment
|
27 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed the CASI form at each study visit.
Ever had breast augmentation/surgery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment
|
36 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Number of participants who completed the CASI form at each study visit.
Ever had vaginoplasty/labiaplasty/SRS/GRS/GCS
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Enrollment
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 13
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 26
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 39
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 52
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 65
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy by Visit
Week 78
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Enrolled participants
The number of incident HIV infections at each time point by arm. Note: The HIV infection reported at Week 26 occurred during an interim visit between Week 26 and Week 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Enrollment
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 13
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 26
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 39
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 52
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 65
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Annual Incidence of HIV Infections
Week 78
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Enrolled participants
To determine annual incidence of STIs (Neisseria gonorrhoeae \[GC\], Chlamydia trachomatis \[CT\], and Treponema pallidum (syphilis)) and to examine changes in STI over time by study arm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Number of STI infections (first incidence)
|
51 participants
|
51 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 13
|
8 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 26
|
17 participants
|
10 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 39
|
4 participants
|
8 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 52
|
7 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 65
|
7 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Incidence of STI Infection (GC, CT, Syphilis)
Week 78
|
8 participants
|
5 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPrEP uptake is defined as whether the participant initiated PrEP at the study clinic during the study cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Identify Demographic, Behavioral, Socioeconomic, and Psychosocial Factors Related to PrEP Uptake
|
131 Participants
|
137 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: A total of 268 participants initiated PrEP at the study clinic. High PrEP adherence was assessed across 1,533 study visits.
The number of study visits at which participants were highly adherent to PrEP, among those who initiated PrEP at the study clinic. High adherence at a given visit is determined using drug concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS): Truvada: TFV-DP ≥ 900 fmol/punch Descovy: TFV-DP ≥ 950 fmol/punch Arm-level results are presented as the total number of visits at which participants in each arm were highly adherent to PrEP, reported as the number and percentage of visits.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=732 Visits
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=801 Visits
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Identify Demographic, Behavioral, Socioeconomic, and Psychosocial Factors Associated With PrEP Adherence Across Study Visits.
|
291 Visits
|
377 Visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: Participants who obtained PrEP at the study clinic.
PrEP persistence is defined as the proportion of study visits at which a participant demonstrates high adherence to PrEP among participants who initiated PrEP at the study clinic. High adherence at a given visit is determined using drug concentrations in dried blood spots (DBS): Truvada: TFV-DP ≥ 900 fmol/punch Descovy: TFV-DP ≥ 950 fmol/punch PrEP persistence reflects sustained high adherence across multiple visits over time per participant, rather than overall high adherence at all time points. For each participant, this proportion was converted to a percentage; arm-level results are presented as the mean of participant-level percentages in each arm in the outcome measure data table.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=131 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=137 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Identify Demographic, Behavioral, Socioeconomic, and Psychosocial Factors Related to PrEP Persistence
|
41.7 Percentage of Visits
Standard Error 40.9
|
50.5 Percentage of Visits
Standard Error 43.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-18 monthsPopulation: All enrolled participants.
An overall composite flag (Yes/No) for interest in future HIV research was created at the end of study using participant responses collected at enrollment, weeks 26, 52, and 78. Those who showed interest in future HIV research (Yes) were reported in the outcome measure data table.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 Participants
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm
n=155 Participants
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit.
GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Identify Demographic, Behavioral, Socioeconomic, and Psychosocial Factors Related to Interest in Future HIV Research
|
149 Participants
|
153 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Immediate Intervention Arm
Deferred Intervention Arm (0-6 Months)
Deferred Intervention Arm (6-18 Months)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 participants at risk
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm (0-6 Months)
n=155 participants at risk
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit. GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm (6-18 Months)
n=155 participants at risk
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit. GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute abdomen
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatotoxicity
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nosocomial infection
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Guillain-Barre syndrome
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Acute psychosis
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mental disorder
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Substance-induced psychotic disorder
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Immediate Intervention Arm
n=149 participants at risk
PrEP, GAHT and peer-health management was provided from enrollment to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm (0-6 Months)
n=155 participants at risk
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit. GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
Deferred Intervention Arm (6-18 Months)
n=155 participants at risk
PrEP was provided from enrollment to study exit. GAHT and peer-health management were offered from month 6 (week 26) to study exit.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
1.3%
2/155 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
3.4%
5/149 • Number of events 5 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
1.9%
3/155 • Number of events 3 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
3.2%
5/155 • Number of events 5 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
1.3%
2/155 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
|
8.7%
13/149 • Number of events 14 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
3.2%
5/155 • Number of events 5 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
8.4%
13/155 • Number of events 15 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 3 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/149 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.65%
1/155 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
1.3%
2/149 • Number of events 2 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pruritus genital
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.67%
1/149 • Number of events 1 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
0.00%
0/155 • From enrollment until end of follow-up (0-18 months)
Adverse events were reported by intervention. Immediate Arm participants received PrEP, GAHT, and peer-health management from enrollment to study exit. Deferred Arm participants received PrEP throughout, but GAHT and peer-health management only from month 6 onward. Therefore, adverse events for the Deferred Arm were split into 0-6 and 6-18 month periods, using the same denominator for both.
|
Additional Information
HPTN Statistical Manager
HPTN Statistical & Data Management Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place