Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Alignment Achieved Using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Versus Manual Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty (NCT NCT04730271)

NCT ID: NCT04730271

Last Updated: 2025-04-27

Results Overview

The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate whether the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution is non-inferior to the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with the manual ATTUNE Intuition instrumentation. This will be assessed by measuring the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) on long-leg X-rays taken at 12 weeks and comparing to the planned HKA. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 weeks

Results posted on

2025-04-27

Participant Flow

A total of 200 subjects were recruited into the study and received the intended treatment. An additional 34 subjects were recruited during the study but did not receive the planned treatment and were withdrawn and replaced in the study as allowed in the protocol.

Of the 34 subjects withdrawn without receiving the planned treatment, 8 were withdrawn due to a significant delay in having their procedure performed, 7 were withdrawn due to not meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 6 were withdrawn due to the surgeon using an out of scope implant, 4 withdrew due to their insurance not covering surgery, 5 withdrew their consent, 3 were withdrawn due to the specified instrumentation not being available and one was withdrawn due to a change in the surgeon.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Study Arm
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
Manual Instrumentation
Overall Study
STARTED
100
100
Overall Study
Intent to Treat and Completed 12 Week Follow up Per Protocol
90
92
Overall Study
COMPLETED
88
81
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
12
19

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Study Arm
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
Manual Instrumentation
Overall Study
Adverse Event
0
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
1
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
7
13
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3
3
Overall Study
Death
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Comparison of Alignment Achieved Using the VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution Versus Manual Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Study Arm
n=100 Knees
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=100 Knees
Manual Instrumentation
Total
n=200 Knees
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
66.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28 • n=5 Participants
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05 • n=7 Participants
65.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
92 Participants
n=7 Participants
189 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
68 Participants
n=7 Participants
149 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: Intent to Treat

The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate whether the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with VELYS Robotic-Assisted Solution is non-inferior to the accuracy to plan of the long leg alignment achieved with the manual ATTUNE Intuition instrumentation. This will be assessed by measuring the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) on long-leg X-rays taken at 12 weeks and comparing to the planned HKA. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=90 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=92 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Accuracy of the Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA) Measured on Long-leg X-rays at 12 Weeks.
2.2 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.77
2.5 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.76

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: Per Protocol

The accuracy of the distal femoral varus-valgus angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on an X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=74 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=85 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Accuracy of the Distal Femoral Varus-valgus Angle Measured on Long Leg X-rays at 12 Weeks.
1.4 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.16
2.0 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: Per Protocol

The accuracy of the proximal tibial varus-valgus angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on an X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=80 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=91 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Accuracy of the Proximal Tibial Varus-valgus Angle Measured on Long-leg X-rays at 12 Weeks
1.2 Degrees
Standard Deviation 0.95
1.6 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: Per Protocol

The accuracy of the femoral component flexion angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on a lateral X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=80 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=91 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Accuracy of Femoral Component Flexion Angle Measured on Lateral X-rays at 12 Weeks
1.9 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.42
2.8 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.89

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks

Population: Per Protocol

The accuracy of the Tibial slope angle was assessed by comparing the angle measured on a lateral X-ray 12 weeks post operatively to the angle that the surgeon was targeting or planning intra operatively. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=80 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=91 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Accuracy of the Tibial Slope Angle Measured on Lateral X-rays at 12 Weeks
1.6 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.25
2.7 Degrees
Standard Deviation 2.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Safety Analysis Set

Rate of local Adverse events and local serious adverse events reported within the first 90 days and the first year post surgery. Local means at the site of the procedure (i.e. the operated Knee). Serious adverse events are events that required medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious impairment to health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=100 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=100 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Type and Frequency of Adverse Events
Number of subjects who experienced a Local Adverse Events with 1 year of the procedure.
25 Number of subjects
29 Number of subjects
Type and Frequency of Adverse Events
Number of subjects who experienced a Serious Local Adverse Events within 1 year of the procedure
6 Number of subjects
16 Number of subjects
Type and Frequency of Adverse Events
Number of subjects who experienced a Local Adverse Events within 90 days of the procedure
21 Number of subjects
27 Number of subjects
Type and Frequency of Adverse Events
Number of subjects who experienced a Serious Local Adverse Events within 90 days of the procedure
5 Number of subjects
12 Number of subjects

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of operation (intraoperative)

Population: Safety Set

Investigators conducted an intra-operative assessment of the condition and function of key soft tissue structures in both Manual and Robotic-assisted cohorts.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=100 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=100 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of medial collateral ligament being compromised intraoperatively.
0 participants
2 participants
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of lateral collateral ligament being compromised intraoperatively.
0 participants
0 participants
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of posterior cruciate ligament being compromised intraoperatively
0 participants
1 participants
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of posterior lateral capsule being compromised intraoperatively.
0 participants
0 participants
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of posterior medial capsule being compromised intraoperatively.
0 participants
0 participants
Soft Tissue Damage
Incidence of patella tendon being compromised intraoperatively.
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. Scores are derived by a 5 digit code. The higher the number, the better the overall health status of the patient with 1 (meaning full health) and 0 (meaning a state as bad as being dead).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline Pre op to 1 year
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.159
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.195
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline Pre op to 12 weeks
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.170
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.186

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks and 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

The Forgotten Joint Scores comprise measures for the assessment of joint-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO). These PRO questionnaires focus on patients' awareness of a specific joint in everyday life. Joint awareness can be simply defined as any unintended perception of a joint. This may include strong sensations like pain, but also includes more subtle feelings like mild stiffness, subjective dysfunction, or any discomfort. The FJS-12 score ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst score and 100 being the best. A higher score means the patient is better able to forget about the artificial joint in daily life. So, the higher the score, the better the outcome is.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)
FJS at 12 Weeks
35.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.73
26.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.39
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)
FJS at 1 year
53.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.72
45.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.59

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

A knee-specific instrument that derives a score developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The maximum total score is 100 indicating no symptoms and the minimum is 0 indicating extreme symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ADL - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 1 year
35.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.93
31.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.21
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ADL - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
25.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.03
24.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.07

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

A knee-specific instrument that derives a score developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The maximum total score is 100 indicating no symptoms and the minimum is 0 indicating extreme symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 1 year
37.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.68
35.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.21
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
24.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.91
25.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.14

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

A knee-specific instrument that derives a score developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The maximum total score is 100 indicating no symptoms and the minimum is 0 indicating extreme symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 1 year
31.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.13
28.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.02
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Symptoms - Change From Baseline
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
20.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.92
21.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.62

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

A knee-specific instrument that derives a score developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The maximum total score is 100 indicating no symptoms and the minimum is 0 indicating extreme symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sports and Recreation - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at 1 year
39.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.12
38.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.09
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sports and Recreation - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at 12 weeks
23.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 40.87
23.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.71

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

A knee-specific instrument that derives a score developed to assess the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems. The maximum total score is 100 indicating no symptoms and the minimum is 0 indicating extreme symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at 1 year
45.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.67
42.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.42
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life - Change From Baseline
Change from Baseline at 12 weeks
33.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.35
32.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.28

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data during the PROM collection.

A single patient reported question that asks the patient to score their level of satisfaction with their knee from 0-10, with 0 being fully satisfied and 10 being fully unsatisfied

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Subject Satisfaction With Knee Replacement
Satisfaction at 12 weeks
1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.03
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
Subject Satisfaction With Knee Replacement
Satisfaction at 1 year
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 weeks, 1 year

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. The number analyzed at each time point and for each metrics varies due to patients either being lost to follow up between visits or there being missing data.

Subjects are asked how much knee pain they have had in the last week while resting (0-10) and during activity (0-10) with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain, therefore lower score is a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=86 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=94 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain at Rest Change from baseline at 1 year
-4.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
-4.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain at Rest change from baseline at 12 weeks
-3.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
-2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain at rest at 12 weeks
2.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.38
3.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain at rest at 1 year
1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14
2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain with activity change from baseline at 1 year
-5.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.78
-5.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.71
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain with activity change from baseline at 12 weeks
-4.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.75
-4.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.00
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain with activity at 12 weeks
2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.43
3.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
Pain - Change From Baseline
Pain with activity at 1 year
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
2.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.58

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

The effect of learning curve on the accuracy was assessed by comparing the accuracy between the first 10 cases each surgeon completed and the subsequent cases. The accuracy was assessed by measuring the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA) on long-leg X-rays taken at 12 weeks and comparing to the planned HKA. A smaller number represents improved accuracy and a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Study Arm
n=41 Participants
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=44 Participants
Manual Instrumentation
Learning Curve
2.2 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.66
2.4 Degrees
Standard Deviation 1.90

Adverse Events

Study Arm

Serious events: 16 serious events
Other events: 32 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Control Arm

Serious events: 28 serious events
Other events: 35 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Study Arm
n=100 participants at risk
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=100 participants at risk
Manual Instrumentation
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthrofibrosis
6.0%
6/100 • Number of events 7 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
8.0%
8/100 • Number of events 9 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 4 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Post Procedural Infection
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 3 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Device Related Infection
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Bursitis Infective
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy disruption
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon Disorder
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
4.0%
4/100 • Number of events 4 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
6.0%
6/100 • Number of events 7 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rotator Cuff Syndrome
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon Rupture
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrileneutropenia
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Systemic Mycosis
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus Injury
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Vulval Cancer
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Kidney Injury
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonaryembolism
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Injury
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Study Arm
n=100 participants at risk
Robotic-Assisted
Control Arm
n=100 participants at risk
Manual Instrumentation
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
General disorders
Pain
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
General disorders
Peripheral Swelling
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
General disorders
Swelling
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
3.0%
3/100 • Number of events 3 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Infections and infestations
Arthritis Infection
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Use Error
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision Site Pain
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural Pain
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
9.0%
9/100 • Number of events 10 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
6.0%
6/100 • Number of events 6 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthrofibrosis
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Pain
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Effusion
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Noise
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Range of Motion Decreased
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Stiffness
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
5.0%
5/100 • Number of events 5 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
3.0%
3/100 • Number of events 3 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Product Issues
Device Loosening
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Necrosis
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Injury
0.00%
0/100 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • From baseline (Day 0 - including the procedure) up to the end of the study (1 year)
The safety population set consisted of all enrolled participants who signed the informed consent document and attempted treatment according to the actual treatment received.

Additional Information

Ian Leslie

DePuy Synthes

Phone: N/A

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60