Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pawsitive Impacts of Therapy Dog Visits (NCT NCT04727749)

NCT ID: NCT04727749

Last Updated: 2021-11-05

Results Overview

Participants Stratified by Pain scores Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes, Pain Scores at 20 Minutes Post Visit.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

211 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

20 minutes post visit

Results posted on

2021-11-05

Participant Flow

Recruitment took place at the Emergency Department of the Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon, SK, between June and September of 2019.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Overall Study
STARTED
107
104
Overall Study
COMPLETED
97
101
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
10
3

Baseline Characteristics

Pawsitive Impacts of Therapy Dog Visits

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=107 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=104 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Total
n=211 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
60 years
n=5 Participants
63 years
n=7 Participants
62 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
57 Participants
n=7 Participants
117 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · Aboriginal Peoples of North America
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · Black
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · Filipino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · South Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · White
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
81 Participants
n=7 Participants
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnic Origin · White, Aboriginal Peoples of North America
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
109 participants
n=5 Participants
102 participants
n=7 Participants
211 participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
0
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
1
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
2
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
3
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
4
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
5
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
6
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
7
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
8
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
9
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Pain Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
10
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
0
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
79 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
1
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
2
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
3
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
4
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
5
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
6
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
7
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
8
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
9
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Anxiety Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
10
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
0
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
1
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
2
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
3
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
4
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
5
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
6
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
7
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
8
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
9
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Depression Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
10
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
0
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
1
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
2
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
3
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
4
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
5
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
6
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
7
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
8
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
9
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Well-being Score (ESAS-r) A higher number represents a worse outcome
10
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Blood Pressure
Systolic
126 mm HG
n=5 Participants
129 mm HG
n=7 Participants
127 mm HG
n=5 Participants
Blood Pressure
Diastolic
74 mm HG
n=5 Participants
73 mm HG
n=7 Participants
73 mm HG
n=5 Participants
Heart Rate
77 bpm
n=5 Participants
77 bpm
n=7 Participants
77 bpm
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post visit

Participants Stratified by Pain scores Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes, Pain Scores at 20 Minutes Post Visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
0
50 Participants
43 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
1
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
2
3 Participants
13 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
3
5 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
4
7 Participants
11 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
5
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
6
4 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
7
9 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
8
4 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
9
0 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Pain Scores
10
1 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline visit compared to 20 minutes post-visit

Pain score using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Pain Score
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.05
0.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.30

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post-visit

Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes, Anxiety Scores at 20 Minutes Post Visit

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
0
55 Participants
45 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
1
3 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
2
6 Participants
13 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
3
11 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
4
4 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
5
8 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
6
1 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
7
5 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
8
3 Participants
4 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
9
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Anxiety Scores
10
1 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post-visit

Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes, Depression Scores at 20 Minutes Post Visit

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
10
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
0
51 Participants
55 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
1
5 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
2
5 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
3
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
4
7 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
5
4 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
6
6 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
7
0 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
8
4 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Depression Scores
9
0 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post-visit

Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes, Well-being Scores at 20 Minutes Post Visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
0
14 Participants
15 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
1
5 Participants
6 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
2
8 Participants
8 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
3
12 Participants
12 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
4
12 Participants
11 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
5
26 Participants
26 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
6
6 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
7
7 Participants
7 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
8
5 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
9
2 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants Stratified by Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (Revised Version) (ESAS-r) Well-Being Scores
10
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post-visit

Mean arterial blood pressure using a blood pressure cuff

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Blood Pressure
1.01 mm HG
Standard Deviation 10.7
-.04 mm HG
Standard Deviation 8.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 20 minutes post-visit

Radial pulse

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Heart Rate
.48 BPM
Standard Deviation 11.68
-.4 BPM
Standard Deviation 8.02

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: Baseline visit compared to 20 minutes post-visit

Anxiety score is measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Anxiety Score
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
-0.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: Baseline visit compared to 20 minutes post-visit

Depression score using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Depression Score
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.77

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: Baseline visit compared to 20 minutes post-visit

Well-Being score using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (revised version) (ESAS-r) 11-point rating scale (scale of 0 to 10), in which higher ratings indicate worse outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=97 Participants
Patient interacts with the therapy dog and handler. Therapy Dog Team Visit: For the intervention group, patient interacts with the therapy dog, handler shares information about the therapy dog, asks about patient's pets, and offers a trading card of the therapy dog at the conclusion of the visit.
No Therapy Dog Team Visit
n=101 Participants
No patient interaction with the therapy dog or handler.
Change in Well-Being Score
-0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84
0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.84

Adverse Events

Therapy Dog Team Visit

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

No Therapy Dog Team Visit

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Colleen Dell

University of Saskatchewan

Phone: 306-966-5912

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place