AssessMent and Counseling to Get the Best Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Assistive TeCHnology
NCT ID: NCT04723784
Last Updated: 2023-12-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-15
2023-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The protocol presents a project that aims to improve the independence, participation and functional mobility of people with disabilities.
The sample is formed by people with disabilities that will participate from the first stage of the process, with an initial assessment of their abilities and needs, a complete implication during the test of technology, and in the final application of outcome measures instruments.
Only with this perspective and active participation of the users is possible to carry on a user-centered approach. That fact will allow to define and to generate technological solutions that really adjust to the expectations, needs and priorities of the people with disabilities, avoiding that the AT be abandoned, with the consequent health and social spending.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main result of the AIR4DP project consists of the implementation of assistive technology that allows to incorporate the latest advances in Artificial Intelligence to improve life quality of people with disabilities. With this target, the investigators present a coordinated project that is divided into three sub-projects, whose main goals consist of developing and evaluating the breakthrough of the proposed technology in people with functional diversity.
In this Study Protocol, the justification and the development of subproject MATCH are explained. It will be coordinated by the University of A Coruña, and its performance implies the participation of people with disabilities.
Therefore, this project is focused on the implementation of outcome measurement tools to improve the efficacy, effectiveness and real utility of the assistive technology devices (ATD) developed. On the other hand, it is also very important to assess the functional impact the ATD has on the user's participation in their social environment. For that, other measurement tools to assess functional mobility outcomes will also be also carried out during basal assessment and after 6 months of ATD implementation.
For this study protocol, the hypothesis is related to the relevance of the assessment of the interaction between the users and the AT: in order to guarantee a high match person-AT, to also get a positive psychosocial impact in the life of people with disabilities, the assessment and monitoring result two fundamental aspects.
According to this hypothesis, the research groups has fixed two main objectives for the MATCH subproject:
* To determine the psychosocial impact of AT created during the coordinated project (AIR4ALL) on the life of people with disabilities.
* To promote the best match between the user and the assistive technology used.
To complete, few secondary goals have been proposed:
* To assess the functional skills and abilities of people with disabilities, and to identify their needs to get independence in mobility and activities of daily living.
* To design and create the best technology solutions individualized for each person, meeting with the design for all principles, and promoting the involvement of the final user.
* To validate the assistive technology's solutions designed and prototyped in order to increase the levels of participation in daily activities to people with disabilities.
* To validate a protocol/model of outcome measures in the field of assistive technology to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of selecting and prescribing these products.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Person with disability
* Initial assessment.
* Implementation of AT in the daily life of participants
* Application of outcome measures and analysis of the data
Initial Assessment
In this phase the evaluation of the participants will be done, with the application of the instrument presented in outcome measures' section. According to the age of the person, specific questionnaires will be used to gather information more concrete about the skills for mobility. This assessment will allow determining the specific needs, demands and capabilities of participants. The assessment process will be done by professionals of research groups in rooms of collaborators centers.
Implementation of assistive technology in the daily life of participants
The professionals of collaborator centers, supported by the research groups, will carry on the training in the use of AT by the participants, facilitating its incorporation during the performance of activities of daily living.
Application of outcome measures
After the process of implementation of AT (the next 2 and 6 months), members of the research group and the professionals of collaborators centers will apply the measurement instruments to determine the possible improvements in the level of functional independence (FIM scale) of people with disabilities, the impact that the AT has had on their lifes (PIADS scale) and the level of matching between person and AT (ATD PA - MPT model).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Initial Assessment
In this phase the evaluation of the participants will be done, with the application of the instrument presented in outcome measures' section. According to the age of the person, specific questionnaires will be used to gather information more concrete about the skills for mobility. This assessment will allow determining the specific needs, demands and capabilities of participants. The assessment process will be done by professionals of research groups in rooms of collaborators centers.
Implementation of assistive technology in the daily life of participants
The professionals of collaborator centers, supported by the research groups, will carry on the training in the use of AT by the participants, facilitating its incorporation during the performance of activities of daily living.
Application of outcome measures
After the process of implementation of AT (the next 2 and 6 months), members of the research group and the professionals of collaborators centers will apply the measurement instruments to determine the possible improvements in the level of functional independence (FIM scale) of people with disabilities, the impact that the AT has had on their lifes (PIADS scale) and the level of matching between person and AT (ATD PA - MPT model).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 2 and 21 years old.
* To form part of any of the collaborators' centers with the three universities.
* To have an independent functional level moderate - low (assessed by the Functional Independence Measure.
* To have functional skills - mobility domain level moderate - low (assessed by the Spanish version of Pediatric of Disability Inventory - PEDI)
Exclusion Criteria
* To have cognitive skills very limited, that limits to follow the instructions to good use of AT.
* Not to have adequate human supports to make use of AT.
* To have functional skills - mobility domain level low (assessed by the Spanish version of Pediatric of Disability Inventory - PEDI), with the need for maximum assistance from caregivers.
24 Months
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alcala
OTHER
University of Seville
OTHER
Universidade da Coruña
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thais Pousada
PhD Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Salvador Naya Fernández, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Universidade da Coruña
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Health Sciences. University of A Coruña
A Coruña, Galicia, Spain
University of Alcalá de Henares
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Faculty of Health Science
A Coruña, , Spain
University of Sevilla
Seville, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Groba B, Pousada T, Nieto L. Assistive technologies, tools and resources for the access and use of information and communication technologies by people with disabilities. Handbook of Research on Personal Autonomy Technologies and Disability Informatics. 2010.
VVAA. Proyecto EASTIN. Red europea de información sobre las tecnologías para la discapacidad y la autonomía. Minusval. 2005;153:17-34.
Laloma M. Ayudas técnicas y discapacidad. Madrid: Comité Español de Representantes de Personas con Discapacidad; 2005.
Vidal García Alonso J, Prat Pastor J, Rodríguez-Porreor Miret C, Sández Lacuesta J, Vera Luna P. Libro Blanco I+D+I al servicio de las Personas con Discapacidad y las Personas Mayores. Vol. 1. Madrid: Ministerio de trabajo y asuntos sociales, Ministerio de Ciencia y tecnología; 2003.
Scherer. Assistive technology matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington DC: American psychological Association; 2001.
Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Jan;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/17483100600845414.
Pousada Garcia T, Groba Gonzalez B, Nieto Rivero L, Pereira Loureiro J, Diez Villoria E, Pazos Sierra A. Exploring the Psychosocial Impact of Wheelchair and Contextual Factors on Quality of Life of People with Neuromuscular Disorders. Assist Technol. 2015 Winter;27(4):246-56. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2015.1045996.
DeRuyter. The importance of outcome measures for assistive tehcnology service delivery systems. Technol Disabil. 1997;6:89-104.
World Health Organization. Global priority research agenda for improving access to high-quality affordable assistive technology The Initiative [Internet]. Geneva; 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 18]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254660/1/WHO-EMP-IAU-2017.02-eng.pdf?ua=1
Fuhrer MJ, Jutai JW, Scherer MJ, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Nov 18;25(22):1243-51. doi: 10.1080/09638280310001596207.
Smith RO, Rust KL, Jansen C, & Seitz J. ATOMS Project technical report - The ICF in the context of assistive technology (AT) interventions and outcomes [Internet]. Vol. 2010. 2006. Available from: http://www.r2d2.uwm.edu/atoms/archive/icf.html.
Jimenez Arberas E. "Impacto psicosocial de los productos y tecnologías de apoyo para la comunicación en personas con discapacidad auditiva y personas sordas [Internet]. University of Salamanca; 2016. Available from: http://sid.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO27380/JimenezArberas.pdf
Pousada Garcia T. Impacto psicosocial de la silla de ruedas en la vida de las personas con enfermerades neuromusculares. [A Coruña]: Universidade da Coruña; 2011.
Groba B, Pousada T, Nieto L. Assistive technologies, tools and resources for the access and use of information and communication technologies by people with disabilities. Assistive Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. 2013.
Pousada T, Groba B, Nieto-Riveiro L, Pazos A, Diez E, Pereira J. Determining the burden of the family caregivers of people with neuromuscular diseases who use a wheelchair. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(24):e11039. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011039.
Pousada T, Pereira-Loureiro J, Díez E, Groba B, Nieto-Riveiro L, Pazos A. Needs, demands and reality of people with neuromuscular disorders users of wheelchair. Examines Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2017 Nov 13 [cited 2019 Jul 15];1(1). Available from: https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/20294
Enright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003 Aug;48(8):783-5.
Mylius CF, Paap D, Takken T. Reference value for the 6-minute walk test in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016 Dec;10(12):1335-1352. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2016.1258305. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):24-30. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d.
Garcia C. Adaptación transcultural y validación de la versión en español de la Pediatric Balance Scale. Universidad de Extremadura; 2017.
Uniform Data System for Medical. Functional Independence Measure, version 5.1. New York: Buffalo General Hospital; 1997.
Martinez-Martin P, Fernandez-Mayoralas G, Frades-Payo B, Rojo-Perez F, Petidier R, Rodriguez-Rodriguez V, Forjaz MJ, Prieto-Flores ME, de Pedro Cuesta J. [Validation of the functional independence scale]. Gac Sanit. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.06.007. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Spanish.
Pousada Garcia T, Groba Gonzalez B, Nieto-Riveiro L, Canosa Dominguez N, Maldonado-Bascon S, Lopez-Sastre RJ, Pacheco DaCosta S, Gonzalez-Gomez I, Molina-Cantero AJ, Pereira Loureiro J. Assessment and counseling to get the best efficiency and effectiveness of the assistive technology (MATCH): Study protocol. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 16;17(3):e0265466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265466. eCollection 2022.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/597
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id