Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dupilumab-PEdiatric Skin Barrier Function and LIpidomics STudy in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis (NCT NCT04718870)
NCT ID: NCT04718870
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Results Overview
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize skin barrier function (SBF). TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Lesional skin (LS) areas for TEWL assessment and STS was identified at Baseline ('predefined skin area'). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on the first spot. Percent Change from Baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this outcome measure (OM).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
41 participants
Baseline, Week 16
2025-09-15
Participant Flow
Study was conducted at 3 active sites in the United States and United Kingdom. A total of 43 participants were screened between 19 Feb 2021 and 12 May 2022, out of which 41 were enrolled and 2 were screen failures due to not meeting inclusion criteria.
Healthy volunteer's cohort received no treatment and was considered as a reference comparator group.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy volunteers with age, gender, location of targeted skin lesion area and study site matched to selected atopic dermatitis (AD) participants, received no treatment, but were monitored in a similar way as AD participants.
|
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight more than or equal to (\>=) 15 kilograms (kg) and less than (\<) 30 kg received a subcutaneous (SC) loading dose of dupilumab 600 milligrams (mg) (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection every 4 weeks (Q4W), from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection every 2 weeks (Q2W), from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Dupilumab-PEdiatric Skin Barrier Function and LIpidomics STudy in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Healthy Volunteers
n=18 Participants
Healthy volunteers with age, gender, location of targeted skin lesion area and study site matched to selected AD participants, received no treatment, but were monitored in a similar way as AD participants.
|
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=23 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
Total
n=41 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.8 • n=5 Participants
|
7.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=7 Participants
|
8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Healthy Volunteer arm as pre-specified in protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize skin barrier function (SBF). TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Lesional skin (LS) areas for TEWL assessment and STS was identified at Baseline ('predefined skin area'). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on the first spot. Percent Change from Baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this outcome measure (OM).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=18 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) After 5 Skin Tape Stripping (STS) on Lesional Skin (LS) in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-38.5633 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.1211
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at Baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-33.1336 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.1613
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that was used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from Baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-35.6671 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.2267
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from Baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin (Non-LS) in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-6.1452 percent change
Standard Deviation 67.9496
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on the first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-13.6682 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 33.3065
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participant arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
13.2578 percent change
Standard Deviation 64.3880
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participant arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 20 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
5.9327 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 32.0123
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS and non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=18 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-33.3119 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.7125
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at Baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=18 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-33.4028 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.1957
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-7.6067 percent change
Standard Deviation 54.7945
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-12.6576 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 30.0412
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participants arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
4.5364 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.7525
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participant arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 15 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 15 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
0.1082 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 17.5865
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-34.7741 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.0541
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-33.1024 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 36.2286
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-3.8193 percent change
Standard Deviation 74.6263
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-10.9488 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.1300
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participant arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
0.7091 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.0615
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis participant arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 10 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 10 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
-1.3482 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 6.6778
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week16
|
-4.8842 percent change
Standard Deviation 70.5670
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for healthy volunteer arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=17 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Week 16
|
-9.0771 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.3022
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
1.4464 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.7257
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for atopic dermatitis arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of the skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. The normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1) and Week 16 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at Week 16 in TEWL after 5 STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=11 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Week 16
|
-1.0255 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.3657
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. LS areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline ('predefined skin area'). Within predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Percent change from Baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on LS (at each spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=23 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
-7.1596 percent change
Standard Deviation 36.6637
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
-6.3439 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.8145
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
-7.0747 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.3554
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
-8.1780 percent change
Standard Deviation 44.9382
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-30.3070 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.6643
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
-29.1730 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.7167
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-37.8349 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.7709
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
-33.0139 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.8560
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
-36.1625 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.9829
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
-32.9996 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.2028
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
-38.2449 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.0558
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
-39.3104 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.6888
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
-35.8992 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.9526
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
-45.6060 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.2839
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
-41.1371 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.5842
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
-36.0863 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.7259
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
-37.4815 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.8507
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
-32.3491 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.2966
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
-40.9536 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.9966
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
-20.8463 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.6518
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
-31.3185 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.0614
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
-35.2305 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.8818
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
-37.8675 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.0275
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
-15.3096 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.6163
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
-11.0740 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.5483
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
-27.0015 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.8528
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
-32.7080 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.8445
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
-40.8609 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.8002
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
-30.3358 percent change
Standard Deviation 48.3028
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
-36.5267 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.7230
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. LS areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on LS (at each spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=23 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
-9.3486 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.2256
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
-15.4336 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 25.0975
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
-9.8073 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 19.7385
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
-7.6682 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.9239
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-23.0157 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 26.8847
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
-20.7186 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 23.4149
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
-21.2010 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.2593
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
-17.9170 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 19.7310
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
-27.0535 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 28.0249
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
-24.5188 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 25.6684
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
-3.1965 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.4640
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
-15.6557 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 20.1212
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-23.9585 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.7106
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
-20.7018 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 22.5936
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
-25.1221 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 27.0210
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
-24.2358 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 24.6028
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
-6.0491 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 17.5810
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
-27.4493 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 33.7080
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
-22.5607 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.7696
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
-22.0860 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 27.1286
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
-20.3379 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 20.3751
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
-29.1917 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 24.3114
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
-24.4494 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 24.2054
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
-23.1056 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 20.4692
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
-24.6678 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 27.8013
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
-23.2878 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 26.5670
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
-17.9028 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 22.2483
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
-28.2564 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 29.2212
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
-18.7786 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.4917
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
-19.8921 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 27.8520
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on non-LS (at each spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=23 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
41.0825 percent change
Standard Deviation 91.3744
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
13.5236 percent change
Standard Deviation 49.3733
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
9.7943 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.9272
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
19.0612 percent change
Standard Deviation 58.1703
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
9.6866 percent change
Standard Deviation 52.6831
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
13.2574 percent change
Standard Deviation 55.8095
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-3.9277 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.9880
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
8.9306 percent change
Standard Deviation 70.2617
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
0.4973 percent change
Standard Deviation 49.5636
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-8.9585 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.0443
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
-10.5728 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.2672
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
-13.0407 percent change
Standard Deviation 44.5264
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
-15.6919 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.7995
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
-21.6885 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.1255
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
-16.2025 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.7984
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
-24.5008 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.9801
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
-27.6040 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.0969
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
-25.7321 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.1310
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
-21.9316 percent change
Standard Deviation 34.3620
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
-16.7008 percent change
Standard Deviation 62.4384
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
-29.2721 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.0673
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
-20.4359 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.6948
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
-23.1303 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.2717
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
-27.4981 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.5326
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
-6.7535 percent change
Standard Deviation 73.4261
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
-16.3903 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.9864
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
-19.3970 percent change
Standard Deviation 46.5302
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
-23.3812 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.5978
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
-27.3104 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.8267
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
-22.1813 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.5124
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on non-LS (at each spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=23 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
4.1752 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.1047
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
-2.6176 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 13.1001
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
-6.7411 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 13.5999
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
-9.7772 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.7879
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
-8.2272 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.6158
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
-8.0665 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.9970
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
-8.9200 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.3266
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
-10.4414 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.5146
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
-5.3314 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 12.8392
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-5.3400 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 10.8674
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
-9.5905 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.0754
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
-6.7424 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 9.7834
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
-8.8444 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 12.4876
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
-0.0248 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.8585
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
-0.3413 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 9.8571
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
0.4723 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 9.7975
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
-1.0171 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 11.3877
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-3.8162 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 10.3046
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
-3.5735 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 16.4593
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
-10.5600 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.1984
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
-8.2874 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 8.5546
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
-11.9179 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 13.1662
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
-7.6171 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 16.1511
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
-13.1811 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 14.4647
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
-9.2906 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 13.7202
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
-11.2776 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 12.9322
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
-7.0229 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 15.4066
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
-7.0408 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 12.8562
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
-11.2953 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 15.3452
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
-11.1625 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 16.2087
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Percent change from Baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on normal skin (at each spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
5.0103 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.4170
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
9.9969 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.4219
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
8.4098 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.2499
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
2.9668 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.1272
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
3.3636 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.9400
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
-8.7688 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.5764
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
-3.8203 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.5160
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
1.9837 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.7012
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
-4.0758 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.1886
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
-1.7489 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.1652
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-2.6655 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.8558
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
7.5939 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.7859
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
3.8603 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.1068
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-1.7648 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.4820
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
1.4115 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.8012
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
13.4093 percent change
Standard Deviation 35.9985
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
7.6533 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.0747
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
5.3384 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.9065
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
12.6926 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.7125
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
5.2021 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.1397
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
0.7096 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.5448
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
5.1021 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.0690
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
2.6054 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.2241
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
9.4234 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.1533
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
17.0905 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.4596
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
10.3105 percent change
Standard Deviation 52.8138
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
11.2398 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.7028
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
11.5842 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.2298
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
5.3772 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.9583
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
12.0900 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.8690
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. At each visit, before STS, all three spots were assessed. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL before STS on normal skin (at each spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 2
|
-1.8215 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.3907
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 3
|
-0.3829 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.3925
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 1
|
-0.7575 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.2991
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 2
|
1.0233 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.7207
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 1
|
-1.1631 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.1429
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 2
|
0.8585 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 1.8609
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 29 - Spot 3
|
0.7938 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 1.7624
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 1
|
-1.0129 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.0940
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 2
|
-0.8357 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.7103
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 2
|
0.2283 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 2.6839
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 1
|
-0.3791 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.4231
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 2
|
0.4882 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 2.5528
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 113 - Spot 3
|
2.0527 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 2.1762
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 1
|
-0.9293 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 6.5972
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 2
|
0.6880 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.7653
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 155 - Spot 3
|
0.4793 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.5057
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 1
|
-0.6153 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.8187
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 2
|
-0.0427 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.6560
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 1
|
-0.5786 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.3947
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 15 - Spot 2
|
-1.0029 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.4320
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 22 - Spot 3
|
0.6433 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 2.0759
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 43 - Spot 3
|
0.7057 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 5.1247
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 1
|
0.6308 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.1304
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 1
|
-0.2508 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.8798
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 8 - Spot 3
|
-0.7869 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 2.9791
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 57 - Spot 3
|
1.5142 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.1943
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 1
|
0.0164 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.2348
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 2
|
-0.3221 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.5460
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 85 - Spot 3
|
0.2779 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.8491
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL Before STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 8, 15, 22, 29, 43, 57, 85, 113, 155 and 197
Day 197 - Spot 3
|
0.6747 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.8536
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over defined number of STS was used to reflect the overall integrity of the stratum corneum. LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within the predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC was a composite measure before and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
-38.2091 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.6654
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
-34.0025 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.1866
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Area Under the Curve (AUC) of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-40.0143 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.9737
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over defined number of STS (nsts) used to reflect the overall integrity of stratum corneum. LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC was a composite measure before and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in AD participants reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
-632.0224 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 494.4981
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
-608.1875 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 601.7999
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-659.4033 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 570.2425
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over defined number of STS reflect the overall integrity of the stratum corneum. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment \& STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL measured prior to STS \& after 5, 10, 15 \& 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC was a composite measure before \& after 5, 10, 15 \&20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 \& 197 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
-21.7570 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.1137
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
-10.8940 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.7679
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-28.6897 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.0253
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: a noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over defined number of STS used to reflect the overall integrity of stratum corneum. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline(predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10,15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC was a composite measure before and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline(Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in AD participants reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
-281.9579 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 342.1271
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
-217.7544 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 462.0173
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-367.5469 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 340.1948
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over a defined number of STS used to reflect the overall integrity of the stratum corneum. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment \& STS were identified at baseline(predefined skin area). Within predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL measured prior to STS \& after 5, 10,15 \& 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC: composite measure before \& after 5, 10, 15\& 20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 \& 197 conducted on first spot. Percent Change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in healthy volunteers reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
3.2794 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.6493
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
3.4753 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.2504
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-10.1582 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.4753
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. TEWL AUC done over defined number of STS used to reflect the overall integrity of stratum corneum. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS identified at baseline(predefined skin area). Within predefined Normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL measured prior to STS and after 5, 10,15 and 20 STS on pre-defined Normal skin areas at specified time points. TEWL AUC was a composite measure before and after 5, 10,15 and 20 STS at each specified time point. AUC of TEWL: calculated for each visit using trapezoidal method. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Days 57, 113 and 197 conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL AUC (first spot) in healthy volunteers reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 57
|
16.8563 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 70.4582
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 113
|
2.5568 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 197.8379
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in AUC of TEWL on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
Day 197
|
-72.9050 nsts*grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 108.8230
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL: measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113 and 197 were conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on LS (first spot) in AD participant were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
-42.2019 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.5314
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
-38.5633 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.1211
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-36.4601 percent change
Standard Deviation 47.5902
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
-40.4595 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.4572
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
-34.7741 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.0541
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-39.9440 percent change
Standard Deviation 29.2084
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
-41.6561 percent change
Standard Deviation 24.0960
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
-33.3119 percent change
Standard Deviation 32.7125
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-38.4286 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.0978
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
-34.8297 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.0520
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
-33.1336 percent change
Standard Deviation 28.1613
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-35.6561 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.0987
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, the uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL: measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
-31.3795 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 25.4943
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
-31.1761 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.3420
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-33.5753 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 40.1857
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
-36.4267 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.1758
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
-33.1024 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 36.2286
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-35.8254 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 33.3362
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
-37.9779 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 23.3049
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
-33.4028 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.1957
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-36.0843 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 27.5612
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
-35.0726 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 23.5765
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
-35.6671 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.2267
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-34.5257 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 23.9001
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL: measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113and 197 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
-24.8218 percent change
Standard Deviation 31.4633
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
-4.8842 percent change
Standard Deviation 70.5670
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-29.7635 percent change
Standard Deviation 44.0691
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
-20.3640 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.5318
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
-3.8193 percent change
Standard Deviation 74.6263
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-29.6888 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.9536
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
-18.4348 percent change
Standard Deviation 33.3647
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
-7.6067 percent change
Standard Deviation 54.7945
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-27.2268 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.1580
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
-19.2584 percent change
Standard Deviation 30.1343
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
-6.1452 percent change
Standard Deviation 67.9496
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-22.3311 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.0908
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'healthy volunteer' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Non-LS areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined non-LS areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL: measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined non-LS areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on the first spot. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on non-LS (first spot) in AD participants were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=19 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
-11.8526 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 12.6180
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
-9.0771 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 21.3022
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-15.8375 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 18.0369
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
-15.0005 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 20.1721
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
-10.9488 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 31.1300
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-21.2825 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 23.2998
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
-16.1047 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 26.4807
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
-12.6576 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 30.0412
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-21.9006 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 19.2885
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
-18.5800 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 30.3574
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
-13.6682 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 33.3065
|
|
Secondary: Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Non-lesional Skin in AD Participants at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-20.0575 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 16.1537
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113 and 197 was conducted on first spot. Percent change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
4.9595 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.0950
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
1.4464 percent change
Standard Deviation 26.7257
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-1.6729 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.2293
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
4.0996 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.4647
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
0.7091 percent change
Standard Deviation 25.0615
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-7.4475 percent change
Standard Deviation 19.7215
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
3.2339 percent change
Standard Deviation 20.9086
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
4.5364 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.7525
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-14.0103 percent change
Standard Deviation 18.5552
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
4.3494 percent change
Standard Deviation 27.5527
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
13.2578 percent change
Standard Deviation 64.3880
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-18.0480 percent change
Standard Deviation 22.6193
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 57, 113 and 197Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants with available data for this OM and 'number analyzed' = participants with available data for each specified category. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for 'atopic dermatitis participant' arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
TEWL assessment: noninvasive in vivo measurement of water loss across stratum corneum that is used to characterize SBF. TEWL combined with STS measures SBF. With STS, uppermost layers of skin are peeled away using adhesive discs. Normal skin areas for TEWL assessment and STS were identified at baseline (predefined skin area). Within predefined normal skin areas, 3 closely adjacent non-overlapping spots were identified for subsequent SBF assessment. TEWL was measured prior to STS and after 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on pre-defined normal skin areas at specified time points. STS assessment at baseline (Week 0, Day 1), Day 57, 113 and 197 were conducted on first spot. Absolute change from baseline at specified time points in TEWL after STS on normal skin (first spot) in healthy volunteers were reported in this OM.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atopic Dermatitis Participants
n=15 Participants
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 57
|
0.5642 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 3.3355
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 113
|
-1.0255 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.3657
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 57
|
3.4683 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 9.8235
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 5 STS: Day 197
|
-1.5627 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 5.2934
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 57
|
0.2825 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 4.5142
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 113
|
-1.3482 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 6.6778
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 10 STS: Day 197
|
-3.0880 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 5.2754
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 57
|
0.4750 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 6.4442
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 113
|
0.1082 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 17.5865
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 15 STS: Day 197
|
-5.8847 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 8.1968
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 113
|
5.9327 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 32.0123
|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in TEWL After 5, 10, 15 and 20 STS on Normal Skin in Healthy Volunteers at Days 57, 113 and 197
After 20 STS: Day 197
|
-7.4760 grams per square meter per hour
Standard Deviation 9.3514
|
Adverse Events
Healthy Volunteers
Atopic Dermatitis Participant
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Healthy Volunteers
n=18 participants at risk
Healthy volunteers with age, gender, location of targeted skin lesion area and study site matched to selected AD participants, received no treatment, but were monitored in a similar way as AD participants.
|
Atopic Dermatitis Participant
n=23 participants at risk
Pediatric participants with moderate-to-severe AD and with baseline body weight \>=15 kg and \<30 kg received a SC loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 300 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0) followed by dupilumab 300 mg SC injection Q4W, from Week 4 to Week 12. Pediatric participants with body weight \>=30 kg and \<60 kg received SC loading dose of dupilumab 400 mg (2 injections of dupilumab 200 mg) on Day 1 (Week 0), followed by dupilumab 200 mg SC injection Q2W, from Week 2 to Week 14.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dermatitis Infected
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Molluscum Contagiosum
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis Media Chronic
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin Bacterial Infection
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
0.00%
0/23 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Suspected Covid-19
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
17.4%
4/23 • Number of events 5 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
0.00%
0/23 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food Allergy
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
0.00%
0/23 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 4 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Irritation
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pain
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular Hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 2 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis Atopic
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
39.1%
9/23 • Number of events 10 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash Erythematous
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain In Extremity
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
General disorders
Medical Device Site Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
26.1%
6/23 • Number of events 7 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
0.00%
0/23 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod Sting
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon Injury
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.00%
0/18 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • For AD participants: from first dose (i.e., Day 1) of IMP administration up to end of treatment visit (i.e., Day 113). For healthy volunteers: from signature of consent form to end of study (i.e., up to Day 197)
Analysis was performed on safety population that included all participants, who actually received at least 1 dose of IMP or had at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment and all healthy volunteers who have at least 1 TEWL/STS assessment performed.
|
Additional Information
Trial Transparency Team
Sanofi aventis recherche & développement
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER