Trial Outcomes & Findings for Precision Gait Retraining for Children With Cerebral Palsy (NCT NCT04717323)
NCT ID: NCT04717323
Last Updated: 2022-03-04
Results Overview
Measures the accuracy of identifying heel strike and toe off timing in % error when comparing measures from wearable sensors vs. motion capture
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
1 day
2022-03-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
0
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Precision Gait Retraining for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
Total
n=10 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
—
|
27.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=7 Participants
|
27.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
—
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
—
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
—
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
—
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was conducted for control participants that completed the study procedure.
Measures the accuracy of identifying heel strike and toe off timing in % error when comparing measures from wearable sensors vs. motion capture
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gait Metric Accuracy
|
—
|
2.01 percentage of error
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was conducted for control participants that completed the study procedure
Difference (in degrees) between pelvis range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pelvis Range of Motion During Walking
|
—
|
1.40 degrees
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was not conducted since patient participants in need of EMG biofeedback were not recruited.
Measures electromyographic (EMG) signals of trunk and lower limb muscles during gait which are necessary for designing and implementing a mobile pelvic assist device (mPAD) system with biofeedback
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was not conducted since patient participants assigned to the pelvic assistance intervention were not recruited.
Structured interviews will be used to grade the perception of difficulty in using the technology
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was conducted for control participants that completed the study procedure
Difference (in degrees) between trunk range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Trunk Range of Motion During Walking
|
—
|
1.34 degrees
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was conducted for control participants that completed the study procedure
Difference (in degrees) between hip range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hip Range of Motion During Walking
|
—
|
2.09 degrees
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 dayPopulation: Analysis was conducted for control participants that completed the study procedure
Difference (in degrees) between knee range of motion during walking as detected by wearable sensors and motion capture
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Patients
Gait with and without pelvic assistance
|
Controls
n=10 Participants
Gait with no pelvic assistance
|
|---|---|---|
|
Knee Range of Motion During Walking
|
—
|
3.12 degrees
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
Adverse Events
Pelvic Assist (Patients)
No Intervention (Controls)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place