Prospective Study: The Effect on Clinical Outcome After Treatment of MTP Cartilage Lesions in Hallux Valgus Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04716140
Last Updated: 2025-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
99 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-15
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Weight Bearing on Patient Outcomes Following 1st MTP Joint Fusion
NCT04473196
Transarticular Lateral Release Versus Percutaneous Lateral Release for Hallux Valgus
NCT04614675
Patient Reported Function Following Combined First MTP and First TMT Arthrodesis.
NCT05527197
Short Term Follow-up of Patient Implanted With the Metatarso-Phalangeal Prosthesis METIS®
NCT01284985
Prospective, Multi-Center Clinical Evaluation of the Open Wedge Osteotomy and Low Profile Plate & Screw (LPS) System Compared to the Proximal Chevron Osteotomy for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus With an Increased Intermetatarsal Angle
NCT01791634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Group 1: 50 patients in whom no treatment of the cartilage lesions is performed: these patients have no cartilage lesion or a grade I cartilage lesion at the MTP I joint that has been found to be operative. The grade of the cartilage lesions will be determined on the basis of the ICRS scale and an MS Hololens.
Group 2: 50 patients with a cartilage lesion\> grade 1 found during surgery. Whether or not to treat the cartilage injury will be randomly determined. 50 envelopes will be made with 25 treat, 25 not to treat. Just before surgery, Dr. T. Lootens an envelope will be drawn which will determine the further policy of the operation:
Group 2A: 25 patients who are not treated for the cartilage injury. Group 2B: 25 patients who are treated for the cartilage injury by means of debridement of the lesion and microfracture.
The patients who will undergo surgery for hallux valgus will be seen pre-operatively at the outpatient clinic by the investigators. During this consultation, an explanation will be given about the research and the participant will have to sign an informed consent before participating in the study. Here, the participant will also receive an envelope with questionnaires (AOFAS score / SF 36 score / VAS pain and satisfaction), which they will fill out on the day of surgery.
Follow up The participants will be seen again at the orthopedics outpatient clinic for clinical follow-up and filling out questionnaires at 10 days, 5 weeks, 4 months and 1 year postoperatively. This follow up will be done by the co-investigator, who is blinded during the study.
Scientific foundation Corrective hallux valgus surgery currently exists in two ways: open and closed (percutaneous) technique. To date, there is no consensus on the treatment of visible cartilage lesions at the MTP I joint during the open technique. It is not known whether or not treating these injuries has an impact on the patient's clinical outcome. The Principle investigator already treats the serious cartilage lesions (\> GR1 lesions) by means of debridement of the lesion, followed by microfracture. As there is no literature available on this topic yet, this research could certainly add value for the therapeutic approach of cartilage lesions at MTP I in the future.
Moreover, if microfracture gives a significantly better clinical outcome, this means that the closed (percutaneous) technique is contraindicated as a corrective technique in patients with hallux valgus. If this is not the case, no cartilage lesions at the level of the MTP I joint need to be taken into account during open technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MTP1 joint with no cartillage laesion or grade I
Patients in whom no treatment of the cartilage lesions is performed: these patients have no cartilage lesion or a grade I cartilage lesion at the MTP I joint that has been found peroperatively. The degree of the cartilage lesions will be determined on the basis of the ICRS scale and an MS Hololens.
No interventions assigned to this group
MTP1 joint with cartillage laesion > grade I - non treatment
Patients in whom a cartilage lesion\> grade 1 is found during surgery randomised in the no treatment group
No interventions assigned to this group
MTP1 joint with cartillage laesion > grade I - treatment
Patients in whom a cartilage lesion\> grade 1 is found during surgery randomised in the treatment group. They will be treated through debridement of the lesion and microfracture.
Debridement of the MTP1 cartillage lesion and microfracture
Patients with a MTP1 cartillage lesion \> grade I (based on based on the ICRS scale and an MS HoloLens measurement) randomised in the treatment group will be treated with debridement and microfracture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Debridement of the MTP1 cartillage lesion and microfracture
Patients with a MTP1 cartillage lesion \> grade I (based on based on the ICRS scale and an MS HoloLens measurement) randomised in the treatment group will be treated with debridement and microfracture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* extra pathologies other than hallux valgus
30 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tom Lootens
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tom Lootens
Principle Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MMS.2020.006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.