Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Standard of Care After Totally Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement

NCT ID: NCT04699422

Last Updated: 2022-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-03

Study Completion Date

2022-07-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to assess and compare the efficacy of a serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and our current pain protocol (Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with opioids) in the prevention and treatment of acute postoperative pain after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During the last two decades, cardiac surgical techniques changed dramatically. Evidence for good short and long-term outcome after endovascular and minimally invasive procedures is rising. The goal of avoiding sternotomy is earlier patient recovery without compromising safety. Therefore, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to aim for early extubation and ambulation. Analgesic regimens after cardiac surgery did not change significant however. Opioids remain the cornerstone of analgesia in the postoperative cardiac surgical care units, despite known side effects as nausea, constipation and risk for addiction. Neuraxial anesthetic techniques after cardiac surgery have been studied and validated to reduce opioid consumption. Their implementation in clinical practice however remains limited for two reasons. First, heparinization is required for cardiac surgery, which increases the risk neuraxial hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia, leading to deleterious complications as paraplegia. Secondly, neuraxial anesthesia induces orthosympathicolysis, enhancing vasoplegia after cardiac surgery. However, fascial plane blocks in cardiac surgery since peripheral blocks do not induce sympathicolysis and consequences of chest wall hematoma are limited.

In 2013, Blanco described the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block as an analgesic option for chest wall surgery. In this fascial plane block, local anesthetics are injected in the plane beneath the anterior serratus muscle and in the plane between latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior in an ultrasound guided manner. SAP block provides analgesia in dermatomes T2-T9. Recently, successful analgesia after SAP block has been demonstrated for soft tissue chest wall surgery, thoracotomy and rib fractures. No major side effects were reported. More specifically, no sympatholytic effects or chest wall hematoma were observed. However, up to now no prospective studies assessing the analgesic efficacy of SAP block after cardiac surgery are published. Two retrospective studies show conflicting results. Berthoud et al. retrospectively compared SAP block to continuous wound infusion after different types of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) and found reduced morphine consumption as well as shorter intensive care and hospital length of stay after SAP block. In contrast, Moll et al. found no difference in opioid consumption between SAP block and no block in patients after robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (rCABG). The authors comment they only performed the deep component of the SAP block, and some surgical entry points were outside dermatomes T2-T7.

Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a novel minimally invasive cardiosurgical technique. Surgical incision is made anteriorly in intercostal space two on the right hemithorax. Since intercostal space two is innervated by dermatomes T2-T3, somatic analgesia can be obtained with SAP block. In addition with a favorable safety profile and a minimal/non-existent risk of evoking sympatholytic effects, a SAP block may be a suitable analgesic technique to prevent/minimize postoperative pain after totally endoscopic AVR surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Surgery Cardiac Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This trial is designed as a mono-center, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled superiority trial comparing 2 groups of patients
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Patients in the experimental group will receive the serratus anterior plane block combined with postoperative PCIA with Piritramide.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Serratus anterior plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance,30 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the SAP is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. 10 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound

PCIA with Piritramide

Intervention Type DRUG

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (IVAC PCAM®, Cardinal Health or CADD pump) with piritramide (Dipidolor®, Janssen) using following settings: bolus 2 mg and lockout interval 15 min.

Control group

Patients in the control group will receive postoperative PCIA with Piritramide.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

PCIA with Piritramide

Intervention Type DRUG

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (IVAC PCAM®, Cardinal Health or CADD pump) with piritramide (Dipidolor®, Janssen) using following settings: bolus 2 mg and lockout interval 15 min.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Serratus anterior plane block

The needle will be introduced in-plane from supero-anterior to postero-inferior until the needle tip is positioned in the plane underneath the serratus muscle (deep compartment). Under continuous ultrasound guidance,30 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected in the deep compartment. After the deep component of the SAP is completed, the needle will be withdrawn to the subcutaneous tissues. The needle will be flattened and advanced in-plane to the plane superficial to the serratus muscles. 10 cc Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected superficial to the serratus muscles after correct placement of the needle tip is confirmed on ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCIA with Piritramide

A patient controlled intravenous analgesia system (IVAC PCAM®, Cardinal Health or CADD pump) with piritramide (Dipidolor®, Janssen) using following settings: bolus 2 mg and lockout interval 15 min.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PCIA with Dipidolor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement surgery via right anterolateral thoracotomy
* Adult patients (minimally 18 years old)
* EuroScore ii \< 3%
* Bodyweight \> 50 kg

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate
* Inability to communicate due to language or neurologic barriers
* Inability to control and self-administer opioids with PCIA or to comprehend the NRS pain score due to confusion or learning difficulties
* Chronic use of opioids
* Chronic use of analgesic antidepressants and/or antiepileptics
* History of major trauma or surgery to right chest wall
* History of chronic pain at right chest wall
* Allergy to opioids and/or local anesthetics
* Allergy to acetaminophen
* Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35)
* Pregnancy
* Peroperative events compromising early postoperative recovery (aortic dissection, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, cardiac tamponade, ..)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jessa Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stessel Björn

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr Bjorn Stessel

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vandenbrande J, Jamaer B, Stessel B, van Hilst E, Callebaut I, Yilmaz A, Packle L, Sermeus L, Blanco R, Jalil H. Serratus plane block versus standard of care for pain control after totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement: a double-blind, randomized controlled, superiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jun 3;49(6):429-435. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104439.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37597856 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JessaH_SAPblock

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id