Trial Outcomes & Findings for Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Restless Legs Syndrome During Opioid Medication Reduction (NCT NCT04698343)
NCT ID: NCT04698343
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Results Overview
Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of \>= 20% relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
Week 1
2024-09-19
Participant Flow
20-40 planned, 21 enrolled, 20 analyzed \[1 enrolled in planned pilot phase, not part of analysis\]
Participants undergo an iterative opioid dose reduction alongside open-label NPNS administration. Each of the two dose step-downs (Phase 1 and Phase 2) involves a 1-2-wk run-in period followed by a 1-wk assessment. This ensures resolution of opioid withdrawal symptoms and confirms NPNS usage instructions. Study ends if RLS severity increases or not tolerated. Those tolerating both phases may opt for a third dose reduction extension.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Phase 1
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Phase 2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Phase 3
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Failed to meet the required reduction in opioid dosage due to increased RLS symptoms
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
1 was discontinued based on CGI-I score exceeding 5
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Personal reasons
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
1 withdrew due to non-RLS opioid withdrawal symptoms
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Restless Legs Syndrome During Opioid Medication Reduction
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
IRLS total score at baseline, mean (SD)
|
9.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of RLS symptoms, mean (SD), y
|
31.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of prior RLS medications, mean (SD)
|
3.2 number of RLS medications
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior RLS medications, n (%) - Dopamine agonist
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior RLS medications, n (%) - Alpha-2-delta ligand
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior RLS medications, n (%) - Benzodiazepine
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior RLS medications, n (%) - Opioid
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of opioid treatment for RLS, mean (SD), years
|
8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Baseline opioid dosage, mean (SD), Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)
|
39.0 MME
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Current RLS medications, n (%) - Methadone
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Current RLS medications, n (%) - Oxycodone
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Current RLS medications, n (%) - Dopamine agonist
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Current RLS medications, n (%) - Alpha-2-delta ligand
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1Population: All eligible subjects who passed screening and were enrolled in the study
Percentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of \>= 20% relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms During the First Phase Involving an Opioid Dose Reduction of >= 20% Relative to Baseline.
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPercentage of subjects without a clinically significant increase in RLS symptoms during the first Phase involving an opioid dose reduction of \>= 1/3 relative to baseline. The clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=14 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms During the First Phase Involving an Opioid Dose Reduction of >= 1/3 Relative to Baseline.
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: These 19 subjects entered step-down #1, but 1 of the original 20 reduced their medication by 17% and so was not included in the analysis population for this secondary outcome.
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=19 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score During Step-down #1 With an Opioid Dose Reduction of >=20%
|
5.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 week into Step-down #2Population: The analysis population for this endpoint did not include the 3 subjects who were instructed to reduce opioid dose by \>= 1/3 but actually reduced opioid dose by \< 1/3 nor the 3 subjects who never were instructed to reduced opioid dose by \>= 1/3 due to dropout before that phase. Data were missing from one subject and Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used for imputation.
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=14 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score During Step-down #2 With an Opioid Dose Reduction of >=1/3
|
5.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 week into final step-downThe clinically significant increase was assessed by determining the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) score for the subject. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). Scores of 6 or 7 would be considered a clinically significant increase in RLS Symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Maximum Percent Change in Opioid Dose Relative to Baseline Without a Clinically Significant Increase in RLS Symptoms.
|
29.9 percent change
Standard Deviation 23.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 9 weeksPercentage of subjects who withdraw from study prior to the optional Phase 3 citing lack of tolerability of NPNS as the primary reason for withdrawal. The criterion for success was fewer than 20% of subjects who begin NPNS treatment withdrawing for this reason.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
NPNS Tolerability Rate - Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew From Optional Phase 3 Citing Lack of Tolerability of NPNS as the Primary Reason for Withdrawal.
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 9 weeksA Grade 2 adverse event is described as: moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living such as preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the telephone, and managing money. The success criteria was fewer than 20% Grade 2 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Grade 2 or Higher NPNS-related Adverse Events.
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 9 weeksThe criteria for success were no Grade 3 or higher NPNS-related adverse events. A Grade 3 adverse event was described as: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care Activities of Daily Living such as bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding oneself, using the toilet, taking medications, and not being bedridden. (Definition from the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009 NIH publication #- 09-7473.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Grade 3 or Higher NPNS-related Adverse Events.
|
0 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 1 week post step-downNPNS adherence was based on the percent of device usage on nights with RLS symptoms during Assessment periods. Adherence was assessed during assessment periods based on objective electronic records of completed device sessions. Subjects were instructed to complete a device session on all days with RLS symptoms. The global criterion for success percentage was \>=70%. The adherence ratio is the average days per week subjects completed device sessions divided by the average number of days that subjects experienced RLS symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=14 Participants
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
NPNS Adherence Ratio During Step-down #1 and Step-down #2.
|
85 percentage of days per week with RLS
Standard Deviation 24
|
Adverse Events
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS)
n=20 participants at risk
NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
Noninvasive Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (NPNS): NPNS device programmed to deliver active stimulation.
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Discomfort
|
45.0%
9/20 • Number of events 9 • Up to 9 weeks
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Restless Legs Syndrome
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Up to 9 weeks
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Up to 9 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place