Trial Outcomes & Findings for Task-dependent Effects of TMS on the Neural Biomarkers of Episodic Memory (NCT NCT04694131)

NCT ID: NCT04694131

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Results Overview

Participants completed a memory task with simultaneous EEG acquisition and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to either a memory-relevant parietal lobe target or a vertex control site. Participants were shown a series of objects in one of four quadrants on the screen, with TMS delivered either prior to or concurrent with the trial onset. They were instructed to remember the object and the location. This outcome measure examines the accuracy of memory for the item and the location (context), presented as the percentage of successful trials. Accuracy is shown for each stimulation condition (parietal or vertex location, before or during the trial)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

43 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 hour

Results posted on

2025-07-04

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from the NIH healthy volunteer database and the NIH postbac list serve, as well as individuals who self-referred. Recruitment of study participants occurred from July 2021 to February 2023.

43 participants were consented to the study and 32 participants successfully completed all study requirements.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Participants
Healthy participants undergoing all study procedures
Overall Study
STARTED
43
Overall Study
COMPLETED
32
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
11

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Healthy Participants
Healthy participants undergoing all study procedures
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
7
Overall Study
Screen Failure
1
Overall Study
High stimulation threshold
3

Baseline Characteristics

Task-dependent Effects of TMS on the Neural Biomarkers of Episodic Memory

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Healthy Participants
n=32 Participants
Healthy participants undergoing all study procedures
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
25.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 hour

Participants completed a memory task with simultaneous EEG acquisition and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to either a memory-relevant parietal lobe target or a vertex control site. Participants were shown a series of objects in one of four quadrants on the screen, with TMS delivered either prior to or concurrent with the trial onset. They were instructed to remember the object and the location. This outcome measure examines the accuracy of memory for the item and the location (context), presented as the percentage of successful trials. Accuracy is shown for each stimulation condition (parietal or vertex location, before or during the trial)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Item
n=32 Participants
Memory for item recognition
Context
n=32 Participants
Memory for spatial location of item
Memory Performance
Parietal, before TMS
0.89 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.64 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.03
Memory Performance
Parietal, during TMS
0.91 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.66 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.03
Memory Performance
Vertex, before TMS
0.92 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.69 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.02
Memory Performance
Vertex, during TMS
0.89 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.66 proportion accuracy
Standard Deviation 0.03

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During encoding (with TMS) and during retrieval (after TMS)

Population: Due to EEG trigger issues, only 14 subjects were able to complete the retrieval arm and have data analyzed as ERPs.

Participants completed a memory task with simultaneous EEG acquisition and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to either a memory-relevant parietal lobe target or a vertex control site. Participants were shown a series of objects in one of four quadrants on the screen, with TMS delivered either prior to or concurrent with the trial onset. They were instructed to remember the object and the location. This outcome measure examines the neural response to trials which were later remembered relative to trials which were later forgotten. Values represent the difference in average EEG amplitude, in uV, between remembered and forgotten trials and compared across each stimulation condition (parietal or vertex location, before or during the trial)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Item
n=32 Participants
Memory for item recognition
Context
n=14 Participants
Memory for spatial location of item
Late Positive Posterior (ERP) Event Related Potential
Parietal, before TMS
1.49 uV
Standard Deviation 0.83
-0.11 uV
Standard Deviation 1.47
Late Positive Posterior (ERP) Event Related Potential
Parietal, during TMS
1.43 uV
Standard Deviation 0.63
1.29 uV
Standard Deviation 1.88
Late Positive Posterior (ERP) Event Related Potential
Vertex, before TMS
0.96 uV
Standard Deviation 0.76
-0.91 uV
Standard Deviation 1.35
Late Positive Posterior (ERP) Event Related Potential
Vertex, during TMS
-1.07 uV
Standard Deviation 1.41
0.79 uV
Standard Deviation 2.16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During encoding (with TMS) and during retrieval (after TMS)

Population: Due to EEG trigger issues, only 14 subjects had retrieval data analyzed as task-evoked power

Participants completed a memory task with simultaneous EEG acquisition and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to either a memory-relevant parietal lobe target or a vertex control site. Participants were shown a series of objects in one of four quadrants on the screen, with TMS delivered either prior to or concurrent with the trial onset. They were instructed to remember the object and the location. This outcome measure examines the neural response to trials which were later remembered relative to trials which were later forgotten. Values represent the difference in average task-evoked power in the theta/alpha range (4-13Hz), in uV, between remembered and forgotten trials and compared across each stimulation condition (parietal or vertex location, before or during the trial)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Item
n=32 Participants
Memory for item recognition
Context
n=14 Participants
Memory for spatial location of item
Theta/Alpha Power
Vertex, before trial TMS
2.25 uV
Standard Deviation 5.04
0.18 uV
Standard Deviation 0.50
Theta/Alpha Power
Vertex, during trial TMS
1.07 uV
Standard Deviation 3.50
-0.06 uV
Standard Deviation 0.56
Theta/Alpha Power
Parietal, before trial TMS
1.46 uV
Standard Deviation 2.29
-0.18 uV
Standard Deviation 0.56
Theta/Alpha Power
Parietal during trial TMS
0.94 uV
Standard Deviation 3.20
0.06 uV
Standard Deviation 0.46

Adverse Events

Healthy Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Eric Wassermann

National Institutes of Health

Phone: 301-496-0151

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place