Online System for Primary Care to Prevent and Address Teen Substance Use
NCT ID: NCT04689997
Last Updated: 2023-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
5000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-01
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Primary Care iSBIRT to Reduce Serious Teen Health Risks
NCT00891631
Helping People With Health Conditions Make Birth Control Decisions
NCT03153644
A Web-Based Tool to Help People With Health Conditions Make Contraceptive Decisions
NCT07075536
Addressing Low-Income Families' Basic Social Needs at Pediatric Visits
NCT01303458
Utilizing Pediatric Primary Care Connections to Advance Reproductive Health
NCT07064837
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Research Questions
1. Of those who reported any substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual?
2. Of those who reported no substance use at their annual well-visit, is there a lower rate of reported use at 3- and 12- months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? Secondary Research Question
1\) Among all patients, is there are lower rate of reported driving after using or riding with a driver who has been using substances (risky driving/riding) at 3- and 12-months follow-up among those exposed to CHADIS-cSBI as compared to those who received treatment as usual? We will employ a cluster randomized two-group pre-test-post-test design, clustered at the provider level. Given the nature of the enhanced care and the measurement it is not possible to randomize at the patient level, and it is not necessary to randomize at the clinic level. The use of a cluster-randomized design adds complexity, and generally requires larger samples to achieve sufficient statistical power as compared to simple randomized control trials. Sample size estimates consider the design effect resulting from a cluster randomized design as well as other assumptions.
A total of 40 PCPs reporting at least 2 teen well visits per week, either in person or by telemedicine visit, will be recruited and randomly assigned in equal numbers to the enhanced care and standard care arms of the study. We will randomize clinicians stratified by whether they have completed Adolescent Medicine fellowships, as those with Adolescent Medicine training have been shown to have higher rates of addressing substance use in their practice. The authors' prior experience showed that, in a trial where the patients were randomized, individual PCPs being trained to deliver the counseling did not give similar levels of counseling to intervention and control patients. Their studies also show wide variation in patient-reported receipt of counseling across participating providers; e.g., within the intervention group, there was a range from 65%-93% across providers within one site. Such heterogeneity within a site reduces concern about contamination of practice across providers. All 12-18 year old patients in the practice will complete pre-visit screens dependent on the randomization of their own attributed PCP. While there are, in fact, three levels (i.e., patient -\> practitioner -\> practice), we confine the fundamental design herein to two levels (i.e., patient -\> practitioner). Intra-class correlations will be used to adjust sample size estimates during power analyses, and also used to account for the covariance that is presumed to exist wherein patients from the same cluster (i.e., PCP) are likely to be more similar to each other than to patients from other clusters. The study design is depicted by the following research design notation figure:
T0 T1 T2 T3 NR O X O O NR O O O
Each line represents the study timeline for an enhanced care group (i.e., first line represents the CHADIS-cSBI group; second line represents the Standard CHADIS group using CRAFFT), N: Indicates the groups are nonequivalent (i.e., subjects are not randomly assigned to treatment).
R: Indicates the groups are derived from randomly assigned PCPs (i.e., the subjects are treated by clinicians randomly assigned to a treatment protocol).
O: Indicates an observation timepoint (i.e., data collection). The first observation (T0) represents baseline substance use for patients at their well-visit; the second and third refer to follow-up assessments at 3 and 12 months post-visit.
X: Indicates the enhanced care (i.e., CHADIS-cSBI) that patients of enhanced care providers will receive.
Finally, because this will be a Quality Improvement study, and practical utility of the CHADIS-cSBI enhanced care applies at the practitioner level rather than the patient level, we will conduct all analyses using Intent to Treat groups, retaining all patients initially enrolled regardless of participation or compliance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
computerized Substance Brief Intervention cSBI
Enhanced care PCPs will address the serious morbidity of teen substance use during routine check-up visits using cSBI and follow up care using a new Module of CHADIS that facilitates guideline-based care. The CHADIS c-SBI Module will include pre-visit screening tools and embedded education that cover substance use and strengths and goals. It will also include reminders to the patient about their goals and commitments for change and teleprompted interview hints for the PCP. These hints will be aimed at enhancing a patient focused discussion of individual strengths and barriers related to the teens' goals in a motivational interviewing style.
cSBI
The standard CRAFFT SU screen has additional questions about reasons to use or not use, SU expectancies of effect and embedded education. The teens of enhanced care PCPs will also complete a Strengths and Goals tool. Data from both will be used by the PCP in counseling regarding continued abstention, reduction or cessation of SU or referral. Teens will also get monthly text messages about goals.
Standard care
Standard care PCPs will screen using a standard SU tool and carry out their usual health supervision visits without additional decision support.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cSBI
The standard CRAFFT SU screen has additional questions about reasons to use or not use, SU expectancies of effect and embedded education. The teens of enhanced care PCPs will also complete a Strengths and Goals tool. Data from both will be used by the PCP in counseling regarding continued abstention, reduction or cessation of SU or referral. Teens will also get monthly text messages about goals.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
12 Years
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Total Child Health, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Barbara J Howard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHADIS aka Total Child Health
Raymond Sturner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center for Promotion of Child Devlopment
Sion Harris, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Lydia Shrier, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Total Child Health dba CHADIS, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.