Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of ETX-018810 for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (NCT NCT04688671)
NCT ID: NCT04688671
Last Updated: 2023-11-07
Results Overview
Change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily pain score as derived from the subject's responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) a 10 point scale from 0 being the least (No Pain) to 10 being the most (Worst Possible Pain).
COMPLETED
PHASE2
167 participants
baseline to Week 4
2023-11-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ETX-018810
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
83
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
75
|
80
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ETX-018810
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of ETX-018810 for the Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=83 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=84 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
Total
n=167 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33 • n=5 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87 • n=7 Participants
|
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
135 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
83 participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 participants
n=7 Participants
|
167 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
31.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.33 • n=5 Participants
|
30.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77 • n=7 Participants
|
31.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.57 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline to Week 4Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. All subjects in this population were included in the statistical analysis comparing the groups. However, the descriptive summary for Week 4 only included those subjects who had measurements at Baseline and Week 4 (74 and 78 subjects, respectively).
Change from baseline in the weekly average of the daily pain score as derived from the subject's responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) a 10 point scale from 0 being the least (No Pain) to 10 being the most (Worst Possible Pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=74 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=78 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score as Derived From the Subject's Responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
|
-1.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.099
|
-1.91 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.781
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had assessments at each week.
Change in the weekly average of the daily pain score as derived from the subject's responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) a 10 point scale from 0 being the least (No Pain) to 10 being the most (Worst Possible Pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=78 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 1
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 2
|
15 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 3
|
16 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 4
|
16 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had assessments at each week.
Change in the weekly average of the daily pain score as derived from the subject's responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) a 10 point scale from 0 being the least (No Pain) to 10 being the most (Worst Possible Pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=78 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 1
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 2
|
21 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 3
|
25 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With a ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score
Week 4
|
26 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2 and 3Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had assessments at each week.
Change in the weekly average of the daily pain score as derived from the subject's responses on the Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) a 10 point scale from 0 being the least (No Pain) to 10 being the most (Worst Possible Pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=78 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 3
Week 1
|
-0.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.294
|
-0.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.009
|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 3
Week 2
|
-1.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.879
|
-1.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.420
|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, and 3
Week 3
|
-1.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.945
|
-1.56 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.682
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: The ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment; 83 and 84 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had a CGI-C assessment.
The Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The rater selects one response based on the following question, "Compared to your patient's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your patient changed?" Scores are as follows: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=81 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With a CGI-C Response (Defined as "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved") at Week 4
|
26 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: The ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment; 83 and 84 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects in the population had a PGI-C assessment.
The Patient Global Impression - Change (PGI-C) is the patient-reported counterpoint to the CGI C (Guy, 1976). The qualitative assessment of meaningful change is determined by the patient in response to the question, "Compared to your condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your condition changed?" Scores are as follows: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; and 7 = very much worse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=81 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With a PGI-C Response (Defined as "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved") at Week 4.
|
27 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had assessments at each week.
The Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) is an 11-point response scale that quantifies sleep interference due to pain. It is a single-item measure that is completed once daily, upon awakening, to accurately capture variability in sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis, thus minimizing recall bias. Patients are asked to select the number that best describes how much their pain has interfered with their sleep during the last 24 hours on a scale from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=78 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Sleep Score on the DSIS From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Week 1
|
-0.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.554
|
-0.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.133
|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Sleep Score on the DSIS From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Week 2
|
-1.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.967
|
-1.34 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.480
|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Sleep Score on the DSIS From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Week 3
|
-1.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.087
|
-1.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.720
|
|
Change in the Weekly Average of the Daily Sleep Score on the DSIS From Baseline to Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4
Week 4
|
-1.70 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.144
|
-1.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.900
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4Population: The ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment; 83 and 84 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had a BPI assessment.
The BPI Interference scale measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities scored on a scale from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). It is scored as the mean of the seven interference items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=81 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the BPI - Interference Scale From Baseline to Week 4
|
-1.60 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.142
|
-1.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.202
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4Population: The ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment; 83 and 84 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively. Not all subjects had a BPI assessment.
The BPI pain scale is a composite of 4 items assessing pain severity (worst, least, average, and right now). Subjects rate their pain in last 24 hours on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). It is scored as the mean of the four pain items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=81 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the BPI-Pain Scale From Baseline to Week 4
|
-1.39 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.833
|
-1.78 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.809
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to week 4Population: The modified ITT population included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least four post-baseline PI-NRS measurements; 78 and 81 subjects for the ETX-018810 and Placebo groups, respectively.
The daily amount of acetaminophen (rescue medication) that was used (mg per day).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=78 Participants
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=81 Participants
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Daily Amount of Acetaminophen Use From Baseline to Week 4
|
0 mg per day
Interval -105.9 to 0.0
|
0 mg per day
Interval -92.9 to 0.0
|
Adverse Events
ETX-018810
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=83 participants at risk
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=84 participants at risk
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ETX-018810
n=83 participants at risk
ETX-018810: Study Drug
|
Placebo
n=84 participants at risk
Placebo: Matching Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.4%
7/83 • Number of events 7 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
2.4%
2/83 • Number of events 2 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.4%
2/83 • Number of events 2 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
2.4%
2/84 • Number of events 2 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal pain
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
cellulitis
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis astroviral
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory syncytial virus infection
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diabetic foot infection
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal pruritus
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.2%
1/83 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
0.00%
0/84 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tooth fracture
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test increased
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/83 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
1.2%
1/84 • Number of events 1 • 9 weeks (up to 4 week screening period, 4 week treatment period, & 1 week follow up period)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the PI will provide the sponsor with a copy of any proposed communication at least 90 days in advance of the proposed submission or presentation date. Within this 90 day period, the sponsor will review the communication to determine whether it contains any sponsor Confidential Information, or whether the sponsor desires to file patent applications on subject matter contained therein, and to ensure the accuracy of the information.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER