Trial Outcomes & Findings for Latent Aging Mechanisms in Pain and Sleep (NCT NCT04683640)
NCT ID: NCT04683640
Last Updated: 2025-07-18
Results Overview
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. It consists of 19 items grouped into seven components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, and the component scores are summed to yield a global total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. A total score greater than 5 is typically used to distinguish poor sleepers from good sleepers.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
33 participants
PSQI was administered at baseline
2025-07-18
Participant Flow
All participants completed a screening visit and provided written informed consent before randomization. No run-in or washout phases were implemented before treatment initiation.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PLACEBO
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Latent Aging Mechanisms in Pain and Sleep
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
|
11.20 Units on a scale (0-21).
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.18 • n=5 Participants
|
9.78 Units on a scale (0-21).
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02 • n=7 Participants
|
10.43 Units on a scale (0-21).
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.59 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: PSQI was administered at baselinePopulation: Baseline characteristics for the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) are reported for participants who completed the baseline assessment and had complete PSQI data.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. It consists of 19 items grouped into seven components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, and the component scores are summed to yield a global total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. A total score greater than 5 is typically used to distinguish poor sleepers from good sleepers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): PSQI Total Score at Baseline
|
11.20 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 4.18
|
9.78 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: PSQI was administered immediately after completing the 4-week interventionPopulation: The number of participants analyzed post-intervention differs from the baseline assessment due to missing data. Two participants in Group A did not complete the PSQI at the post-intervention time point and were therefore excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over the past month. It consists of 19 items grouped into seven components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, and the component scores are summed to yield a global total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. A total score greater than 5 is typically used to distinguish poor sleepers from good sleepers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=13 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): PSQI Total Score at Post-Intervention
|
8.08 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.59
|
7.89 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.23
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: VDS was administered at baselinePopulation: The analysis population for the Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) at baseline includes all participants who were assigned to Group A (n=15) and Group B (n=18), as all completed the baseline assessment.
The Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) is a validated self-report measure of pain intensity, commonly used in older adults. Participants are asked to select the descriptor that best represents their current pain level from six options: No pain, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe, and Worst possible pain. Each descriptor corresponds to a numeric value from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) at Baseline
|
2.00 Scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
1.50 Scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: VDS was administered immediately after completing the 4-week interventionPopulation: The number of participants analyzed post-intervention differs from the baseline assessment due to missing data. Two participants in Group A did not complete the VDS at the post-intervention time point and were therefore excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) is a validated self-report measure of pain intensity, commonly used in older adults. Participants are asked to select the descriptor that best represents their current pain level from six options: No pain, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe, and Worst possible pain. Each descriptor corresponds to a numeric value from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=13 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) at Post-Intervention
|
1 Score on scale
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
1 Score on scale
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: WOMAC was administered at baseline.Population: The analysis population for the WOMAC at baseline includes all participants who were assigned to Group A (n=15) and Group B (n=18), as all completed the baseline assessment.
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a validated self-report questionnaire that assesses pain, stiffness, and physical function in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. It includes 24 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = extreme), producing subscale scores and a total score. The total WOMAC score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and functional limitations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Baseline
|
33.83 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 18.98
|
34.77 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 18.61
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: WOMAC was administered after completing the 4-week interventionThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a validated self-report questionnaire that assesses pain, stiffness, and physical function in individuals with musculoskeletal conditions. It includes 24 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = extreme), producing subscale scores and a total score. The total WOMAC score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and functional limitations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at Post-Intervention
|
22.92 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 17.98
|
34.87 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 19.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The number of participants analyzed differs from the number of participants assigned to the group due to missing data. One participant in Group B did not complete the SF-MPQ-2 at baseline time point and was, therefore, excluded from the baseline analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) is a validated 22-item self-report instrument that assesses the multidimensional experience of pain. Items are grouped into four subscales-continuous, intermittent, neuropathic, and affective pain-and each item is rated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) based on pain intensity over the past week. The total score is calculated as the average of all 22 item scores, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=17 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Total Score at Baseline
|
2.41 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
2.21 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (4 weeks)Population: The number of participants analyzed post-intervention differs from the baseline assessment due to missing data. Two participants in Group A did not complete the SF-MPQ-2 at the post-intervention time point and were, therefore, excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) is a validated 22-item self-report instrument that assesses the multidimensional experience of pain. Items are grouped into four subscales-continuous, intermittent, neuropathic, and affective pain-and each item is rated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) based on pain intensity over the past week. The total score is calculated as the average of all 22 item scores, with higher scores indicating greater pain severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=13 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) Total Score at Post-Intervention
|
1.43 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
1.77 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineThe PainDETECT Questionnaire is a validated self-report instrument used to assess the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component in individuals with chronic pain. It includes 9 items that assess pain intensity, pain patterns, and sensory descriptors. The total score ranges from -1 to 38, with higher scores indicating a greater probability of neuropathic pain. A score ≥19 suggests likely neuropathic pain, 13-18 indicates possible neuropathic pain, and ≤12 suggests that neuropathic pain is unlikely.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Detect at Baseline
|
9.23 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 5.70
|
9.39 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 6.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (4 weeks)Population: The number of participants analyzed post-intervention differs from the baseline assessment due to missing data. Two participants in Group A did not complete the Pain Detect at the post-intervention time point and were, therefore, excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The PainDETECT Questionnaire is a validated self-report instrument used to assess the likelihood of a neuropathic pain component in individuals with chronic pain. It includes 9 items that assess pain intensity, pain patterns, and sensory descriptors. The total score ranges from -1 to 38, with higher scores indicating a greater probability of neuropathic pain. A score ≥19 suggests likely neuropathic pain, 13-18 indicates possible neuropathic pain, and ≤12 suggests that neuropathic pain is unlikely.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=13 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Detect at Post-Intervention
|
6.54 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 5.17
|
8.33 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The number of participants analyzed differs from the number of participants assigned to the group due to missing data. Three participants in Group A, and two in Group B, did not complete the FOSQ-10 at the baseline time point and were, therefore, excluded from the baseline analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10) is a 10-item self-report instrument that assesses the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness on daily functioning across five domains. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (extreme difficulty) to 4 (no difficulty). The total score is calculated by averaging items within each domain and summing the domain means. Total scores range from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating better functional status and less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=12 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=16 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire - 10 Items (FOSQ-10) at Baseline
|
17.54 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
16.58 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (4 weeks)Population: The number of participants analyzed post-intervention differs from the baseline assessment due to missing data. Two participants in Group A did not complete the FOSQ-10 at the post-intervention time point and were therefore excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10) is a 10-item self-report instrument that assesses the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness on daily functioning across five domains. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (extreme difficulty) to 4 (no difficulty). The total score is calculated by averaging items within each domain and summing the domain means. Total scores range from 5 to 20, with higher scores indicating better functional status and less impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=12 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire - 10 Items (FOSQ-10) at Post-Intervention
|
12.60 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.70
|
12.48 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: The number of participants analyzed differs from the number of participants assigned to the group due to missing data. Three participants in Group A, and two in Group B, did not complete the ESS at the baseline time point and were, therefore, excluded from the baseline analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep during common daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing). The total score is calculated by summing the scores across all 8 items, yielding a total range of 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater levels of daytime sleepiness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=12 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=16 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Baseline
|
6.67 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
8.56 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 4.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately post-intervention (4 weeks)Population: The number of participants analyzed differs from the number of participants assigned to the group due to missing data. Three participants in Group A did not complete the ESS at the post-intervention time point and were, therefore, excluded from the post-intervention analysis. All other participants included had complete data.
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep during common daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing). The total score is calculated by summing the scores across all 8 items, yielding a total range of 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater levels of daytime sleepiness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=12 Participants
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 Participants
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Post-Intervention
|
7.08 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 4.44
|
7.56 Score on scale
Standard Deviation 5
|
Adverse Events
PLACEBO
GABA
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PLACEBO
n=15 participants at risk
Participants self-administered Placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) capsules (two capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
GABA
n=18 participants at risk
Participants self-administered PharmaGABA-250 (gamma-aminobutyric acid 250 mg/cap) 500 mg orally (two 250 mg capsules) daily at home at 08:00 pm for 4 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal/stomach pain
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 6 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/15 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance problems
|
0.00%
0/15 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
50.0%
9/18 • Number of events 9 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blurred vision
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 5 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Social circumstances
Causing difficulty sleeping longer
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Change in appetite
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Number of events 4 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Feelings of stress or anxiety
|
53.3%
8/15 • Number of events 8 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
44.4%
8/18 • Number of events 8 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Glucose high/ thirsty
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart rate changes/palpitations
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 5 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left shoulder pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Light-headedness/vertigo
|
40.0%
6/15 • Number of events 6 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
44.4%
8/18 • Number of events 8 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea/vomiting
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
22.2%
4/18 • Number of events 4 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right leg cramps
|
0.00%
0/15 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin rash/itching
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 5 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/15 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Changes in blood pressure
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Changes in mood
|
26.7%
4/15 • Number of events 4 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 6 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
46.7%
7/15 • Number of events 7 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
38.9%
7/18 • Number of events 7 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Drowsiness/sleepiness
|
73.3%
11/15 • Number of events 11 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
61.1%
11/18 • Number of events 11 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
General disorders
Tired
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dry throat
|
20.0%
3/15 • Number of events 3 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
50.0%
9/18 • Number of events 9 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
53.3%
8/15 • Number of events 8 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
66.7%
12/18 • Number of events 12 • From the start of the intervention through 3 months post-intervention. Adverse events were actively monitored weekly during the 4-week treatment phase and followed up for an additional 3 months after study completion
Adverse events in this study were defined as any unfavorable or unintended signs, symptoms, or conditions reported by participants during the study period, regardless of relatedness to the intervention. Adverse events were systematically assessed through weekly check-in calls during the 4-week intervention phase and continued via follow-up for 3 months post-intervention. All events reported were non-serious, local, and categorized as possibly related to the study procedures.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place