The Texture, Eating Rate and Glycaemic Index (TERAGI) Study

NCT ID: NCT04683432

Last Updated: 2020-12-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-02

Study Completion Date

2019-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: It is now recognized that diet plays a critical role in the etiology and management of chronic diseases such as type-2 diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Evidence shows an increasing prevalence of type-2 diabetes as well as obesity, whereby large consumptions of carbohydrate foods is one of the leading contribution to these diseases. Food structure and texture can be modified to control oral processing behaviour, which would have subsequent impact on total energy intake and glycaemic response through altering the food breakdown path. Whilst it has been demonstrated that foods which are eaten at a faster rate leads to more food consumed ad-libitum and therefore higher energy intake, they are also eaten at fewer chews per bite, resulting in larger food particle sizes and hence slower digestion. Therefore it is important to understand the overall net effect of the opposing outcomes of food texture and oral processing behavior, bolus properties and glycaemic response, and identify the key factors which has the biggest influence on glycaemic response. The findings from this study can be used as guidelines on meal planning and making better informed choices between foods which are of the same composition/nutrition but with different health outcomes.

Study Aims: The aim of this study is to understand how food texture and saliva characteristics influences oral processing behavior, bolus characteristics and postprandial glycaemic response.

Study Design: Randomised crossover design where participants receive 2 treatments (i.e. 2 test meals) over 2 test sessions. Test sessions will include bolus characterisation of foods where participants chew and expectorate test foods (5g each) based on a fixed chew protocol.

Study Population: Up to 40 healthy males aged 21-50 years with BMI between 18-25 kg/m2

Intervention: For test session 1 and 2, participants will receive 2 treatments (i.e. 2 test meals) in randomised order over 2 sessions. The test meals contain 50g carbohydrate load of different textures. Participants will be video recorded while consuming the test meals to derive oral processing behaviour (bites, chews, time food spent in mouth). Blood samples will be collected at baseline and post consumption (5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes) to measure glycaemic responses to the test meals. For test session 3, participants will be asked to follow a fixed chew protocol to chew and expectorate 3 test foods while being video recorded. Similarly, oral processing behaviours will be analysed from the recorded videos. The spat out food samples (i.e. bolus samples) will be analysed for saliva uptake and bolus particle size indicating extent of food breakdown.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Aims:

The aim of this study is to understand how food texture and saliva characteristics influences oral processing behavior, bolus characteristics and postprandial glycaemic response.

The study hypothesizes that foods with a more elastic texture are eaten slower and requires more chewing, resulting in smaller bolus particle sizes and therefore higher postprandial glycaemic response due to an increased surface area for enzymatic digestion. Participants with higher saliva flowrate and/or alpha-amylase activity would also have shorter eating times and higher postprandial glycaemic responses.

Study Design:

Oral processing behaviours have high individual variances (Bolhuis et al 2013; Ketel et al 2019) and a large sample size is required in order to get significant differences between treatments. Based on previous papers on food texture and oral processing, a minimum of 20 healthy young male Chinese participants will be recruited in this study.

The study will require participants to attend 1 screening session (1 hour) and 3 test sessions (3 hours for test sessions 1 and 2; 1 hour for test session 3).

Screening (1 hour):

All potential participants will be asked to give informed consent before taking part in any of the research activities. Baseline measurements including anthropometric (height, weight, percentage body fat using a Bioelectrical Impedance Analyser), fasting blood glucose via finger prick and blood pressure will be taken to access eligibility.

Successfully screened participants will proceed to complete intraoral volume capacity measured using simple sip-and-spit measures, as well as provide stimulated and unstimulated saliva sample (approximately 4 x 5 ml each) via passive drooling to assess their saliva flowrates and saliva alpha-amylase activity.

Test Foods:

Commercially available and commonly consumed foods (e.g. white rice, korean rice cake, carrot, biscuits, etc.) are safe for human consumption and prepared in line with safe hygienic food preparation

Test session 1 and 2 (3 hours each):

Participants will be informed to fast 10 to 12 hours prior to test session 1 and 2. They are required to arrive the test centre between 08:00 - 09:00 a.m.

Participants will be asked to consume a test meal during each session, consisting of a 'fast' (less elastic texture and eaten more quickly) or 'slow' food (more elastic texture and eaten more slowly) in total. The order of test foods presented will be randomised. These test foods will be of the same carbohydrate load (50g carbohydrate) with different textures (i.e. white rice vs. rice cakes).

A baseline finger prick blood sample will be taken. After obtaining the baseline blood samples, test meal will be given to the participant to consumed within 15 minutes while being video recorded using a laptop webcam at face level. Following consumption of the test meal, finger prick blood samples will be taken for the next 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The amount of blood that will be collected at every time point will be about a drop of blood (approximately 0.5ml per time point and 5 ml in total).

Sensory and textural ratings of the test meal will be taken using a visual analogue scale on a laptop. Post-meal satiety responses using a visual analogue scale will also be collected on a laptop every 15 minutes.

After completion of blood collection and satiety responses, the participant will be asked to chew on a separate portion of test meal (5g) until ready to swallow, and will be asked to expectorate the food bolus to assess their bolus properties including saliva uptake and particle size distribution. Video-recordings of the participant chewing the test foods will be taken.

A set of ad-libitum snacks will be provided to participants after all the measurements have been completed.

Test sessions 1 and 2 will be interspaced by a minimum of 5 days.

Test session 3 (1 hour):

Participants will be asked to chew on 3 test foods (white rice, rice cake, raw carrot) using a fixed chew protocol (i.e. 15 chews, 30 chews and chew until point of first swallow) and then expectorating the bolus to assess their bolus properties including saliva uptake and particle size distribution. Video-recordings of the participant chewing the test foods will be taken.

Sessions 2 and 3 will be interspaced by a minimum of 1 day.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adults

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Eating behaviour Eating rate Glycaemic response Texture Satiety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male
* Chinese ethnicity
* Age between 21-40 years
* Weigh at least 45 kg
* Body mass index between 18to 25 kg/m²
* Normal blood pressure (\</=140/90 mmHg)
* Fasting blood glucose \<6.0 mmol/L
* Healthy dentition and ability to bite, chew and swallow normally
* No history of pain or discomfort in jaw movements or excessive teeth clenching or grinding, no caries or periodontal disease and no impaired salivation functions

Exclusion Criteria

* Partake in sports at the competitive and/or endurance levels
* Have known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
* Have known history of anaemia or thalassemia minor
* Have major chronic disease such as heart disease, cancer or diabetes mellitus
* Take insulin or drugs known to affect glucose metabolism
* Intentionally restrict food intake
* Have major medical or surgical event requiring hospitalization within the preceding 3 months
* Have taken antibiotics for 3 months before the study period
* Smoker
* Overnight shift worker
* Have any known food allergy (eg. anaphylaxis to peanuts)
* Have an active Tuberculosis (TB) condition or currently receiving treatment for TB
* Have any known Chronic Infection or known to suffer from or have previously suffered from or is a carrier of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus(HCV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
* Member of the research team or their immediate family members. Immediate family member is defined as a spouse, parent, child, or sibling, whether biological or legally adopted
* Enrolled in a concurrent research study judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with the study of the CNRC
* Have poor veins impeding venous access
* Have any history of severe vasovagal syncope (blackouts or near faints) following blood draws
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ciaran Forde, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI)/Clinical Nutrition Research Centre

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goh AT, Chatonidi G, Choy M, Ponnalagu S, Stieger M, Forde CG. Impact of Individual Differences in Eating Rate on Oral Processing, Bolus Properties and Post-Meal Glucose Responses. Physiol Behav. 2021 Sep 1;238:113495. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113495. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34116051 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/01091

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id