Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants (NCT NCT04682730)
NCT ID: NCT04682730
Last Updated: 2023-07-12
Results Overview
The change in the providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention
COMPLETED
NA
896 participants
from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year.
2023-07-12
Participant Flow
All providers and staff at 16 intervention clinics at Kaiser Permanente (KP). Overall study - January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial where dental clinics were randomized to the Deliberative Loop intervention. Clinics were randomized to one of five intervention periods. We randomized three clinics at a time. The goal was to have a six-week window in which to run the three clinics that are in a given step and then a week gap before the next step's six-week window starts.
Unit of analysis: Dental Clinic
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop (DL) Vanguard
January 1, 2021- March 22, 2021 (3 months) non intervention period
March 23, 2021- December 31, 2021 (9 months) intervention period
|
DL Cluster 1
January 1, 2021 - April 29, 2021 or May 12, 2021 (4 - 4.5 months) non-intervention
April 30, 2021 or May 13, 2021 (7.5 - 8 months) intervention
|
DL Cluster 2
January 1, 2021 - June 17 or June 21 or June 24, 2021 ( 5.5 - 6 months) non-intervention
June 18 or June 22 or June 25, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (6 - 6.5 months) intervention
|
DL Cluster 3
January 1, 2021 - July 1 or July 28 or August 8, 2021 ( 6 - 7.5 months) non-intervention
July 2 or July 29 or August 9, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (4.5 - 6 months) intervention
|
DL Cluster 4
January 1, 2021 - September 14 or October 7, 2021 ( 8.5 - 9 months) non-intervention
September 15 or October 8, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (3 - 3.5 months) intervention
|
DL Cluster 5
January 1, 2021 - September 23 or October 7 or October 28, 2021 ( 9 - 10 months) non intervention
September 24 or October 8 or October 29, 2021 - December 31, 2021 ( 2 - 3 months) intervention
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
47 1
|
166 3
|
190 3
|
164 3
|
131 3
|
198 3
|
|
Overall Study
Intro Session
|
48 1
|
80 3
|
83 3
|
68 3
|
60 3
|
58 3
|
|
Overall Study
Deliberative Forum
|
25 1
|
89 3
|
76 3
|
64 3
|
54 3
|
55 3
|
|
Overall Study
Surveys Received
|
8 1
|
70 3
|
55 3
|
42 3
|
48 3
|
30 3
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8 1
|
70 3
|
55 3
|
42 3
|
48 3
|
30 3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
39 0
|
96 0
|
135 0
|
122 0
|
83 0
|
168 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Study Participants - Deliberative Loop
n=5983 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
671 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
549 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
635 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
520 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
680 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Provider rate of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs
|
137 Teeth
n=176 Teeth
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year.Population: The study participants are dental providers/staff. However, our primary outcome measured the change in the dental providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention. Therefore, the units analyzed were teeth of the providers' patients. The number of participant providers that apply to the 9600 teeth is not available.
The change in the providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=9600 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Providers' Rates of Placing or Treatment Planning Sealants for Occlusal NCCLs
Pre-intervention
|
137 Teeth
|
|
Change in Providers' Rates of Placing or Treatment Planning Sealants for Occlusal NCCLs
Post-intervention
|
95 Teeth
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: KPNW Dental system
Program costs: Total intervention costs. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=1 Dental System
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Total Program Costs
|
125,521 dollars
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: 16 dental clinics
Program costs: Cost per clinic
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=16 dental clinics
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Cost Per Clinic
|
7845 dollars per clinic
Interval 6378.0 to 9312.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: 265,200 members age 6 yrs or more on January 1, 2021 x 12 months.
Total intervention costs per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=3182400 Members/patients
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Cost Per Member Per Month (PMPM)
|
0.039 dollars per member per month
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: KPNW Dental System. All costs reported are automatically annualized. Originally we thought the intervention would cross calendar years. Since the intervention took place entirely in 2021, it is automatically annualized.
Program costs: Annualized costs for guideline implementation interventions
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=1 dental system
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Annualized Costs for Guideline Implementation Interventions
|
125,521 dollars
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: Within KPNW Dental system, teeth receiving a sealant.
Total intervention costs per sealant. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=95 teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealant
|
1321 dollars per sealant
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: KPNW Dental System / 16 intervention clinics
Program costs: NCCL treatment costs- Total program costs per sealant per clinic
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=16 dental clinics
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealant Per Clinic
|
1321 dollars per sealant per clinic
Interval 845.0 to 3208.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 yearPopulation: 265,200 members age 6 yrs or more on Jan1, 2021
Total intervention costs per sealant per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=265200 Members/patients
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
NCCL Treatment Costs- Per Sealant Per Member Per Month (PMPM)
|
0.0004 dollars per sealant PMPM
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: when a clinic was exposed to the intervention (when they received their survey results) to December 31, 2021. (Vanguard- 9.34 months; Cluster 1- 7.84 months; Cluster 2- 6.39 months; Cluster 3- 5.30 months; Cluster 4- 3.33 months; Cluster 5- 2.75 months)Population: Teeth with a treatment plan
The count of occlusal NCCLs with a treatment plan for sealants that is sealed by the end of the post-intervention evaluation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=89 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Sealant Treatment Plan Resolution
|
89 Teeth
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 yearPopulation: Cost-effectiveness analyses are not conducted for interventions that are found to be ineffective compared to controls. Therefore, measure could not be assessed due to the results of the primary outcome measure.
Estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for clinics after exposure to the intervention. ICERs calculated for annualized total costs, costs per clinic, and costs PMPM.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: A single assessment following completion of all data analyses, approximately 1.5 years after the data collection end date.Population: PDA Dental Director for Evidence Based Practice - this is one person
management's perceptions of the acceptability of the Deliberative Loop process measured on a 5-point Likert scale, 0=not at all acceptable to 4=completely acceptable These ratings were dependent upon having all other analyses completed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=1 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Acceptability, Management - Deliberative Loop Process
|
1.5 score on a scale
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in deliberative loop process and UBT process. Same participants.
Stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability of the Deliberative Loop process, 1 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly Disagree, 4=Strongly Agree A higher score means more acceptability. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=206 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Deliberative Loop Process
Deliberative Loop
|
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Deliberative Loop Process
UBT
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Post deliberative loop session survey respondents.
Stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability of the Context-Setting Document, 3 questions measured on a 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 12=Strongly agree. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 12. A higher score means more acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=213 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Context Setting Document
|
6.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.
Stakeholders' perceptions of helpfulness of group discussion measured on a 3 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 12=Strongly agree. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 12. A higher score means more helpfulness. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Helpfulness of Group Discussion
UBT helpfulness
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
|
|
Helpfulness of Group Discussion
Deliberative loop helpfulness
|
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.
Stakeholders' perceptions of ability to express new ideas or suggestions for improving the clinic, 5 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-20, 0=Strongly disagree to 20=Strongly agree. A higher score means more promotive voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Promotive Voice
Deliberative Loop
|
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
|
Promotive Voice
UBT
|
15.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions. Same participants.
Stakeholders' perceptions of ability to express concern about work practices that may be harmful to the clinic, 5 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-20, 0=Strongly disagree to 20=Strongly agree. A higher score means more prohibitive voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Prohibitive Voice
Deliberative Loop
|
10.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
|
Prohibitive Voice
UBT
|
13.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in deliberative loop session who filled out the post-session survey
Stakeholders' perceptions that suggestions will be taken into consideration by leadership, 1 item, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree A higher score means more leadership responsiveness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=212 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Future Leadership Responsiveness
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in the deliberative loop session who filled out the post-session survey.
Stakeholders' perceptions that suggestions have been taken into consideration by leadership in the past, 2 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-8, 0=Strongly disagree to 8=Strongly agree. A higher score means more stakeholder perception of leadership responsiveness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=218 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Past Leadership Responsiveness
|
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.
Stakeholders' perceptions of voice, 1 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree A higher score means more overall voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=206 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Voice
Deliberative Loop Session
|
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Overall Voice
UBT Session
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions
Stakeholders' perceptions about the discussion, 2 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 8, 0=Strongly disagree to 8=Strongly agree. A higher score means more consideration of important issues and points of view. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Deliberative Loop
n=203 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey
Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions.
Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
|
|---|---|
|
Perceptions of Discussion
Deliberative Loop Session
|
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Perceptions of Discussion
UBT Session
|
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.Stakeholders' informed opinion about what implementation strategies their clinic should adopt for each barrier
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the DL session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the session.Stakeholders' informed opinion about barriers they perceive in their clinic
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after receiving the clinic summary reportList of implementation strategies. Clinic staff can select strategies on the list that their clinic has adopted to document progress of the implementation process
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 3 months after receiving the clinic summary reportqualitative interviews of clinic staff, using the quantitative forms as the basis for the interview
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Deliberative Loop
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place