Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants (NCT NCT04682730)

NCT ID: NCT04682730

Last Updated: 2023-07-12

Results Overview

The change in the providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

896 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year.

Results posted on

2023-07-12

Participant Flow

All providers and staff at 16 intervention clinics at Kaiser Permanente (KP). Overall study - January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021

This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial where dental clinics were randomized to the Deliberative Loop intervention. Clinics were randomized to one of five intervention periods. We randomized three clinics at a time. The goal was to have a six-week window in which to run the three clinics that are in a given step and then a week gap before the next step's six-week window starts.

Unit of analysis: Dental Clinic

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Deliberative Loop (DL) Vanguard
January 1, 2021- March 22, 2021 (3 months) non intervention period March 23, 2021- December 31, 2021 (9 months) intervention period
DL Cluster 1
January 1, 2021 - April 29, 2021 or May 12, 2021 (4 - 4.5 months) non-intervention April 30, 2021 or May 13, 2021 (7.5 - 8 months) intervention
DL Cluster 2
January 1, 2021 - June 17 or June 21 or June 24, 2021 ( 5.5 - 6 months) non-intervention June 18 or June 22 or June 25, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (6 - 6.5 months) intervention
DL Cluster 3
January 1, 2021 - July 1 or July 28 or August 8, 2021 ( 6 - 7.5 months) non-intervention July 2 or July 29 or August 9, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (4.5 - 6 months) intervention
DL Cluster 4
January 1, 2021 - September 14 or October 7, 2021 ( 8.5 - 9 months) non-intervention September 15 or October 8, 2021 - December 31, 2021 (3 - 3.5 months) intervention
DL Cluster 5
January 1, 2021 - September 23 or October 7 or October 28, 2021 ( 9 - 10 months) non intervention September 24 or October 8 or October 29, 2021 - December 31, 2021 ( 2 - 3 months) intervention
Overall Study
STARTED
47 1
166 3
190 3
164 3
131 3
198 3
Overall Study
Intro Session
48 1
80 3
83 3
68 3
60 3
58 3
Overall Study
Deliberative Forum
25 1
89 3
76 3
64 3
54 3
55 3
Overall Study
Surveys Received
8 1
70 3
55 3
42 3
48 3
30 3
Overall Study
COMPLETED
8 1
70 3
55 3
42 3
48 3
30 3
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
39 0
96 0
135 0
122 0
83 0
168 0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Study Participants - Deliberative Loop
n=5983 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
671 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
549 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
635 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
520 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
680 participants
n=5 Participants
Provider rate of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs
137 Teeth
n=176 Teeth

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year.

Population: The study participants are dental providers/staff. However, our primary outcome measured the change in the dental providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention. Therefore, the units analyzed were teeth of the providers' patients. The number of participant providers that apply to the 9600 teeth is not available.

The change in the providers' rates of placing or treatment planning sealants for occlusal NCCLs from before to after clinic stakeholders are exposed to the Deliberative Loop intervention

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=9600 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Change in Providers' Rates of Placing or Treatment Planning Sealants for Occlusal NCCLs
Pre-intervention
137 Teeth
Change in Providers' Rates of Placing or Treatment Planning Sealants for Occlusal NCCLs
Post-intervention
95 Teeth

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: KPNW Dental system

Program costs: Total intervention costs. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=1 Dental System
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Total Program Costs
125,521 dollars

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: 16 dental clinics

Program costs: Cost per clinic

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=16 dental clinics
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Cost Per Clinic
7845 dollars per clinic
Interval 6378.0 to 9312.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: 265,200 members age 6 yrs or more on January 1, 2021 x 12 months.

Total intervention costs per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=3182400 Members/patients
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Cost Per Member Per Month (PMPM)
0.039 dollars per member per month

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: KPNW Dental System. All costs reported are automatically annualized. Originally we thought the intervention would cross calendar years. Since the intervention took place entirely in 2021, it is automatically annualized.

Program costs: Annualized costs for guideline implementation interventions

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=1 dental system
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Annualized Costs for Guideline Implementation Interventions
125,521 dollars

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: Within KPNW Dental system, teeth receiving a sealant.

Total intervention costs per sealant. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=95 teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealant
1321 dollars per sealant

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: KPNW Dental System / 16 intervention clinics

Program costs: NCCL treatment costs- Total program costs per sealant per clinic

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=16 dental clinics
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
NCCL Treatment Costs- Total Program Costs Per Sealant Per Clinic
1321 dollars per sealant per clinic
Interval 845.0 to 3208.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from planning the survey to gather background information to two months after the final step; an average of 1 year

Population: 265,200 members age 6 yrs or more on Jan1, 2021

Total intervention costs per sealant per member per month. Program cost analysis conducted for the Deliberative Loop (DL) intervention using an opportunity cost approach. Program costs were estimated for the DL intervention (Workbook development - including the guideline, EHR data analyses, initial practitioner survey, and evidence review - and printing; Online DL session facilitator training and delivery, and program tailoring; dental office staff time; costs for implemented strategies, if applicable; and allowed charges for dental sealant placements). All costs are reported in 2021 dollars. The study analysis period was Jan 1-Dec 31, 2021, and in 16 clinics during 2021. There were 95 sealants placed during the intervention period at 16 clinics. There were 265,200 members age 6 years or more on January 1, 2021, or a total of 3,182,400 member months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=265200 Members/patients
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
NCCL Treatment Costs- Per Sealant Per Member Per Month (PMPM)
0.0004 dollars per sealant PMPM

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: when a clinic was exposed to the intervention (when they received their survey results) to December 31, 2021. (Vanguard- 9.34 months; Cluster 1- 7.84 months; Cluster 2- 6.39 months; Cluster 3- 5.30 months; Cluster 4- 3.33 months; Cluster 5- 2.75 months)

Population: Teeth with a treatment plan

The count of occlusal NCCLs with a treatment plan for sealants that is sealed by the end of the post-intervention evaluation period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=89 Teeth
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Sealant Treatment Plan Resolution
89 Teeth

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from one month before the first step to two months after the final step, 1 year

Population: Cost-effectiveness analyses are not conducted for interventions that are found to be ineffective compared to controls. Therefore, measure could not be assessed due to the results of the primary outcome measure.

Estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for clinics after exposure to the intervention. ICERs calculated for annualized total costs, costs per clinic, and costs PMPM.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: A single assessment following completion of all data analyses, approximately 1.5 years after the data collection end date.

Population: PDA Dental Director for Evidence Based Practice - this is one person

management's perceptions of the acceptability of the Deliberative Loop process measured on a 5-point Likert scale, 0=not at all acceptable to 4=completely acceptable These ratings were dependent upon having all other analyses completed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=1 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Acceptability, Management - Deliberative Loop Process
1.5 score on a scale

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in deliberative loop process and UBT process. Same participants.

Stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability of the Deliberative Loop process, 1 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly Disagree, 4=Strongly Agree A higher score means more acceptability. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=206 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Deliberative Loop Process
Deliberative Loop
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Deliberative Loop Process
UBT
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Post deliberative loop session survey respondents.

Stakeholders' perceptions of the acceptability of the Context-Setting Document, 3 questions measured on a 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 12=Strongly agree. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 12. A higher score means more acceptability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=213 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Acceptability, Stakeholders - Context Setting Document
6.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.

Stakeholders' perceptions of helpfulness of group discussion measured on a 3 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 12=Strongly agree. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 12. A higher score means more helpfulness. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Helpfulness of Group Discussion
UBT helpfulness
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
Helpfulness of Group Discussion
Deliberative loop helpfulness
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.

Stakeholders' perceptions of ability to express new ideas or suggestions for improving the clinic, 5 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-20, 0=Strongly disagree to 20=Strongly agree. A higher score means more promotive voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Promotive Voice
Deliberative Loop
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
Promotive Voice
UBT
15.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions. Same participants.

Stakeholders' perceptions of ability to express concern about work practices that may be harmful to the clinic, 5 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-20, 0=Strongly disagree to 20=Strongly agree. A higher score means more prohibitive voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=217 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Prohibitive Voice
Deliberative Loop
10.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
Prohibitive Voice
UBT
13.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in deliberative loop session who filled out the post-session survey

Stakeholders' perceptions that suggestions will be taken into consideration by leadership, 1 item, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree A higher score means more leadership responsiveness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=212 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Future Leadership Responsiveness
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in the deliberative loop session who filled out the post-session survey.

Stakeholders' perceptions that suggestions have been taken into consideration by leadership in the past, 2 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0-8, 0=Strongly disagree to 8=Strongly agree. A higher score means more stakeholder perception of leadership responsiveness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=218 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Past Leadership Responsiveness
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions.

Stakeholders' perceptions of voice, 1 question, 5-point Likert scale, 0=Strongly disagree to 4=Strongly agree A higher score means more overall voice. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=206 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Overall Voice
Deliberative Loop Session
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3
Overall Voice
UBT Session
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Population: Participants in both deliberative loop and UBT sessions

Stakeholders' perceptions about the discussion, 2 questions, 5-point Likert scale. Note - Each item is 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 - 8, 0=Strongly disagree to 8=Strongly agree. A higher score means more consideration of important issues and points of view. Note: UBT stands for unit-based team. It is a group of frontline employees, including managers, dental staff (assistants, hygienists), and dentists who work together. UBTs hold regular meetings as part of their standard work flow and collaborate with one another to improve member and patient care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Deliberative Loop
n=203 Participants
28-page Context-Setting Document; 2-page addendum to Context-Setting Document; 90 minute Deliberative session; 8-page post-session survey Deliberative Loop: The investigators will give background information to the stakeholders before they engage in the Deliberative session. Stakeholders from a given clinic will come together for a Deliberative session (i.e., facilitated conversation), enabling them to hear the full range of perspectives held by their fellow colleagues and to share their own perspective regarding how best to implement the guideline in small-group discussions. Following the Deliberative session, each stakeholder will have the opportunity to record their opinions regarding possible implementation interventions. The investigators will share these opinions with the clinic's decision-makers to help guide their decision-making about which implementation interventions to deploy. If a stakeholder happens to be absent the day of their clinic's Deliberative session, they will still have the opportunity to complete the survey.
Perceptions of Discussion
Deliberative Loop Session
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
Perceptions of Discussion
UBT Session
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the deliberative loop session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the deliberative loop session.

Stakeholders' informed opinion about what implementation strategies their clinic should adopt for each barrier

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: One survey was available for participants to complete immediately following the DL session and the survey stayed available for 1 week following the session.

Stakeholders' informed opinion about barriers they perceive in their clinic

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months after receiving the clinic summary report

List of implementation strategies. Clinic staff can select strategies on the list that their clinic has adopted to document progress of the implementation process

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3 months after receiving the clinic summary report

qualitative interviews of clinic staff, using the quantitative forms as the basis for the interview

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Deliberative Loop

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Deborah Polk, PhD

University of Pittsburgh

Phone: 14126488656

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place