Fascia Lata Allograft Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Peri-Implant Mucosal Thickness Enhancement.

NCT ID: NCT04679922

Last Updated: 2020-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-10

Study Completion Date

2020-11-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this, randomized clinical trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of fascia lata allograft in terms of peri-implant mucosal augmentation, as compared to autologous sub epithelial connective tissue graft, clinically and histologically in human adults .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this, randomized clinical trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of fascia lata allograft in terms of peri-implant mucosal augmentation, as compared to autologous sub epithelial connective tissue graft, clinically and histologically in human adults .

The hypothesis of the study is that a similar gain in peri implant mucosal thicknesses will be obtained in sites treated by either a sub epithelial connective tissue graft or a newly developed fascia lata allograft in clinically and histologically in human.

The objective of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy of the peri-implant mucosal thickness enhancement following either subepithelial connective tissue grafts or human Fascia Lata Allograft placed simultaneously with dental implant placement.

Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Participants will be randomized to the control (simultaneous SCTGs) or test (simultaneous FLA) group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implant Tissue Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peri Implant mucosal thickness connective tissue graft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Soft Tissue Enhancement around dental implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Sixteen sites that were met the subsequent inclusion criteria were eligible to contribute in our study were classified randomly by the sealed envelope technique into two treatment groups, 8 sites in each group. Group I (Control Group): Autogenous SCTGs harvested from the palate +dental implants \*. Group II (Experimental Group): FLA \*\*+dental implants. The allocation was withheld from the surgeon (M.H.) until just before the surgical appointment. The clinical examiner (M.S.) was masked to the treatment group for the extent of the study.Three months after implantation, the sites were located, and the thickness of the mucosa will be evaluated using the customized stent. The operculectomy will be performed following the method of Flatebo et al.,22 collecting biopsy specimens of almost constant quality and evaluating clinical thickness without mucosal distortions

Peri Implant mucosal thickness fascia lata graft

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Soft Tissue Enhancement around dental implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Sixteen sites that were met the subsequent inclusion criteria were eligible to contribute in our study were classified randomly by the sealed envelope technique into two treatment groups, 8 sites in each group. Group I (Control Group): Autogenous SCTGs harvested from the palate +dental implants \*. Group II (Experimental Group): FLA \*\*+dental implants. The allocation was withheld from the surgeon (M.H.) until just before the surgical appointment. The clinical examiner (M.S.) was masked to the treatment group for the extent of the study.Three months after implantation, the sites were located, and the thickness of the mucosa will be evaluated using the customized stent. The operculectomy will be performed following the method of Flatebo et al.,22 collecting biopsy specimens of almost constant quality and evaluating clinical thickness without mucosal distortions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Soft Tissue Enhancement around dental implant

Sixteen sites that are indicated for peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement will be selected. Sixteen sites that were met the subsequent inclusion criteria were eligible to contribute in our study were classified randomly by the sealed envelope technique into two treatment groups, 8 sites in each group. Group I (Control Group): Autogenous SCTGs harvested from the palate +dental implants \*. Group II (Experimental Group): FLA \*\*+dental implants. The allocation was withheld from the surgeon (M.H.) until just before the surgical appointment. The clinical examiner (M.S.) was masked to the treatment group for the extent of the study.Three months after implantation, the sites were located, and the thickness of the mucosa will be evaluated using the customized stent. The operculectomy will be performed following the method of Flatebo et al.,22 collecting biopsy specimens of almost constant quality and evaluating clinical thickness without mucosal distortions

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Ability to maintain good oral hygiene as evidenced in recall visits. Aged 30 to 55 years. Stable periodontal condition and missing one single tooth (maxillary anterior teeth and premolars) with adjacent teeth present and thin mucosal phenotype (\< 2mm bucco- lingual thickness).

Exclusion Criteria

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Females who were pregnant, or attempting to become pregnant, and nursing mothers.

Acute infection in the area intended for implant placement.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mohamed Hamdy Helal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Hamdy Helal

Assistant Professor Malak Yousef Mohamed Shoukheba

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of dentistry Tanta University

Tanta, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OMPDR-07-19-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id