Trial Outcomes & Findings for Same Day Oral EC and Implant Initiation (NCT NCT04678817)
NCT ID: NCT04678817
Last Updated: 2025-04-15
Results Overview
To determine a point estimate for the one-month pregnancy rate following guideline supported same-day initiation of an etonogestrel (ENG) implant plus oral levonorgestrel (LNG) emergency contraception (EC).
COMPLETED
306 participants
one month
2025-04-15
Participant Flow
Emergency contraception clients age 18-35y at four Utah family planning clinics between February 2021 and April 2023 received information about oral emergency contraception and three long acting reversible contraception options: the etonogestrel implant with same-day oral levonogestrel, the 52mf levonogestrel intrauterine device, and the copper T380A intrauterine device.
We excluded nine potential participants for long acting reversible contraception contraindications and another four due to failed intrauterine device insertions
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
Participants who select the Etonogestrel implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
160
|
61
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
132
|
61
|
72
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
28
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
Participants who select the Etonogestrel implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
28
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Same Day Oral EC and Implant Initiation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
n=160 Participants
Participants who select the Etonogestrel implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
n=61 Participants
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
n=72 Participants
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
Total
n=293 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<20 years
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
20-24 years
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
130 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
25-29 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
30+ years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
160 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
293 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/ African American
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/ Latina
|
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race not listed
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
160 participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 participants
n=7 Participants
|
72 participants
n=5 Participants
|
293 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
< 25 kg/m2
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
148 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
25 - 29.9 kg/m2
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
30+ kg/m2
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
74 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
missing
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one monthPopulation: Participants who selected the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception reported pregnancy test results at 1 month post enrollment. Participants who selected a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device or a Copper T380A Intrauterine Device only completed an enrollment survey and were not followed for longitudinal outcomes.
To determine a point estimate for the one-month pregnancy rate following guideline supported same-day initiation of an etonogestrel (ENG) implant plus oral levonorgestrel (LNG) emergency contraception (EC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
n=153 Participants
Participants who selected the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pregnancy Rate at One-month
|
1.96 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 6.07
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Number of participants choosing each method out of total 293 enrolled
To determine the proportion of EC clients willing to initiate a same-day ENG implant with oral LNG EC compared to same-day initiation of intrauterine devices for EC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
n=160 Participants
Participants who selected the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
n=61 Participants
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
n=72 Participants
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Comparing Proportions of EC Clients Desiring ENG Implant With Oral EC vs IUD
|
54.6 percentage of participants
|
20.8 percentage of participants
|
24.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Number of participants from Arm 1 who selected an etonogestrel implant and completed a 12 month follow up survey. The outcome measure below is the percentage who reported implant continuation at 12 months. Participants who selected a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device or a Copper T380A Intrauterine Device only completed an enrollment survey and were not followed for longitudinal outcomes.
12-month continuation rate of the ENG implant with same-day initiation at an EC encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
n=132 Participants
Participants who selected the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Continuation Rate
|
79 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Number of participants from Arm 1 who selected an etonogestrel implant and reported discontinuation of the implant in the 12 months of follow up survey.s The outcome measures below are the percentage who reported reasons for method implant discontinuation. More than 1 reason could be selected by participants. Participants who selected a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device or a Copper T380A Intrauterine Device only completed an enrollment survey and were not followed for longitudinal outcomes.
Rate and reasons for ENG implant discontinuation in the 12 months following same-day initiation at an EC encounter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
n=53 Participants
Participants who selected the Etonogestrel contraceptive implant with oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
|
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the levonorgestrel intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
|
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Participants who select the Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception
Copper T380A intrauterine device: Participants who present for emergency contraception and select the Copper T380A intrauterine device
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Discontinuation Rate and Reasons
Discontinued for mood changes
|
41 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Discontinuation Rate and Reasons
Discontinued for bleeding
|
51 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Discontinuation Rate and Reasons
Discontinued for weight gain
|
37 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Discontinuation Rate and Reasons
Discontinued for bloating
|
24 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Discontinuation Rate and Reasons
Discontinued for cramping
|
20 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant With Oral Levonorgestrel
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device
Copper T380A Intrauterine Device
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place