Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate Safety, Engraftment, and Efficacy of VC-01 in Subjects With T1 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT04678557)
NCT ID: NCT04678557
Last Updated: 2023-10-18
Results Overview
Through histology, the potential for functional engraftment of VC-01 combination product could be assessed in Cohort 1 subjects. Explanted sentinel units from subjects were processed and stained for markers identifying the number of graft cell nuclei (i.e., signifying the cells were viable). The percentage of viable graft cells in these explanted units were then compared to the percentage of viable graft cells from the pre-clinical (i.e., animal) models. These pre-clinical models are based on animal studies performed at ViaCyte (ref: internal study report). The data in Outcome Measure Data Table represent the % of viable graft cells present in the explanted sentinels compared to what was expected based on the animal model at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 26 (e.g., At Week 4, there was an average of 18.27% viable graft cells in the participant's explants compared to what was expected based on the animal models).
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
31 participants
Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 26
2023-10-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
8 or 10 Sentinel Units Implanted (Cohort 1)
VC-01 combination product is comprised of PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System. In Cohort 1 of this study, 8 or 10 VC-01 sentinel units were surgically implanted in each subject during a single procedure. Sentinel units are smaller versions of the product not intended to provide efficacy but are instead explanted at various timepoints over the course of the study and examined histologically.
|
9 Dose Finding Units Implanted (Cohort 2)
A total of 12 VC-01 units were implanted in each of the Cohort 2 subjects in a single surgical procedure. Of those units, 9 were VC-01 Dose Finding (DF) units. DF units are larger than sentinels and intended to remain implanted during the duration of participation in the trial to assess efficacy.
The remaining 3 units implanted were the smaller VC-01 sentinel units intended for explant at various time points for analysis histologically.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
17
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
8 or 10 Sentinel Units Implanted (Cohort 1)
VC-01 combination product is comprised of PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System. In Cohort 1 of this study, 8 or 10 VC-01 sentinel units were surgically implanted in each subject during a single procedure. Sentinel units are smaller versions of the product not intended to provide efficacy but are instead explanted at various timepoints over the course of the study and examined histologically.
|
9 Dose Finding Units Implanted (Cohort 2)
A total of 12 VC-01 units were implanted in each of the Cohort 2 subjects in a single surgical procedure. Of those units, 9 were VC-01 Dose Finding (DF) units. DF units are larger than sentinels and intended to remain implanted during the duration of participation in the trial to assess efficacy.
The remaining 3 units implanted were the smaller VC-01 sentinel units intended for explant at various time points for analysis histologically.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Evaluation
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate Safety, Engraftment, and Efficacy of VC-01 in Subjects With T1 Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
n=17 Participants
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to ten (10) VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
Dose-finding Units (Aka Cohort 2)
n=14 Participants
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to twelve units implanted of which up to nine (9) are VC-01-DF (dose-finding) implants and the rest are VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
Total
n=31 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.11 • n=5 Participants
|
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.53 • n=7 Participants
|
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
24.98 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.992 • n=5 Participants
|
27.28 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.807 • n=7 Participants
|
26.00 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.09 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of Type 1 Diabetes
|
19.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.08 • n=5 Participants
|
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24 • n=7 Participants
|
22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 26Population: For each timepoint, explanted sentinel units containing PEC-01 cells from the 17 subjects were stained and evaluated for graft cell survival (i.e., viability). Not all subjects had units explanted at every timepoint, and units explanted that had "de minimus" graft cell survival (i.e., minimal, \< 500 cells, \< 4% of pre-clinical controls) could not be evaluated and were not included in the summary table.
Through histology, the potential for functional engraftment of VC-01 combination product could be assessed in Cohort 1 subjects. Explanted sentinel units from subjects were processed and stained for markers identifying the number of graft cell nuclei (i.e., signifying the cells were viable). The percentage of viable graft cells in these explanted units were then compared to the percentage of viable graft cells from the pre-clinical (i.e., animal) models. These pre-clinical models are based on animal studies performed at ViaCyte (ref: internal study report). The data in Outcome Measure Data Table represent the % of viable graft cells present in the explanted sentinels compared to what was expected based on the animal model at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 26 (e.g., At Week 4, there was an average of 18.27% viable graft cells in the participant's explants compared to what was expected based on the animal models).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
n=81 VC01 sentinels (contains PEC-01 cells)
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to ten (10) VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
|---|---|
|
Cohort 1: The Percentage of Graft Cells Present at Post-implant Time Points Relative to Pre-clinical Models
Week 4
|
18.27 %cells in sentinels rel to animal models
Standard Deviation 13.94
|
|
Cohort 1: The Percentage of Graft Cells Present at Post-implant Time Points Relative to Pre-clinical Models
Week 8
|
6.23 %cells in sentinels rel to animal models
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
|
Cohort 1: The Percentage of Graft Cells Present at Post-implant Time Points Relative to Pre-clinical Models
Week 12
|
7.58 %cells in sentinels rel to animal models
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
|
Cohort 1: The Percentage of Graft Cells Present at Post-implant Time Points Relative to Pre-clinical Models
Week 26
|
8.02 %cells in sentinels rel to animal models
Standard Deviation 8.09
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: To Week 26Population: Stimulated C-peptide data from the MMTT showed every value from baseline and Week 26 samples at all timepoints to be "undetectable" (\<0.1 ng/mL) except for one subject for whom the AUC could be calculated. Analyzing the data was deemed futile because the number of surviving graft cells was noted as insufficient for establishing the biological critical mass. The change from baseline to Week 26 in AUC for this one subject is provided below.
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of VC-01 combination product in Cohort 2 subjects was intended by measuring C-peptide levels during a 4-hour Mixed Meal Tolerance Test (MMTT). Blood glucose and C-peptide data were collected from subjects at timepoints 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 minutes after ingestion of a "meal" (i.e., BOOST drink). These C-peptide data points could be used to create the AUC calculation. If the implanted units contained mature, insulin-producing cells, stimulated C-peptide levels would be expected to increase over the time course in reaction to the meal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
n=1 Participants
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to ten (10) VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
|---|---|
|
Cohort 2: The Change in AUC (Area Under Curve) From Baseline to Week 26 in C-peptide During 4-hour MMTT
|
0.325 ng*h/mL
|
Adverse Events
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
Dose-finding Units (Aka Cohort 2)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
n=17 participants at risk
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to ten (10) VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
Dose-finding Units (Aka Cohort 2)
n=14 participants at risk
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to twelve units implanted of which up to nine (9) are VC-01-DF (dose-finding) implants and the rest are VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Vanishing Twin Syndrome
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Obstruction
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sentinel Units (Aka Cohort 1)
n=17 participants at risk
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to ten (10) VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
Dose-finding Units (Aka Cohort 2)
n=14 participants at risk
VC-01 Combination Product; Up to twelve units implanted of which up to nine (9) are VC-01-DF (dose-finding) implants and the rest are VC-01 sentinels
VC-01 Combination Product: PEC-01 cells loaded into an Encaptra Drug Delivery System
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
42.9%
6/14 • Number of events 7 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 5 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 6 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
23.5%
4/17 • Number of events 5 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Complication of Device Removal
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Implant Site Erythema
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 5 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Implant Site Hypoaesthesia
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion Site Haemorrhage
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site complication
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 6 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site erythema
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site haematoma
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site haemorrhage
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 4 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pain
|
88.2%
15/17 • Number of events 30 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
85.7%
12/14 • Number of events 60 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site pruritis
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 6 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site rash
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site swelling
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural complication
|
17.6%
3/17 • Number of events 4 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural contusion
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
50.0%
7/14 • Number of events 12 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural discomfort
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
35.7%
5/14 • Number of events 6 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural oedema
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural swelling
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 8 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural nausea
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 6 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
50.0%
7/14 • Number of events 31 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
28.6%
4/14 • Number of events 10 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension headache
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
11.8%
2/17 • Number of events 2 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/17 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Number of events 3 • Cohort 1 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 7 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 6 months). Cohort 2 subjects reported adverse events over approximately 13 months (e.g., subjects implanted/treated for 12 months).
AE/SAE Definitions used are the same as the ClinicalTrials.gov definitions. Systematic Assessment of AE Collection was used (e.g., regular investigator assessment was required at each study visit per protocol). In addition, routine monitoring visits to the site provided 100% source document verification of the AE Collection.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place