Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results

NCT ID: NCT04678141

Last Updated: 2022-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

145 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-23

Study Completion Date

2020-08-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It was aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of resin-hybrid composite and compomer materials in primary molars over a 2-year period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All treatment stages were performed by the same experienced pediatric dentist (E.O.) to avoid behavioral problems. When necessary, topical anesthesia with 2% Xylocaine® DENTAL was administered, followed by local anesthesia with epinephrine 1: 100.000 (lidocaine HCl and Epinephrine Injection, DENTSPLY Pharmaceutical, USA). Access to proximal surfaces was provided with high-speed diamond bur (FD.D.801, Frank Dental, Germany) under an air-water coolant. The proximal cavity was opened at the occlusal level. Soft carious dentine was removed with a round low-speed steel bur (SS.1A, Frank Dental, Germany).

Restorations were placed under isolation with cotton rolls and a saliva ejector. The Ca(OH)2 cavity liner material (Hydrocal LC, Medicept Dental, India) was used as base material if the distance from the pulp was not safe. A metal matrix band (Matrix band, Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany) was applied to the tooth with a universal matrix system (Tofflemire, Hahnenkratt, Königsbach-Stein, Germany) and wooden wedges (TDV, No 1). ClearfilTM SE Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc, Okayama, Japan) was applied to the cavity according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the polymerization, an LED curing light (Eliapar Freelight, 3M ESPE Dental Products, America) was used with a light power density of 600 mW/cm2. According to the manufacturer's instructions, A2 composite resin (Kerr Herculite Classic) and two different compomer materials (Dyract/XP and R\&D Series NOVA) were applied to the teeth with the incremental technique, and each increment was light-polymerized for 20 sec with an LED curing light.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Composite and compomer materials

Children aged 5-6 years with at least two carious proximal surface primary molars

Group Type OTHER

Dyract XP (Dentsply De Trey), Kerr Herculite Classic (Kerr Corporation),R&D Series NOVA(Kuraray Medical Inc) Clearfil TM SE Bond (Kuraray Medical),Hydrocal LC (Medicept Dental)

Intervention Type OTHER

compomer (Dyract XP,R\&D Series NOVA) , composite (Kerr Herculite Classic),Bonding (Clearfil TM SE Bond), Dycall (Hydrocal LC)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dyract XP (Dentsply De Trey), Kerr Herculite Classic (Kerr Corporation),R&D Series NOVA(Kuraray Medical Inc) Clearfil TM SE Bond (Kuraray Medical),Hydrocal LC (Medicept Dental)

compomer (Dyract XP,R\&D Series NOVA) , composite (Kerr Herculite Classic),Bonding (Clearfil TM SE Bond), Dycall (Hydrocal LC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\* Mentally and physically healthy

Exclusion Criteria

\* Systemic disease or medical complications
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suleyman Demirel University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Esra Oz

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Esra Oz, Assist Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Suleyman Demirel University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Dentistry Pediatric Dentistry Department

Isparta, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tseveenjav B, Furuholm J, Mulic A, Valen H, Maisala T, Turunen S, Varsio S, Auero M, Tjaderhane L. Survival of extensive restorations in primary molars: 15-year practice-based study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):249-256. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12348. Epub 2017 Dec 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29205613 (View on PubMed)

Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, Correa MB. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):123-139. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12346. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29322626 (View on PubMed)

Fuks AB. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry: new insights and reappraising the tradition. Pediatr Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;37(2):125-32.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25905653 (View on PubMed)

Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;22(6):479-85.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11132507 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

72867572.050.01.04-207321

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements
NCT04694690 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Clinical Comparison of Restorative Materials
NCT06637605 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING