Ultrasound-assisted vs Landmark Based Intrathecal Administration of Nusinersen

NCT ID: NCT04674618

Last Updated: 2024-02-21

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 58 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-12-14
• Study Completion Date: 2023-12-21

Brief Summary

Intrathecal administration of Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide capable of increasing Survival Motor Neuron protein production, has been tested in Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) to improve motor function and survival. A feature of adult SMA patients is a progressive neuromyopathic scoliosis, so spinal nusinersen administration can be challenging. Landmark identification using a pre-procedure ultrasound (US) facilitates technical performance of spinal anesthesia and allows for the elimination of radiation exposure.

The aim of this randomized prospectic study is to determine if the US assistance for spinal administration of nusinersen is able to increase the proportion at successful 1st needle insertion of the needle. Secondary outcome measures are procedure time, patient satisfaction and prevalence of postdural puncture headache.

Patients will be randomlized to receive a US-assisted nusinersen administration or a landmark based nusinersen administration.

Detailed Description

Background Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) capable of increasing SMN protein production, has been used in clinical trials in infants and children with SMA type 1 or type 2 and has been associated to a significantly better motor development, motor function, and survival compared with placebo groups. Because of the lacking ability of ASOs to cross the blood-brain barrier, nusinersen is administered intrathecally. While most infants with SMA type 1 die in easy childhood without a muscular and nutritional support, SMA type 2 patients often reach adulthood, and patients with SMA type 3 generally have a normal lifespan. A further feature of SMA patients is a progressive neuromyopathic scoliosis, so spinal nusinersen administration can be challenging because of poorly palpable surface landmarks, as in elderly and in obese patients. In patients with anticipated difficult anatomy, the failure rate of neuraxial anesthesia may be as high as 17%. Furthermore, multiple needle punctures are associated with hematoma, post-dural-puncture headache, back pain, and patient dissatisfaction. Current data suggest that landmark identification using a pre-procedure ultrasound (US) is a useful adjunct to neuraxial anesthesia that facilitates technical performance in obstetric and pediatric patients. In adult patients with difficult spinal anatomy a pre-procedure US reduces the number of attempts and the number of needle passes necessary for successful spinal anesthesia and can predict technical difficulty; notably, compared to fluoroscopy, sonography allows for the elimination of radiation exposure for patient and physician and for a cost reduction for institution. Despite these potential advantages, reports of lumbar central neuraxial blocks US guidance in patients with predicted placement difficulties are limited. Most reports to date involve a small number of patients with normal anatomy.

Methods The study will be conducted in Fondazione Policlinico "A.Gemelli" operatory rooms, Rome, Italy. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients enrolled in the study. SMA adult patients referring to NEMO center of this institution will be enrolled. Exclusion criteria will be: coagulation defects, patients medicated with anticoagulation, any finding of infection in puncture site, high intracranial pressure. A visit will be performed before the procedure.

Patients will be randomly assigned in ratio 1:1 to one of two groups using a sealed envelope: Group 1 (US-assisted nusinersen administration) and Group 2 (landmark based nusinersen administration). Nusinersen administration will be performed with a single-operator technique by one of two anesthesiologists trained on US-guided or -assisted central neuraxial blocks. With patient in sitting position, or in lateral position if forced posture will be needed, after skin disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine in 70% alcohol, the spinal administration will be performed as follows: Group 1 (US- guided nusinersen administration). The paramedian sagittal oblique view will be used to identify specific lumbar interspaces and perform the procedure. Starting at the sacrum and moving cephalad, the L2-3 or L3-4 intervertebral interspace will be identified. After local anesthesia with lidocaine 2% (3-5 mL), a 25-gauge Withacre spinal needle will be used to identify subarachnoid space. After confirmation of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and after removing 5 ml of CSF, nusinersen will be administered intrathecally over 1-3 min. Group 2 (landmark based nusinersen administration).

The desired intervertebral space (L2-3 or L3-4) was first identified by manual palpation of surface landmarks and marked on the skin. After local anesthesia with lidocaine 2% (3-5 mL) a 25-gauge Withacre spinal needle will be used. After confirmation of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and after removing 5 ml of CSF, nusinersen will be administered as previously described. After successful administration, patients will be positioned in the supine position for 2-3 h. Within 72 hours of administration a phone survey will be conducted to evaluate the development of postdural puncture headache. Another outpatient visit will be performed at 30 days after the procedure.

Conditions

Muscular Atrophy, Spinal; Ultrasound

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

US-assisted nusinersen administration

A paramedian sagittal oblique view will be used to identify with ultrasound specific lumbar interspaces. After local anesthesia the spinal needle will be used to identify subarachnoid space. After confirmation of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and after removing 5 ml of CSF, nusinersen will be administered intrathecally over 1-3 min.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

US-assisted nusinersen administration

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Ultrasound identification of intervertebral space (L2-L3 or L3-L4)

landmark based nusinersen administration

The desired intervertebral space will be first identified by manual palpation of surface landmarks and marked on the skin. After local anesthesia the spinal needle will be usedto identify subarachnoid space. After confirmation of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid and after removing 5 ml of CSF, nusinersen will be administered intrathecally over 1-3 min.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

US-assisted nusinersen administration

Ultrasound identification of intervertebral space (L2-L3 or L3-L4)

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• SMA adult patients

Exclusion Criteria

• coagulation defects;
• medication with anticoagulant;
• infection in puncture site;
• high intracranial pressure

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

IRCCS Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

Rome, , Italy

Countries

Italy

References

Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, Chiriboga CA, Saito K, Servais L, Tizzano E, Topaloglu H, Tulinius M, Montes J, Glanzman AM, Bishop K, Zhong ZJ, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Schneider E, Farwell W, De Vivo DC; ENDEAR Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1723-1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29091570 (View on PubMed)

Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM, Iannaccone ST, Kirschner J, Kuntz NL, Saito K, Shieh PB, Tulinius M, Mazzone ES, Montes J, Bishop KM, Yang Q, Foster R, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Farwell W, Schneider E, De Vivo DC, Finkel RS; CHERISH Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 15;378(7):625-635. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710504.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29443664 (View on PubMed)

Geary RS, Yu RZ, Levin AA. Pharmacokinetics of phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2001 Apr;2(4):562-73.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11566019 (View on PubMed)

Zerres K, Rudnik-Schoneborn S, Forrest E, Lusakowska A, Borkowska J, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. A collaborative study on the natural history of childhood and juvenile onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy (type II and III SMA): 569 patients. J Neurol Sci. 1997 Feb 27;146(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00284-5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9077498 (View on PubMed)

Oskoui M, Levy G, Garland CJ, Gray JM, O'Hagen J, De Vivo DC, Kaufmann P. The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy type 1. Neurology. 2007 Nov 13;69(20):1931-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000290830.40544.b9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17998484 (View on PubMed)

Kim JH, Song SY, Kim BJ. Predicting the difficulty in performing a neuraxial blockade. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011 Nov;61(5):377-81. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2011.61.5.377. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22148085 (View on PubMed)

Fettes PD, Jansson JR, Wildsmith JA. Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):739-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep096. Epub 2009 May 6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19420004 (View on PubMed)

Sahin T, Balaban O, Sahin L, Solak M, Toker K. A randomized controlled trial of preinsertion ultrasound guidance for spinal anaesthesia in pregnancy: outcomes among obese and lean parturients: ultrasound for spinal anesthesia in pregnancy. J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1726-1. Epub 2013 Oct 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24141882 (View on PubMed)

Scapinelli R. Morphological and functional changes of the lumbar spinous processes in the elderly. Surg Radiol Anat. 1989;11(2):129-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02096469.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 2763004 (View on PubMed)

Angle P, Tang SL, Thompson D, Szalai JP. Expectant management of postdural puncture headache increases hospital length of stay and emergency room visits. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Apr;52(4):397-402. doi: 10.1007/BF03016283.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15814755 (View on PubMed)

Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia AT. An observational prospective cohort study of incidence and characteristics of failed spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Jul;18(3):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.01.010. Epub 2009 May 17.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19450971 (View on PubMed)

Horlocker TT, McGregor DG, Matsushige DK, Schroeder DR, Besse JA. A retrospective review of 4767 consecutive spinal anesthetics: central nervous system complications. Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg. 1997 Mar;84(3):578-84. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199703000-00021.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 9052305 (View on PubMed)

Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N. Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Oct;19(4):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20696564 (View on PubMed)

Grau T, Leipold RW, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Efficacy of ultrasound imaging in obstetric epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2002 May;14(3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00378-6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12031746 (View on PubMed)

Grau T, Leipold RW, Fatehi S, Martin E, Motsch J. Real-time ultrasonic observation of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jan;21(1):25-31. doi: 10.1017/s026502150400105x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14768920 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan V, Brown-Shreves D, Koshkin A, Vaishnav V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8ad4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21572316 (View on PubMed)

Willschke H, Bosenberg A, Marhofer P, Willschke J, Schwindt J, Weintraud M, Kapral S, Kettner S. Epidural catheter placement in neonates: sonoanatomy and feasibility of ultrasonographic guidance in term and preterm neonates. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.008.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17196490 (View on PubMed)

Kallidaikurichi Srinivasan K, Iohom G, Loughnane F, Lee PJ. Conventional Landmark-Guided Midline Versus Preprocedure Ultrasound-Guided Paramedian Techniques in Spinal Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):1089-1096. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000911.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26270115 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Ramlogan R, Arzola C, Singh M, Chan V. The utility of ultrasound imaging in predicting ease of performance of spinal anesthesia in an orthopedic patient population. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):34-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182734927.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23143015 (View on PubMed)

Lee PJ, Tang R, Sawka A, Krebs C, Vaghadia H. Brief report: real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia using Taylor's approach. Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1236-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820ec53c. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21372276 (View on PubMed)

Karmakar MK, Li X, Ho AM, Kwok WH, Chui PT. Real-time ultrasound-guided paramedian epidural access: evaluation of a novel in-plane technique. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):845-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep079. Epub 2009 Apr 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19398454 (View on PubMed)

Conroy PH, Luyet C, McCartney CJ, McHardy PG. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational study of a new approach. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:525818. doi: 10.1155/2013/525818. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23365568 (View on PubMed)

Weed J, Finkel K, Beach ML, Granger CB, Gallagher JD, Sites BD. Spinal anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: a detailed video assessment of quality. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):51-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182030863.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21455090 (View on PubMed)

Tran D, Kamani AA, Al-Attas E, Lessoway VA, Massey S, Rohling RN. Single-operator real-time ultrasound-guidance to aim and insert a lumbar epidural needle. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;57(4):313-21. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9252-1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20196236 (View on PubMed)

Atallah MM, Demian AD, Shorrab AA. Development of a difficulty score for spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004 Mar;92(3):354-60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh073. Epub 2004 Jan 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14742333 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

3352

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id