PTCy and Ruxolitinib vs PTCy, Tacrolimus and MMF in MUD and Haploidentical HSCT

NCT ID: NCT04669210

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-03

Study Completion Date

2025-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is multicenter investigator-initiated randomized open-label phase II clinical trial to compare prophylaxis of graft versus host disease treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus ruxolitinib after post-transplant cyclophosphamide.

In total 128 patients will be included in the study. After inclusion into the study and performing of transplantation patients will be randomized in 1:1 proportion in two arms (64 patients per arm): arm A will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide and ruxolitinib for GVHD prophylaxis; arm B will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. After the end of the treatment patients will be followed-up during two years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Graft-versus-host-disease Stem Cell Transplant Complications Acute Myeloid Leukemia Acute Lymphoid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PTCY tacrolimus MMF

Conditioning:

fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os

GVHD prophylaxis:

cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg from day+5 to 100 mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day+5 to 35

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg adjusted to concentrations 5-15 ng/ml from day+5 to +100

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

Mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day +5 to +35

PTCY ruxolitinib

Conditioning:

fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days -7 to -2

GVHD prophylaxis:

cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days +5 to +21 ruxolitinib 5 mg bid days +22 to +150

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ruxolitinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Ruxolitinib administered during conditioning 5 mg tid before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 5 mg tid days 5-21 and 5 mg bid days 22-150 after transplantation instead of tacrolimus and MMF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib administered during conditioning 5 mg tid before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 5 mg tid days 5-21 and 5 mg bid days 22-150 after transplantation instead of tacrolimus and MMF.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg adjusted to concentrations 5-15 ng/ml from day+5 to +100

Intervention Type DRUG

Mycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day +5 to +35

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Jakavi Prograf CellCept

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Informed consent to participate in the study, signed by the patient;
2. Diagnosis: acute lymphoblastic or acute myeloblastic leukemia;
3. Morphological remission, defined as less than 5% of blasts by microscopy or flow cytometry with a peripheral leukocyte level of more than 1.500 μL. It is acceptable to include patients without restored platelets or erythrocytes;
4. Indications for performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, determined by the participating center in accordance with local medical practice;
5. Unrelated or haploidentical donor;
6. Age 18-70 years;
7. Functional status according to ECOG scale 0-2 score.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Repeated allogeneic transplantation, regardless of the indications for its implementation;
2. Source of graft - umbilical cord stem cells;
3. Any ex vivo modification of the graft with the exception of separation or washing of red blood cells;
4. The presence of more than 5% of clonal tumor cells according to flow cytometry in the presence of morphological remission;
5. Diagnosis: acute promyelocytic leukemia;
6. Severe organ failure: creatinine more than 2 ULN; ALT, AST more than 5 ULN; bilirubin more than 1.5 ULN; respiratory failure more than 1 grade;
7. Unstable hemodynamics, requiring the introduction of vasopressors;
8. Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of randomization, determined by the level of CRP\> 70 mg/l with adequate antibacterial or antifungal therapy;
9. Rhythm disturbances that persist despite adequate antiarrhythmic therapy: a tachysystolic form of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias V gradation according to Laun, AV block of III degree;
10. Decrease in ejection fraction according to echocardiography less than 40%;
11. Angina of more than II functional class or unstable angina;
12. Another severe concomitant pathology, which according to the attending physician does not allow the patient to be included in the study;
13. Pulmonary pathology with a decrease in FEV1 of less than 60% or pulmonary diffusion capacity of less than 60%;
14. Inability to quit smoking for up to 6 months after transplantation;
15. Pregnancy or refusal to perform highly effective contraception for 6 months after transplantation.

Highly effective contraceptive methods include:
* Total abstinence: if it corresponds to the preferred and customary way of life of the patient. Periodic abstinence (for example, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation methods) and interrupted sexual intercourse are not considered acceptable methods of contraception;
* Female sterilization (surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before the start of the therapy being studied. In the case of ovariectomy only, the reproductive status of the woman must be confirmed using a subsequent analysis of hormones;
* Sterilization of the male partner (at least 6 months before screening). For women participating in the study, the sexual partner after a vasectomy should be the only partner;
* Use of oral, injectable or implanted hormonal contraceptive drugs, intrauterine devices or contraceptive systems, or other forms of hormonal contraception with similar efficacy (failure rate less than 1%), for example, hormonal vaginal rings or transdermal hormonal contraceptives.
16. Somatic or mental pathology not allowing to sign informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ivan S Moiseev

RM Gorbacheva Research institute scientific director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Hematology Research Center

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

RM Gorbacheva Research Institute

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CINC424ARU01T

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PTCy and ATG for MSD and MUD Transplants
NCT06299462 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
MAGIC Ruxolitinib for aGVHD
NCT06936566 RECRUITING PHASE2