Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Multicenter Study to Assess Response to Influenza Vaccine in Multiple Sclerosis Participants Treated With Ofatumumab (NCT NCT04667117)
NCT ID: NCT04667117
Last Updated: 2024-10-09
Results Overview
A seroprotection responder was a participant achieving seroprotection as defined by a post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer ≥ 40 at Week 4. Seroprotection against ten influenza strains was analyzed. The analysis was performed taking into consideration observed data.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
63 participants
Week 4
2024-10-09
Participant Flow
This study was conducted in 3 sites in the United States.
Participants underwent a screening period of up to 1 week. After screening there was a 4-week investigational period and an optional 6-month open-label extension period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigational Period
STARTED
|
22
|
22
|
19
|
|
Investigational Period
COMPLETED
|
22
|
21
|
18
|
|
Investigational Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Extension Period
STARTED
|
22
|
11
|
0
|
|
Extension Period
COMPLETED
|
21
|
11
|
0
|
|
Extension Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigational Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Investigational Period
Protocol Deviation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Extension Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Multicenter Study to Assess Response to Influenza Vaccine in Multiple Sclerosis Participants Treated With Ofatumumab
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
Total
n=63 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88 • n=5 Participants
|
38.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.03 • n=7 Participants
|
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.12 • n=5 Participants
|
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.50 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: Participants in the Safety Set with an available value for the outcome measure. Safety Set included all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug. For each influenza strain, the number of participants analyzed corresponds to the participants with both pre-vaccination and post-vaccination HI titers for the corresponding strain.
A seroprotection responder was a participant achieving seroprotection as defined by a post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer ≥ 40 at Week 4. Seroprotection against ten influenza strains was analyzed. The analysis was performed taking into consideration observed data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=18 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=17 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Brisbane
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.81 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Cambodia
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 75.29 to 100.0
|
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 28.36 to 99.49
|
85.71 percentage of participants
Interval 42.13 to 99.64
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Kansas
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.81 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Michigan
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.81 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Singapore
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.81 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Victoria
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 75.29 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 59.04 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Wisconsin
|
61.54 percentage of participants
Interval 31.58 to 86.14
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 19.12 to 63.95
|
68.75 percentage of participants
Interval 41.34 to 88.98
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Colorado
|
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 14.66 to 94.73
|
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 1.26 to 98.74
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Phuket
|
77.78 percentage of participants
Interval 52.36 to 93.59
|
68.18 percentage of participants
Interval 45.13 to 86.14
|
76.47 percentage of participants
Interval 50.1 to 93.19
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Washington
|
76.92 percentage of participants
Interval 46.19 to 94.96
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
71.43 percentage of participants
Interval 29.04 to 96.33
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4Population: Safety Set including all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug. For each influenza strain, the number of participants analyzed corresponds to the participants with pre-vaccination HI titers for the corresponding strain.
A seroprotection responder was a participant achieving seroprotection as defined by a post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer ≥ 40 at Week 4. Seroprotection against ten influenza strains was analyzed. Non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data was applied.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Brisbane
|
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 86.3
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 99.16
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Cambodia
|
86.67 percentage of participants
Interval 59.54 to 98.34
|
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 28.36 to 99.49
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 29.93 to 92.51
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Kansas
|
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 86.3
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 99.16
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Michigan
|
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 86.3
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 99.16
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Singapore
|
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 86.3
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 9.43 to 99.16
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Victoria
|
86.67 percentage of participants
Interval 59.54 to 98.34
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 47.82 to 100.0
|
77.78 percentage of participants
Interval 39.99 to 97.19
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Wisconsin
|
53.33 percentage of participants
Interval 26.59 to 78.73
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 19.12 to 63.95
|
61.11 percentage of participants
Interval 35.75 to 82.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Colorado
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 0.84 to 90.57
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Phuket
|
63.64 percentage of participants
Interval 40.66 to 82.8
|
68.18 percentage of participants
Interval 45.13 to 86.14
|
68.42 percentage of participants
Interval 43.45 to 87.42
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroprotection at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Washington
|
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 38.38 to 88.18
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 86.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-vaccination), Week 4Population: Participants in the Safety Set with an available value for the outcome measure. Safety Set included all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug. For each influenza strain, the number of participants analyzed corresponds to the participants with both pre-vaccination and post-vaccination HI titers for the corresponding strain.
Seroconversion was defined as: • a ≥ 4-fold increase in HI titers after vaccination (in participants with pre-vaccination HI titers ≥ 10) OR • post-vaccination HI titers ≥ 40 (in participants with pre-vaccination HI titers \< 10) Seroconversion against ten influenza strains was analyzed. The analysis was performed taking into consideration observed data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=18 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=17 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Brisbane
|
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 28.36 to 99.49
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.19
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Cambodia
|
84.62 percentage of participants
Interval 54.55 to 98.08
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
42.86 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 81.59
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Kansas
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 5.27 to 85.34
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.19
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Michigan
|
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 14.66 to 94.73
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.19
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Singapore
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 5.27 to 85.34
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.19
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Victoria
|
92.31 percentage of participants
Interval 63.97 to 99.81
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
42.86 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 81.59
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza A Wisconsin
|
46.15 percentage of participants
Interval 19.22 to 74.87
|
10.00 percentage of participants
Interval 1.23 to 31.7
|
37.50 percentage of participants
Interval 15.2 to 64.57
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Colorado
|
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 14.66 to 94.73
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 84.19
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Phuket
|
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 26.02 to 73.98
|
18.18 percentage of participants
Interval 5.19 to 40.28
|
41.18 percentage of participants
Interval 18.44 to 67.08
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Observed Case)
Influenza B Washington
|
38.46 percentage of participants
Interval 13.86 to 68.42
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 52.18
|
42.86 percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 81.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-vaccination), Week 4Population: Safety Set including all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug. For each influenza strain, the number of participants analyzed corresponds to the participants with pre-vaccination HI titers for the corresponding strain.
Seroconversion was defined as: • a ≥ 4-fold increase in HI titers after vaccination (in participants with pre-vaccination HI titers ≥ 10) OR • post-vaccination HI titers ≥ 40 (in participants with pre-vaccination HI titers \< 10) Seroconversion against ten influenza strains was analyzed. Non-responder imputation (NRI) for missing data was applied.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Brisbane
|
44.44 percentage of participants
Interval 13.7 to 78.8
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.76
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Cambodia
|
73.33 percentage of participants
Interval 44.9 to 92.21
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Kansas
|
22.22 percentage of participants
Interval 2.81 to 60.01
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.76
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Michigan
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.76
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Singapore
|
22.22 percentage of participants
Interval 2.81 to 60.01
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.76
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Victoria
|
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 51.91 to 95.67
|
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.51 to 71.64
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza A Wisconsin
|
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 16.34 to 67.71
|
10.00 percentage of participants
Interval 1.23 to 31.7
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 13.34 to 59.01
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Colorado
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 70.76
|
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.5 to 100.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Phuket
|
40.91 percentage of participants
Interval 20.71 to 63.65
|
18.18 percentage of participants
Interval 5.19 to 40.28
|
36.84 percentage of participants
Interval 16.29 to 61.64
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Seroconversion at Week 4 (Non-responder Imputation)
Influenza B Washington
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 11.82 to 61.62
|
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 52.18
|
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 7.49 to 70.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-vaccination), Week 4Population: Participants in the Safety Set with an available value for the outcome measure. Safety Set included all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug. For each influenza strain, the number of participants analyzed corresponds to the participants with both pre-vaccination and post-vaccination HI titers for the corresponding strain.
Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers were measured in serum samples pre-vaccination (baseline) and post-vaccination (Week 4). The geometric mean of the ratio of post-vaccination to pre-vaccination HI titer was calculated to estimate the average fold change in HI titer after vaccination compared to before vaccination.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=18 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=17 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Brisbane
|
5.3 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 2.3 to 12.3
|
1.4 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.0 to 115.6
|
2.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Cambodia
|
9.4 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 4.2 to 21.0
|
1.4 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.4 to 5.5
|
2.9 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.1 to 7.7
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Kansas
|
2.6 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.0 to 7.0
|
1.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
In instances where SD=0 (because all values were the same), the confidence interval for the geometric mean was not calculated as the limits of the confidence interval are exactly the same as the geometric mean.
|
2.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Michigan
|
5.5 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.1 to 26.8
|
0.9 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.1 to 5.4
|
4.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Singapore
|
4.3 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.9 to 20.6
|
1.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
In instances where SD=0 (because all values were the same), the confidence interval for the geometric mean was not calculated as the limits of the confidence interval are exactly the same as the geometric mean.
|
2.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Victoria
|
8.6 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 4.3 to 17.3
|
1.3 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.5 to 3.5
|
3.6 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.2 to 11.3
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza A Wisconsin
|
4.9 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 2.0 to 12.0
|
1.7 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
2.6 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.2 to 5.4
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza B Colorado
|
3.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.1 to 8.1
|
1.4 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.0 to 115.6
|
4.0 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza B Phuket
|
3.8 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 2.5 to 5.7
|
1.3 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.9 to 1.9
|
2.2 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.0 to 4.6
|
|
Fold Change From Baseline in Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers
Influenza B Washington
|
3.5 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.7 to 7.3
|
0.9 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 0.6 to 1.3
|
2.8 Ratio to baseline in HI titer
Interval 1.3 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)Population: Safety Set including all participants who had received inactivated influenza vaccine and at last 1 dose of study drug.
Number of participants with adverse events (any AEs regardless of seriousness), AEs leading to study drug discontinuation and serious adverse events (SAEs). On-study AEs are defined as AEs which started or worsened on or after the date of the visit at Week 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 Participants
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
16 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs leading to study drug discontinuation
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1
Cohort 2
Cohort 3
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Multiple sclerosis pseudo relapse
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=22 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine two weeks prior to ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 2
n=22 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing MS receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine at least 4 weeks after ofatumumab start
|
Cohort 3
n=19 participants at risk
Patients with relapsing MS currently on iDMT receiving a 2020-2021, 2021-2022, or 2022-2023 inactivated influenza vaccine
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal mass
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
13.6%
3/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Injury associated with device
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
13.6%
3/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
5.3%
1/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
5.3%
1/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injection related reaction
|
18.2%
4/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Polydipsia
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
9.1%
2/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.6%
3/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
5.3%
1/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
5.3%
1/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Generalised anxiety disorder
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin wrinkling
|
0.00%
0/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
4.5%
1/22 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
0.00%
0/19 • From Week 0 to Week 26 (Cohort 1), Week 28 (Cohort 2) and Week 4 (Cohort 3)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER