Promoting Healing of Nerves Through Electrical Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT04662320
Last Updated: 2024-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Brief Electrical Stimulation
Single, 10 minute dose of electrical stimulation delivered to the ulnar nerve during surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression.
Checkpoint BEST System
Single use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair.
Other Name: Checkpoint BEST System
Standard of Care
Surgical intervention for cubital tunnel decompression.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Checkpoint BEST System
Single use medical device, consisting of electric stimulator and intraoperative lead. Therapy consists of single, 10 minute dose delivered proximal to site of decompression/repair.
Other Name: Checkpoint BEST System
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Are candidates for surgical intervention.
* Evidence of motor involvement such as intrinsic muscle atrophy or weakness.
* Are age 18-80 years.
* Signed and dated informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous history or current transection of ulnar nerve, or concomitant upper extremity nerve injury
* Global peripheral neuropathy affecting the hands
* Age less than 18 or greater than 80 years
* Un-affected hand maximum grip strength \<12kg
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
FED
Checkpoint Surgical Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amy M Moore, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Ohio State Univeristy Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
The Ohio State Univeristy - Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin - Hand Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Saffari TM, Walker ER, Pet MA, Moore AM. Brief Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Nerve Regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):e5730. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005730. eCollection 2024 Apr. No abstract available.
Power HA, Morhart MJ, Olson JL, Chan KM. Postsurgical Electrical Stimulation Enhances Recovery Following Surgery for Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):769-777. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz322.
Gordon T, Amirjani N, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Brief post-surgical electrical stimulation accelerates axon regeneration and muscle reinnervation without affecting the functional measures in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Exp Neurol. 2010 May;223(1):192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.09.020. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
Jo S, Pan D, Halevi AE, Roh J, Schellhardt L, Hunter Ra DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Moore AM, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Comparing electrical stimulation and tacrolimus (FK506) to enhance treating nerve injuries. Muscle Nerve. 2019 Nov;60(5):629-636. doi: 10.1002/mus.26659. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Evans A, Padovano WM, Patterson JMM, Wood MD, Fongsri W, Kennedy CR, Mackinnon SE. Beyond the Cubital Tunnel: Use of Adjunctive Procedures in the Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):203-213. doi: 10.1177/1558944721998022. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
Sayanagi J, Acevedo-Cintron JA, Pan D, Schellhardt L, Hunter DA, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Brief Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Promotes Recovery Following Nerve Transection and Repair in Mice. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Oct 20;103(20):e80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01965.
Roh J, Schellhardt L, Keane GC, Hunter DA, Moore AM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Mackinnon SE, Wood MD. Short-Duration, Pulsatile, Electrical Stimulation Therapy Accelerates Axon Regeneration and Recovery following Tibial Nerve Injury and Repair in Rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;149(4):681e-690e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008924.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
W81XWH1920065
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
0153-CSP-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id