Augmenting the Effects of Mirror Therapy for Stroke Rehabilitation by tDCS

NCT ID: NCT04655209

Last Updated: 2021-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-04

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project is to evaluate and compare the impact of tDCS stimulation location on augmenting MT effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mirror therapy (MT) has emerged as an effective treatment approach for stroke rehabilitation. To augment the effects of MT, one appealing approach is to combine MT with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to promote neuroplasticity. However, it remains undetermined as to how tDCS may be effectively and efficiently applied in conjunction with MT. The long term goal of this project will be to identify the optimal combination approach of MT and tDCS to enhance recovery after stroke. The stimulation timing and location of tDCS in relation to MT will be varied, and the scientific evidence will be built upon by the evaluation of comprehensive outcome measures. This project will also investigate the possible electroencephalography (EEG) physiological and motor control mechanisms, and study predictors of treatment success to identify the appropriate patient population for the hybrid regimen.

Specifically, the first aim of this project is to evaluate and compare the impact of tDCS stimulation location on augmenting MT effects. The tDCS will be applied either before or concurrently with MT, and will be applied either over primary motor cortex (M1) or premotor cortex (PMC). Outcome measures will include behavioral performances selected based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework, EEG physiological measures, and kinematic control of upper extremity (UE) movements. All the outcome measures will be assessed before and immediately after the intervention, and only behavioral performances will be evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Investigators hypothesize that immediately after intervention, the participants who receive MT combined with tDCS will demonstrate greater improvements in the outcomes than those who receive MT with sham tDCS. Investigators also hypothesize that the stimulation location of tDCS will induce differential therapeutic effects on the outcome measures.

The second aim of this study is to examine the retention performance of the behavioral outcomes at 3-and 6-month follow-up. Investigators hypothesize that the beneficial effects of the hybrid therapy will be retained 3 and 6 months post intervention.

The third aim of this study is to perform subsequent analysis of exploring whether patients with primary motor cortex involved will respond to various types of treatment differently from those without primary motor cortex involved.

The fourth aim of the study is to identify the characteristics of responders for the hybrid therapy. The possible predictors of post treatment changes in behavioral (the aspects of activities and participation), EEG physiological, and kinematic measures will be determined. Investigators hypothesize that the behavioral (the aspect of motor impairment), the EEG physiological and the kinematic measures will be good predictors for the treatment outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebrovascular Accident

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

M1-Seq group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

apply a-tDCS on the ipsilesional M1 followed by MT (M1-Seq)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The participants in the M1-Seq group will first receive a-tDCS over ipsi-lesional M1 without any active arm practice for 20 minutes. For the next 20 minutes, the participants will start the MT, while the electrodes will be remained on the scalp with the stimulator off (sham tDCS condition). Then the electrodes will be removed, and the participants will receive additional 20 minutes of MT without tDCS followed by 30 minutes of functional task practice.

PMC-Seq group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

apply a-tDCS on the ipsilesional PMC followed by MT (PMC-Seq)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The procedures for the PMC-Seq group will be the same as the M1-Seq, except that a-tDCS will be applied on ipsilesional PMC but not M1.

MT with sham tDCS

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

MT only with sham tDCS (MT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

For the MT group, the procedure will be the same as the other groups except that sham tDCS will be used for the first 40 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

apply a-tDCS on the ipsilesional M1 followed by MT (M1-Seq)

The participants in the M1-Seq group will first receive a-tDCS over ipsi-lesional M1 without any active arm practice for 20 minutes. For the next 20 minutes, the participants will start the MT, while the electrodes will be remained on the scalp with the stimulator off (sham tDCS condition). Then the electrodes will be removed, and the participants will receive additional 20 minutes of MT without tDCS followed by 30 minutes of functional task practice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

apply a-tDCS on the ipsilesional PMC followed by MT (PMC-Seq)

The procedures for the PMC-Seq group will be the same as the M1-Seq, except that a-tDCS will be applied on ipsilesional PMC but not M1.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

MT only with sham tDCS (MT)

For the MT group, the procedure will be the same as the other groups except that sham tDCS will be used for the first 40 minutes.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. sustained an unilateral stroke with onset ≥ 6 months;
2. UE-FMA score between 18 and 56 indicating moderate to mild motor severity;
3. aged from 45 to 85 years old; and
4. able to follow instructions and perform the tasks (Mini Mental State Examination ≥ 24).

Exclusion Criteria

if they

1. have excessive spasticity or joint contracture of the paretic UE;
2. are enrolled in other rehabilitation experiments or drug studies;
3. have additional neurological or psychological disorders other than stroke;
4. have received Botulinum toxin injections 3 months before enrollment;
5. have unstable cardiovascular status such as uncontrolled hypertension or New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV heart failure;
6. have contradictions to tDCS including a history of epilepsy, migraine headache, uncontrolled medical status, being pregnant, having a pacemaker, or metal implanted in their head or body; and
7. have a history of drug or alcohol abuse, skin lesions on the electrode sites, brain tumor, brain injury, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), had brain surgery, other brain diseases (such as intracranial hypertension or cerebral edema), or being not suitable for using tDCS by the physician's assessment.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ching-Yi Wu

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chang Gung University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital

Xindian District, New Taipei City, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ching-Yi Wu, ScD

Role: CONTACT

886-3-2118800 ext. 5761

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ching-Yi Wu, ScD

Role: primary

886-3-2118800 ext. 5761

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liao WW, Lin CY, Horng YS, Chen CL, Lee TH, Wu CY. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor and premotor cortex with mirror therapy improves motor control, muscle function, and brain activity in chronic stroke: a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 26;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01635-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40287756 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201600227A0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS and Physical Therapy in Stroke
NCT00542256 COMPLETED NA