7-day Simvastatin and Emotional Processing

NCT ID: NCT04652089

Last Updated: 2022-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-03

Study Completion Date

2021-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Work in our group has revealed that short-term (7-day) administration of antidepressants produces positive biases in the processing of emotional information in healthy volunteers. Such effect might be an important neuropsychological mechanism of antidepressant action.

The current study will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg on emotional and reward processing tasks in healthy volunteers. There is evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, and it is therefore predicted that simvastatin will have positive effects on emotional and reward processing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Depression is common and associated with considerable health disability (Kassebaum-2016). Traditional antidepressants mainly work by modulating monoamine levels in the synaptic cleft (Harmer-2017); however, the evidence that depression is caused by impaired serotonin or noradrenaline activity is weak and inconsistent (Cowen-2015), and indeed current antidepressant strategies remain burdened by partial efficacy, poor side-effects profile, and a slow onset of therapeutic action (Penn-2012). Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop antidepressant medications with novel non-monoaminergic mechanisms of action (Jha-2018) - or, conversely, to identify alternative pathophysiological pathways leading to depression that can be targeted with new drugs. Intriguingly, there is growing evidence that both peripheral and central inflammation play a role in the pathophysiology of depression (Miller-2017).

Patients with depression consistently show negative biases in emotional processing, which are believed to play a key role in the aetiology and maintenance of their clinical symptoms (Roiser-2013). Overall, robust evidence suggests that early changes in emotional processing can serve as valid surrogate markers of antidepressant efficacy (Harmer-2017); for example, seven days' treatment with selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (citalopram and reboxetine respectively) compared to placebo decreases the recognition of negative facial expressions and recall of negative versus positive stimuli in healthy volunteers (Harmer-2004). Conversely, another study using the pro-inflammatory cytokine interferon-α showed that inflammatory-mediated depression can be associated with an increased recognition of negative facial expressions (Cooper-2017). Furthermore, depression associated with inflammation is characterised by significant symptoms of anhedonia (Miller-2017), which has been linked to diminished neural responses to reward anticipation (Felger-2017). Such reward-deficit is particularly refractory to conventional serotoninergic and noradrenergic antidepressants (McCabe-201), and even the antidepressant bupropion (a noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake inhibitor), whilst inducing positive changes in emotional processing, appears not to improve reward processing (Walsh-2018). However, the reversal of this deficit in reward processing is still considered as a valuable marker of target engagement for anti-inflammatory drugs in depression, as a more sensitive outcome measure than traditional rating scales designed to capture the global clinical symptomatology (Miller-2017).

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins are recommended and have been widely used since the '80s for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (NICE 2014). It is now established that these medications have significant anti-inflammatory effects that are independent from their lipid-lowering properties (Jain-2005), as well as appearing early in treatment only after seven day of administration (Macin-2011). Statins are considered extremely safe drugs: their more common side-effect are muscle pain or weakness (usually mild and quickly responding to stopping or switching medication) and elevation of liver transaminases (significant only in case of pre-existing hepatic disease), whereas more serious adverse events include rhabdomyolysis (very rare but severe myopathy associated with elevated creatine kinase and myoglobinuria), new-onset diabetes mellitus (in predisposed individual with pre-existing hyperglycaemia), and haemorrhagic stroke (in patients with prior haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct); however, clinical trials have ultimately concluded that such adverse events attributed to statin therapy in routine practice are not actually caused by it (Collins-2016). Other common (≥ 1/100, \< 1/10) but usually mild side-effects include: nasopharyngitis, pharyngo-laryngeal pain, epistaxis, headache, and gastrointestinal disturbances (constipation, diarrhoea, flatulence, dyspepsia, nausea). Importantly, a potential antidepressant effect for statins has been confirmed in animals (Kilic-2012), as well as clinically in observational (Parsaik-2014) and interventional studies (Salagre-2016). Although their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties have been proposed, the precise mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of statins remain unclear, therefore further translational studies have been advocated in order to elucidate this aspect (Köhler-Forsberg-2017).

In this exploratory study, we will investigate the effect of seven-day administration of simvastatin 20mg once daily compared to placebo on emotional and reward processing tasks in 50 healthy volunteers. In view of the previous evidence that statins may exert antidepressant effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant pathways, we predict that simvastatin will have positive effect on emotional and reward processing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression Inflammation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel Assignment Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups (simvastatin or placebo) and take the assigned medication for 7 days
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental arm: Simvastatin

Simvastatin 20mg capsule once a day for 7 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simvastatin 20mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Simvastatin 20mg once a day for 7 days

Control arm: Placebo

Placebo capsule once a day for 7 days

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo once a day for 7 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simvastatin 20mg

Simvastatin 20mg once a day for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo once a day for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female
* Aged 18-50 years
* Sufficiently fluent English to understand and complete the tasks
* Body Mass Index in the range of 18-30
* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
* Not currently taking any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)

Exclusion Criteria

* Currently any regular medications (except the contraceptive pill)
* History or current significant psychiatric illness
* Current alcohol or substance misuse disorder
* History or current significant hepatic disease
* History or current significant neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
* History of haemorrhagic stroke or lacunar infarct
* Known hyperglycaemia/pre-diabetes
* Known hypersensitivity to the study drug (i.e. simvastatin) or sucrose
* Pregnant, breast feeding, women of child-bearing potential not using appropriate contraceptive measures
* Participation in a study that uses the same or similar computer tasks as those used in the present study
* Participation in a study that involves the use of a medication within the last three months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Giorgi R, Quinton AMG, Waters S, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. An experimental medicine study of the effects of simvastatin on emotional processing, reward learning, verbal memory, and inflammation in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Aug;239(8):2635-2645. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06156-y. Epub 2022 May 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35511258 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R69606/RE001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Circadian Effects of Escitalopram
NCT01214044 COMPLETED NA
Predictors of Antidepressant Response
NCT02178696 COMPLETED PHASE4
Effect of Antidepressants on Back Pain
NCT00018200 COMPLETED PHASE2
Effort and Antidepressant Study Test
NCT06696482 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Glutamate Emotion Memory Study
NCT05809609 RECRUITING NA