Predicting Response to Naltrexone With Eye Tracking in Videogame Disorder
NCT ID: NCT04649892
Last Updated: 2020-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-31
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. Naltrexone and brief psychoeducational intervention
2. Placebo and brief psychoeducational intervention This will be double-blind controlled study.
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Naltrexone
A 12 week Naltrexone flexible dose administration plus 4 sessions of a psychoeducational intervention and 4 eye-tracking sessions
Naltrexone
Patients will receive daily doses of Naltrexone, starting at 50mg and increasing 25mg per week until reaching 200mg or the maximum tolerated by the patient
Psychoeducational
Participants will also attend to 4 sessions of psychoeducational intervention in weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Eye-tracking
The attentional bias of the participants will be assessed using the Eye-tracking device in 4 moments throughout the study:
* Before taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One hour after taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One week after continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
* At the end of the intervention, after 12 weeks of continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
Placebo
A 12 week placebo matching tablets plus 4 sessions of a psychoeducational intervention and 4 eye-tracking sessions
Placebo
Patients will receive daily doses placebo matching tablets for the 12 weeks of the study. Throughout this period, possible adverse effects will be monitored weekly.
Psychoeducational
Participants will also attend to 4 sessions of psychoeducational intervention in weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Eye-tracking
The attentional bias of the participants will be assessed using the Eye-tracking device in 4 moments throughout the study:
* Before taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One hour after taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One week after continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
* At the end of the intervention, after 12 weeks of continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Naltrexone
Patients will receive daily doses of Naltrexone, starting at 50mg and increasing 25mg per week until reaching 200mg or the maximum tolerated by the patient
Placebo
Patients will receive daily doses placebo matching tablets for the 12 weeks of the study. Throughout this period, possible adverse effects will be monitored weekly.
Psychoeducational
Participants will also attend to 4 sessions of psychoeducational intervention in weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8
Eye-tracking
The attentional bias of the participants will be assessed using the Eye-tracking device in 4 moments throughout the study:
* Before taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One hour after taking the first dose of naltrexone or placebo.
* One week after continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
* At the end of the intervention, after 12 weeks of continuous and daily use of naltrexone or placebo.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients diagnosed with Internet Gaming Disorder according to DSM-5
* Patients who have a score of 4 or higher on the following questions on the IGDS9-SF scale (Internet Gaming Disorder Scale 9 - Short Form):
Question 1: Salience assessment. Question 2: Abstinence assessment. Question 4: Relapse assessment. Question 6: Conflict assessment. Question 8: Mood modification assessment.
* Patients with craving according to the adaptation of the Gambling Follow-up Scale (GFS) described below.
An adaptation of the GFS scale, originally used to evaluate patients with Gambling Disorder, was made in order to allow the evaluation of the craving symptom in a patient with VGD. It will only be used the fourth question on this scale as follows.
"4) In the past 4 weeks, how was your desire to play?
1. I felt an irresistible urge to play.
2. I felt a strong desire to play, sometimes resistable, sometimes not.
3. I felt a strong desire to play, but resistable most of the time.
4. I felt a slight desire to play.
5. I didn't feel like playing. " It will considered that the patient has craving if he answers this question by selecting items 1, 2 or 3.
Patients must meet the following criteria before randomization:
* Have read and signed the informed consent form after the nature of the study has been fully explained and before carrying out any procedures related to the study;
* Age between 18 and 60 years old, inclusive;
* Female patients must be:
1. In post-menopause for at least one year, or;
2. Being surgically incapable of becoming pregnant (undergoing bilateral hysterectomy or oophorectomy or tubal ligation or otherwise being unable to become pregnant), or;
3. Be practicing an acceptable method of birth control (defined as: hormonal contraceptives, spermicide plus barrier, a single vasectomized partner and / or intrauterine device).
4. If a patient with the potential to become pregnant is practicing an acceptable method of birth control (as mentioned above), she must have a negative urine pregnancy test at the enrollment stage, as well as, at baseline, before receiving the study drug.
Exclusion Criteria
* Exposure to any other drug or experimental device in the 30 days prior to inclusion, except for occasional use of benzodiazepines;
* Pregnancy, breastfeeding or patients who intend to become pregnant during the study;
* Evidence of renal failure, defined as serum creatinine levels\> 133 mmol / L in men and\> 124 mmol / L in women, which correspond to\> 1.51 mg / dl and\> 1.41 mg / dl, respectively on Week 1 of inclusion;
* Evidence of clinically significant liver failure (defined as AST or ALT\> 2 times the upper limit of normal) in Week 1 of inclusion;
* Significant cardiovascular disease, including a history of myocardial infarction in the last 5 years, stroke, clinically significant heart valve disease, unstable angina, clinically abnormal ECG, arrhythmia or congestive heart failure, determining functional class III or IV (NYHA, 1964);
* Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as a diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm / Hg and / or a systolic blood pressure of 180 mm / Hg with or without medication). Hypertensive patients receiving medication should be receiving the same dose of the same antihypertensive medication for at least two months;
* Evidence of uncontrolled thyroid disorders, including hyper or hypothyroidism or abnormal TSH level. Patients who are known to have thyroid hormone replacement need to have had a stable dose for at least three months prior to inclusion and a normal TSH level upon inclusion
* History or current comorbidity with bipolar affective disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia or severe depression, additionally verified through the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PQH-9\> 19), current suicide risk, or any other neuropsychiatric condition in severe cognitive impairment;
* Current or previous history (in the previous two years) of abuse / dependence on alcohol or other psychoactive substance (except nicotine);
* If at any moment the clinician responsible for the patient identifies suicidal ideation with risk of self-harm, or death;
* Clinically significant hematological or immunological disorder;
* Patients currently receiving psychotropic medications, except for the episodic use of benzodiazepines;
* Illiteracy, or any other condition that prevents the reading and understanding of the research instruments;
* Do not have a telephone line available for remote monitoring;
* Living alone, or not being able to present a family member capable of providing collateral information on gaming behavior;
* To be followed up in another therapeutic program.
The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) will be used to verify the psychiatric exclusion diagnoses. This is a structured diagnostic interview, with quick application - approximately 45 minutes - compatible with the DSM-IV criteria. Its objective is the verification and standardization of the main Psychiatric Disorders of Axis 1 of DSM IV. It is performed by clinicians after rapid training (1 to 3 hours). The translated and adapted Brazilian version showed globally satisfactory reliability.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hermano Tavares
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hermano Tavares
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associate
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital das Clínicas da faculdade de medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Rafael Richard Clorado de Sa, Psychiatrist
Role: CONTACT
Phone: +55-11-964163663
Email: [email protected]
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Dela Coleta MF. Escala multidimensional de locus de controle de Levenson. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia; 39, 79-97. 1987
Demetrovics, Z., Urbán, R., Nagygyörgy, K., Farkas, J., Zilahy, D., Mervó, B., ... \& Harmath, E. (2011). Why do you play? The development of the motives for online gaming questionnaire (MOGQ). Behavior research methods, 43(3), 814-825.
Andrade, A. G. D., Bernik, M. A., Brunfentrinker, P., \& Negro Júnior, P. J. (1988). Dados de confiabilidade sobre uma entrevista semi-estruturada para avaliaçäo de tratamentos de alcoolistas: escala de severidade de alcoolismo (ESA). Rev. ABP-APAL, 1-4.
Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl); 176: 88-93. 2004.
Galetti AM, Tavares H. Development and validation of the Gambling Follow-up Scale, Self-Report version: an outcome measure in the treatment of pathological gambling.Braz J Psychiatry. 39(1):36-44. 2017
Garcia, M. S. (2018). Adaptação da escala UPPS-P e sua aplicabilidade na população brasileira.
Grant LD, Bowling AC. Gambling attitudes and beliefs predict attentional bias in non-problem gamblers. Journal of gambling studies; 31(4): 1487-1503. 2015.
Griffiths, Mark. Technological addictions. In: Clinical psychology forum. Division of Clinical Psychology of the British Psychol Soc, 1995. p. 14-14.
Hodgins DC. Implications of a brief intervention trial for problem gambling for future outcome research. J Gambl Stud 21:9-13. 2005.
Kim SW, Grant JE. An open naltrexone treatment study in pathological gambling disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 16(5): 285-9. 2001.
Lahti T, Halme JT, Pankakoski M, et al. Treatment of pathological gambling with naltrexone pharmacotherapy and brief intervention: a pilot study. Psychopharmacol Bull; 43(3): 35-44. 2010.
Lole L, Li E, Russell AM et al.. Are sports bettors looking at responsible gambling messages? An eye-tracking study on wagering advertisements. Behav Addict; 1;8(3):499-507. 2019.
McGrath DS, Meitner A, Sears CR. The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study. PLoS One.;13(1):e0190614. 2018
Mitchell, J., Tavares, V., Fields, H. et al.. Endogenous Opioid Blockade and Impulsive Responding in Alcoholics and Healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacol 32, 439-449; 2007.
Nestler EJ. From neurobiology to treatment: progress against addiction. Nature Neuroscience; 5: 1076-1079. 2002.
Nicoli de Mattos, C., \& Tavares, H. (2019). Development and validation of the compulsive-buying follow-up scale: A measure to assess treatment improvements in compulsive buying disorder. Psychiatry Research, 282, 112009-112009.
Şalvarli, Şerife İnci; Griffiths, Mark D. The Association Between Internet Gaming Disorder and Impulsivity: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, p. 1-27, 2019.
Santos, Veruska Andrea et al. Treatment of Internet addiction with anxiety disorders: Treatment protocol and preliminary before-after results involving pharmacotherapy and modified cognitive behavioral therapy.
Sediyama Nogueira, C. Y., Massote Carvalho, A., Gauer, G., Tavares, N., de Miranda Monteiro Santos, R., Ginani, G., ... \& Fernandes Malloy-Diniz, L. (2013). Translation and adaptation of impulsive behavior scale (UPPS) to the Brazilian population.
Shao, Rong; WANG, Yunqiang. Effect of Violent Video Games on Adolescent Aggression: Moderated Mediation Effect of Family Environment and Normative Beliefs. Frontiers in psychology, v. 10, p. 384, 2019.
Sugaya, Nagisa et al. Bio-psychosocial factors of children and adolescents with internet gaming disorder: a systematic review. BioPsychoSocial medicine, v. 13, n. 1, p. 3, 2019.
Tavares H, de Brito AM et al..Topiramate Combined with Cognitive Restructuring for theTreatmentof Gambling Disorder: A Two-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Gambl Stud.;33(1):249-263. 2017.
Van denBrink W. Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of substance use disordersand pathological gambling. Curr. Drug Abuse Rev.; 5(1), 3-31. 2012
Vitaro F, Hartl AC, et al..Genetica nd environmental influences on gambling and substance use in early adolescence. Behav Genet; 44(4):347-55. 2014.
Yvonne, H., Yau, M., \&Potenza, MD, N. Gambling Disorder and Other Behavioral Addictions: Recognition and Treatment. Harvard Review of Psychiatry; 23, 134-146. 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Gaming Naltrexone Eye Tracking
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id