Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility of Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation to Reduce Beta-amyloid Load and Improve Memory (NCT NCT04646499)
NCT ID: NCT04646499
Last Updated: 2023-07-27
Results Overview
Side effects were measured on a scale from 0 (not noticable) to 10 (not tolerable): headache, neck pain, scalp pain, tingling, itching, burning sensation, increased sleepiness, trouble concentrating, acute mood change, and phosphenes. Average rating across all measures reported as indicator of side effects.
COMPLETED
NA
14 participants
Average of all post-tACS sessions, up to 1 month
2023-07-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
74 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 • n=5 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants • Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection.
|
|
Beta Amyloid
|
0.06 unitless ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.02 • n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection. Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed. Higher values indicate worse outcomes.
|
|
Tau
|
3.38 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97 • n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection. Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed. Higher values indicate worse outcomes.
|
|
Memory: Recall
|
6.54 number of items correctly remembered
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.29 • n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection. Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
|
|
Memory: Paired Associates
|
60 percentage of items correctly remembered
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20 • n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection. Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
|
|
Memory: Fluency
|
14.67 number of items named
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78 • n=5 Participants • One participant was enrolled, but dropped out prior to data collection. Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed. Higher is better. Unit is number of items named that start with the letter f, a, or s.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Average of all post-tACS sessions, up to 1 monthPopulation: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Side effects were measured on a scale from 0 (not noticable) to 10 (not tolerable): headache, neck pain, scalp pain, tingling, itching, burning sensation, increased sleepiness, trouble concentrating, acute mood change, and phosphenes. Average rating across all measures reported as indicator of side effects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Side Effects
|
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: post-tACS, up to 1 monthDrop out rate will be assessed as the number of participants who withdraw or are withdrawn from the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=14 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Drop Out
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-tACS (baseline) and post-tACS (1 month)Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Change in plasma-based beta amyloid (AB) load was assessed as the AB42/40 ratio, calculated as post minus pre AB42/40 ratio. Greater increase is better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Beta Amyloid Load Change
|
0.0008 unitless ratio
Standard Deviation 0.006
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention as the number of words correct during the short delay free recall portion of the California Verbal Learning Test. Change was assessed as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Memory: Recall Change
|
1.5 words correct
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Episodic memory was assessed pre and post intervention from memory accuracy for a paired associates task for visual objects. Change was assessed post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Memory: Paired Associates Change
|
11.5 percent correct
Standard Deviation 21.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Episodic memory fluency was assessed pre and post intervention from performance on the FAS task. Unit of measurement is the number of words names starting with the letter f, a, or s. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater increase is better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Memory: Fluency Change
|
1.5 number of items named
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-tACS (baseline), post-tACS (after one month of treatment)Population: Only data from participants who completed the full protocol were analyzed.
Plasma tau levels was assessed pre and post intervention. Change was calculated as post minus pre. Greater decrease is better.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Gamma Stimulation Group
n=13 Participants
This group received gamma stimulation
Transcranial alternating current stimulation: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) was applied at 40 Hz (gamma band) during eight sessions over the course of a month.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Tau
|
0.27 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
Adverse Events
Gamma Stimulation Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Theodore Zanto
University of California San Francisco
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place