Geriatric Oncology Screening of Older Patients With Solid Cancers

NCT ID: NCT04644874

Last Updated: 2023-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1401 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-03

Study Completion Date

2022-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Older patients with cancer constitute a heterogeneous group with varying comorbidity; therefore, geriatric assessment with initial screening is recommended. The Geriatric 8 (G8) has been established as a promising screening tool. Currently, there are no guidelines for oncogeriatric screening in older cancer patients in Denmark. We hypothesize that by screening persons age 70 years or more with newly diagnosed cancer, with the G8, we can assess the prognostic value and identify a subgroup of patients who will benefit from a CGA.

Aims:

* Determine whether Danish cancer patients, with a G8 score of ≤14, experience poorer quality of life (QoL), receive less recommended standard cancer treatment, experience more treatment-related toxicity, stop treatment earlier, and experience shorter survival than patients with a G8 score \>14.
* Ascertain whether the standard G8 cut-off score of ≤14 is the most relevant cut-off score, with respect to treatment adherence, treatment-related toxicity, QoL, and survival, when focusing on the older Danish cancer patient population.
* Establish whether the performance and prognostic value of the G8 can be strengthened through the addition of a functional measure, the 30-second chair stand test (30-CST), and/ or the handgrip strength test (HGST).
* Evaluate the prognostic value of the modified Geriatric 8 (mG8)

Methods:

A prospective, descriptive study of all outpatients with newly diagnosed solid tumors at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, age 70 years or more. Patients will be screened with the G8, mG8, 30-CST, HGST, and QoL questionnaires at baseline with subsequent one-year follow-up, to determine the prognostic value of the G8 and the mG8. An initial two-month pilot study will help determine inclusion rates and highlight necessary practical adjustments to ensure optimal study participation. Baseline characteristics will be compared with descriptive statistics. Our primary endpoint; Global Health status/ QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 \& QLQ-ELD14), and secondary endpoints; treatment adherence, and treatment-related toxicity, will be assessed using logistical regression; while secondary endpoints; overall survival, cancer-specific survival, will be assessed using the Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Post hoc diagnostic performance analysis will be conducted to determine the optimal G8 cut-off and whether functional measures (30-CST and HGST) can enhance screening accuracy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Solid Carcinoma Frailty Age Geriatrics Screening Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Older cancer patients

All outpatients, age 70 years or more, with solid malignancies, referred to the Department of Oncology at Odense University Hospital for 1st line antineoplastic treatment or information,

Geriatric 8

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The G8 is an eight-item screening tool, developed for older cancer patients. The G8 score ranges from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired), with a cut-off for potential frailty of ≤14.

modified Geriatric 8

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The mG8 is a modified version of the Geriatric 8 screening tool, consisting of 6-items. The mG8 score ranges from 0 (not at all impaired) to 35 (heavily impaired), with a cut-off for potential frailty at ≥6.

30 second chair stand test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Repetitions within 30 seconds

Handgrip Strength Test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Measured in kilograms

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Geriatric 8

The G8 is an eight-item screening tool, developed for older cancer patients. The G8 score ranges from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired), with a cut-off for potential frailty of ≤14.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

modified Geriatric 8

The mG8 is a modified version of the Geriatric 8 screening tool, consisting of 6-items. The mG8 score ranges from 0 (not at all impaired) to 35 (heavily impaired), with a cut-off for potential frailty at ≥6.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

30 second chair stand test

Repetitions within 30 seconds

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Handgrip Strength Test

Measured in kilograms

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

G8 mG8 30s-CST chair stand test 30 CST CST sit-to-stand test 30 s chair stand test HGST HST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients age ≥70 with solid tumors (not hematological malignancies nor non-melanoma skin cancer) referred to the outpatient clinic at Odense University Hospital for information and/or antineoplastic treatment
* Patients must be able to give informed consent
* Patients must be able to speak English or Danish

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have received antineoplastic treatment for another cancer diagnosis within the past year
* Patients who have begun chemotherapy or immunotherapy for the referred cancer diagnosis, more than 48 hours prior to the time of consent
* Patients who have begun other antineoplastic treatment (not endocrine) for the referred cancer diagnosis, more than 7 days prior to the time of consent
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Danish Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Odense University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Helena Ditzel

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marianne Ewertz, MD, DMSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Southern Denmark

Jesper Ryg, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Geriatric Medicin, Odense University Hospital

Cecilia M Lund, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Clinical Medicin, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Trine L Jørgensen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital

Per Pfieffer, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital

Henrik J Ditzel, MD, DMSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Odense University Hospital

Odense, Fyn, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ditzel HM, Giger AW, Lund CM, Ditzel HJ, Mohammadnejad A, Pfeiffer P, Ryg J, Jorgensen TL, Ewertz M. Predictive Value of Geriatric Oncology Screening and Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Solid Cancers: Protocol for a Danish prospective cohort study (PROGNOSIS-G8). J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Nov;12(8):1270-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34176752 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R247-A14382

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20/ 17768

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PROGNOSIS-G8

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Project Lung Cancer Screening in Southern Denmark
NCT06537804 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA