Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
102 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-07
2019-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Predictive Biomarkers and Novel Approached to Therapy in Breast Cancer
NCT01051492
Using National University Cancer Institute of Singapore (NCIS) Registry to Measure Time Trends in Quality of Care for Breast Cancer Patients in a National Cancer Centre
NCT01866631
Analysis of Prognostic and Predictive Genomic Signatures Using Archival Paraffin-embedded Tumor Specimens in Breast Cancer
NCT01247480
Knowledge and Attitudes of Patients and Healthcare Professionals on a Spectrum of Genetic Tests Relevant to Breast Cancer Patients
NCT01619306
Comparative Genomic and Genetic Analysis of Paired Primary Breast - Metastatic Tumor Specimens Using High-throughput Platforms
NCT01227733
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In an effort to address these inconsistencies in care, the study team proposes to further develop and evaluate the implementation of a Duke-developed precision medicine software program, MeTree, within NCCS breast cancer clinics. MeTree is a patient-facing family history based risk assessment tool and clinical decision aid that was developed by researchers within Duke's Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine (CAGPM). The initial intent of MeTree was to assist clinicians in identifying patients at greater than population risk based on a number of clinical and family health history (FHH) factors for a range of common conditions (including cancer) and provide clinical decision support (CDS) with specific recommendations based on common U.S. guidelines for prevention and screening.MeTree has been thoroughly tested and validated and is currently being implemented across five U.S. healthcare systems by way of a large cooperative grant through NHGRI's IGNITE network.2-7 Dr. Orlando is co-PI of this study and Dr. Wu served as a site PI.
Through the efforts of Drs. Wu and Orlando, among others, a research agreement was recently signed between Duke University and the National Heart Center Singapore (NHCS) to allow testing of MeTree within a cardiovascular epidemiologic study, the Biobank study (MeTree-Biobank pilot). The Biobank study is providing data to the SPECTRA healthy population database developed by the SingHealth/Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine (PRISM). SPECTRA aims to collect detailed phenotypic and genomic information on 5,000 healthy Singaporeans. MeTree will be used to collect detailed FHH on Biobank participants. This collaboration is part of a larger partnership between CAGPM and PRISM to further develop cross-institution collaborations. Enrollment in the Biobank study is currently underway and incorporation of MeTree into the data capture flow started June 2017.
This proposal leverages the larger collaborative work already started to explore clinically meaningful applications of MeTree within SingHealth. While MeTree has been shown to be clinically effective within primary care clinics in the U.S., SingHealth's oncologists are interested in leveraging MeTree's risk assessment features both to establish a more organized, standardized, and systematic process for collecting information to enhance cancer management and to maximize the advances in precision medicine for the benefit of cancer patients. Therefore, in collaboration with SingHealth oncologist Dr. Ngeow, the principal investigators propose to explore, develop, and pilot a prototype MeTree cancer module through the following two aims:
Specific Aim 1: Create a Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in MeTree Specific Aim 2: Validate and Pilot the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in a clinical setting within SingHealth.
APPROACH Specific Aim 1: Create a Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in MeTree. The prototype will focus on breast cancer, as a demonstration case, since the prevalence is high, the value of risk assessment is established, and MeTree already assesses risk for both familial and hereditary forms. To achieve this aim the investigators will work with Dr. Joanne Ngeow, head of the Cancer Genetics Service at NCCS, to understand current risk assessment practices in the oncology clinics, identify gaps and inefficiencies in meeting Singapore's risk assessment guidelines, and adapt MeTree to facilitate uptake of guideline-based care. All aspects of risk assessment will be evaluated, from gathering the right type of data to understanding the appropriate clinical actions that follow from each risk assessment result. The goals will be to: 1) create a MeTree integration plan for both patients and providers that will optimize its value, 2) incorporate additional data elements and risk algorithms into MeTree as appropriate, 3) generate tailored clinical decision support for the patient and their oncologist to facilitate appropriate ordering and interpretation of genetic tests. Drs. Wu, Orlando, and Ngeow will work together on all three steps, with Dr. Ngeow's expertise in genetics and oncology at SingHealth being critical for ensuring the team develops a useful and facile tool that meets the needs of SingHealth oncologists.
Deliverables These efforts will provide a breast cancer clinical decision support module that is ready for implementation testing in a breast cancer clinical environment. It will be a model upon which additional cancer CDS modules could be built, tested, and implemented.
Specific Aim 2: Validate and Pilot the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module in a clinical setting within SingHealth. To assess the feasibility and potential clinical utility of the Breast Cancer Clinical Decision Support Module, the investigators will perform a mixed-methods hybrid type II implementation-effectiveness pilot in the NCCS cancer genetics clinic and one additional surgical breast cancer clinic. The results of this 12-week pilot will inform both its potential impact on clinical care and how further to optimize it for broader clinical integration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Breast cancer patients
Breast cancer patients being seen at SingHealth
MeTree
Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MeTree
Software program collecting family health history and generating clinical decision support for risk-based preventive care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Employees in the above intervention clinics and the ongoing MeTree-Biobank pilot who are 1) staff assisting patients using MeTree, or 2) providers reviewing MeTree risk reports with patients, will be invited to participate in one to one interviews. We plan to recruit at least 10 employees for interviews.
* Healthy volunteers from the MeTree-Biobank pilot who have completed MeTree and agreed to re-contact for future studies, will be invited to participate in one to one interviews on the same topics as the patients in #1. We will recruit 20 Biobank participants for interviews.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lori A Orlando, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
NCCS Cancer Genetics Clinic
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fung SM, Wu RR, Myers RA, Goh J, Ginsburg GS, Matchar D, Orlando LA, Ngeow J. Clinical implementation of an oncology-specific family health history risk assessment tool. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Mar 20;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00177-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00087654
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.