Perceptions, Experiences, and Activity in CancEr Survivors During COVID-19

NCT ID: NCT04637295

Last Updated: 2023-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-27

Study Completion Date

2021-06-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To examine perceptions and determinants of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic among cancer survivors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This purpose of this study is to examine perceptions and determinants of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in cancer survivors. To test our aim, we will recruit up to 1000 adults diagnosed with cancer within the last five years and ask them to complete an online questionnaire battery assessing their self-reported physical activity habits, psychosocial outcomes (e.g., depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, social support), and perceptions of physical activity engagement during the pandemic. A subsample of participants (n=50) will also be invited to participate in an interview to gain further insights into cancer survivors' physical activity experiences during COVID-19. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to analyze the quantitative survey data, and thematic analysis will be used to analyze the qualitative interview data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neoplasms Malignant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult with a history of cancer (except non-invasive skin cancer)
* Diagnosed at age 19 or older
* Diagnosed within 5 years of study enrollment
* Access to a computer, tablet, or smartphone with the Internet
* English reading

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to read in English
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Diane K Ehlers, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4053261 (View on PubMed)

Resnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale. Nurs Res. 2000 May-Jun;49(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10882320 (View on PubMed)

Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2748771 (View on PubMed)

Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Hoch CC, Yeager AL, Kupfer DJ. Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Sleep. 1991 Aug;14(4):331-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1947597 (View on PubMed)

Basen-Engquist K, Bodurka-Bevers D, Fitzgerald MA, Webster K, Cella D, Hu S, Gershenson DM. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-ovarian. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1809-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1809.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11251013 (View on PubMed)

Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9095563 (View on PubMed)

Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 1;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12914662 (View on PubMed)

Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.3.472.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7431205 (View on PubMed)

Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8576833 (View on PubMed)

Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M. & Trzesniewski, K. H. Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 151-161 (2001).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wagner, L. I., Sweet, J., Butt, Z., Lai, J. & Cella, D. Measuring patient self-report cognitive function: Development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument. J. Support. Oncol. 7, W32-W39 (2009).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Resnick B, Orwig D, Magaziner J, Wynne C. The effect of social support on exercise behavior in older adults. Clin Nurs Res. 2002 Feb;11(1):52-70. doi: 10.1177/105477380201100105.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11845515 (View on PubMed)

Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess. 1991 Aug;57(1):149-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1920028 (View on PubMed)

Nielsen MG, Ornbol E, Vestergaard M, Bech P, Larsen FB, Lasgaard M, Christensen KS. The construct validity of the Perceived Stress Scale. J Psychosom Res. 2016 May;84:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27095155 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0768-20-EX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.