Return to Learn Implementation Bundle for Schools (RISE) After Youth Concussion

NCT ID: NCT04635475

Last Updated: 2024-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-30

Study Completion Date

2022-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, as our overarching conceptual framework, this translational 2 ½ year pragmatic RCT uses a clustered, stepped wedge design to test the effectiveness of a school-based (unit of analysis) implementation strategy (project intervention) called RISE (Return to Learn Implementation bundle for schools) on evidence-based practice (RTL protocol implementation; main outcome) and student outcomes (i.e., days to RTL start after diagnosis) after youth concussion. The central hypothesis is that schools in the intervention condition receiving the RISE implementation bundle (toolkit plus school support) will have more complete and sustainable RTL protocols, and better student outcomes compared to schools in control condition who receive only written RTL protocol information. As rural and low SES schools are particularly likely to struggle to implement RTL protocols,19,25 we specifically examine RISE implementation and barriers to implementation related to school demographic characteristics related to health equity. The school characteristics we examine are rurality, primary language, racial and ethnic mix, and free/reduced-cost lunch.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As you are aware, COVID caused us to consider how to complete this project and answer the scientific questions posed in the Specific Aims. The investigators considered shifting the RTL project to a later time and switching with another project but this would not have worked for the other project.

To solve this challenge of impact of school changes, the investigators convened with the project advisory board for consultation, consulted the research core at HIPRC and contacted the participants who were to have been participants in the randomized controlled trial. 19 of the 24 schools responded. From this work, the investigators agreed that since the school context has changed to either home online or hybrid mode, that students with concussion who are the recipients of the intervention should not be deprived of an intervention that is potentially beneficial.

The investigators have therefore made the following adaptations that retained the specific aims and central hypothesis that school context capacity can be strengthened to provide tailored student-centered RTL care and improve outcomes for students with a concussion.

To this end, the investigators are considering "school" wherever students are receiving an education. The investigators will recruit subjects who are currently largely coordinating education due to COVID, work with their schools, and recruit nationally. These adaptations will require a sample size of a total of 150 high school students with recent concussion (75 intervention \[Group A: RISE bundle + CDC information\], 75 controls \[Group B: CDC information only\]) who will be recruited using social media and other platforms.

There are some advantages to this design: 1) The investigator's intervention materials will now be able to be translated to Spanish due to adaptations, 2) This project will reach more particpants in rural and from disadvantaged backgrounds, 3) Communications between particpants and schools will be enhanced.

Given return to school, we have reverted to the stepped wedge study design in WA state.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Concussion, Mild

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Testing RISE bundle to improve RTL care after concussion
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Consented parents of a concussed high school student who will receive CDC Head's UP Concussion Guidelines during a five week program. 75 Participants.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention Group

Consented parents of a concussed high school student who will receive the CDC Head's Up Concussion Guidelines and intervention RTL Student Protocol during a five week program. 75 Participants.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RISE Bundle

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Toolkit to build capacity where students receive education and provide symptom based and tailored accommodations after concussion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RISE Bundle

Toolkit to build capacity where students receive education and provide symptom based and tailored accommodations after concussion

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High School Student between the age of 14-19, who attends in person, online, or a hybrid academic platform, and the concussion did not include an acute care hospital course greater than 48 hours.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Monica Vavilala

Professor, School of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monica S Vavilala, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Washington

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HIPRC

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R49CE003087-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

STUDY00008181

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id