Does the Mode of Anesthesia Affect the Feto-maternal Outcome in Category-1 Caesarean Section

NCT ID: NCT04634981

Last Updated: 2021-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-12

Study Completion Date

2021-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become the standard technique in elective cesarean section (CS) as it results in less maternal and neonatal morbidity than general anesthesia (GA) (Grade-A recommendation, NICE). For women requiring emergency CS, rapid sequence general anesthesia (RSGA) is commonly used because this technique is faster to perform than SA. Though several randomized trials have compared the maternal and fetal outcome between these two anesthetic techniques, the studies with respect to category 1 CS (emergent conditions that hold immediate threat to life of the woman or fetus) are limited.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Full term pregnant females will be included in this study. They will be allocated into two groups:

(Group G): will receive rapid sequence general anesthesia, and (Group S): will receive spinal anesthesia. After preoperative assessment and investigations by the attending anesthesiologist, the decision of the anesthetic approach will be decided by the attending anesthesiologist according to indications for CS.

Before induction of anesthesia intravenous (IV) ranitidine 50 mg will be administered after establishing an IV access. On the operating table, vital signs will be monitored for all parturients throughout the surgery according to the standard departmental protocol.

fetal well being will be assessed after delivery by using 1 minute and 5 min APGAR score and umbilical cord PH . in addition to maternal vital signs intra-operative then follow up any complications that may occur to the mother post-operative.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia; Adverse Effect Newborn Morbidity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group general anesthesia (G)

patients will positioned with pelvic wedge on operating table and preoxygenated. Then rapid sequence induction with precalculated doses of propofol (2 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) will followed by endotracheal intubation. After delivery of the baby, fentanyl will be administered. Later, anesthesia will be maintained with isoflurane (1%).

anesthesia of emergency cesarean section

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

compare General versus spinal anesthesia

Group Spinal anesthesia (S)

all parturients will co-loaded with 500 ml of colloid solution. In the left lateral position, the patients' back will be cleaned with povidone iodine. In the meantime, the spinal anesthetic drug and local anesthetic drug will be prepared. After wiping povidone iodine with alcohol, a rapid single shot of 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine will be administered intrathecally using 22 G spinal needle. Oxygen will be administered using simple face mask till the delivery of the baby.

anesthesia of emergency cesarean section

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

compare General versus spinal anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

anesthesia of emergency cesarean section

compare General versus spinal anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) \< III
* Age 18-40 year
* Gestational age\>37 weeks
* Emergency cesarean delivery
* Singleton pregnancy

Exclusion Criteria

* Twin pregnancy
* Disagreement of the patient
* Neurological impairment
* Congenital fetal abnormality
* body mass index \> 40 kg/m2; and
* Sensitivity to any of the drugs used during the emergency CS.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Benha University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Samar Rafik Mohamed Amin

lecturer of anesthesia and surgical ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samar Rafik Mohamed Amin

Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC-FOMBU 000048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.